Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: appropriation act 2008 Court: central administrative tribunal cat madras Page 13 of about 135 results (0.064 seconds)

B. Sathia Vs. the Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare S ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... a rejoinder has been filed by the applicant stating that a person who possesses the requisite qualification for being appointed to a particular post and then he is appointed with the approval and consultation of the appropriate authority and continues in the post for a fairly long period, then such appointment cannot be held to be stop-gap or fortuitous or purely ad hoc. ..... sathia, the applicant herein is working as auxillary nurse midwife has filed oa under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 seeking a direction to the first respondent to regularize her services in the said post from the date of her initial appointment with effect from 27.3.2007 and to fix the time scale of pay. 2. .....

V. Mathanan Vs. Union of India Rep. by the Chairman, Railway Board, Mi ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... filed by the respondents it is stated that as the issue regarding the community certificate of the applicant has not yet been settled and the st certificate produced by him has not been cleared to be bona fide by the appropriate authority of government of tamil nadu, it has been decided to provisionally pay the settlement dues of the applicant and as per the decision taken, the settlement benefits of pf, cgegis and leave encashment were paid to him and ..... in the said circumstances, we direct the respondents to settle all the benefits arising out of his retirement on superannuation and pass appropriate orders to that effect within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. ..... status of his community certificate was also referred to district level vigilance committee for verification of genuineness of the said certificate and subsequently the case of the applicant was referred to state level scrutiny who is the appropriate authority to decide the genuineness of st community certificate. ..... satapathy, administrative member seeking a direction to the second respondent to pay the superannuation pension and dcrg and other retirement benefits, the applicant has filed this application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985. 2. .....

N. Subramaniam Vs. the Secretary, Railway Rates

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... though the applicant has right to urge some kind of mala fides on the part of the member-incharge of the chairman, there is no material to come to that conclusion and it appears that the member incharge chairman had acted very well within limits and also taking into consideration the entire history of the applicant's service career and also the administrative exigencies. ..... it is made clear that the competent authority had always the right to reopen the matter and to consider the said selection of the applicant whether it is right or wrong or legal or illegal, correct or incorrect and take appropriate decision in the matter. ..... this application is filed under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, praying to quash to impugned order at annexure no.a-9 i.e. ..... he appears to have acted bona fide but there are no mala fides.14. .....

A. Thirumalai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... law rule obliterates a statute completely as if it had never passed and thus operates retrospectively on past transactions in the absence of a saving clause or in the absence of provisions such as are contained in the interpretation act, 1889 or in the general clauses act, 1897; while a provision in a statute that with effect from a particular date an existing law would be void to the extent of the repugnancy has no such retrospective operation and cannot affect pending prosecutions or actions ..... it is also stated that since he has hot worked in the appropriate post for the remaining period he is not entitled for the salary on the principle of no ..... in brief to the divergent views expressed in the first instance by the three learned judges, adverts to the fact that in air 1951 sc 318 though the constitutional validity of the bombay prohibition act (act 25 of 1949) was challenged ultimately that attack substantially failed and the act was maintained with the exception of a few provisions that were declared invalid. ..... in this view, the high court held that the proceedings initiated under the 1931 act and which were pending on the date of the commencement of the constitution were not affected, even if the 1931 act was inconsistent with the fundamental rights guaranteed under article 19(i)(a) and has become void under article ..... have followed the logical result of this rule and even convictions made under such an unconstitutional statute have been set aside by issuing appropriate writs. .....

K. Salaimuthu and Another Vs. Union of India Rep by General Manager, S ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... kamal sengupta 2008 2 scc (lands) 735 held as follows: "since the tribunal's power to review its order/decision is akin to that of the civil court, statutorily enumerated and judicially recognised limitations on the civil court's power to review its judgment/decision would also apply to the tribunal's power under section 22(3) (f) of the act. ..... a tribunal established under the act is entitled to review its order/decision only if either of the grounds enumerated in order 47 rule 1 are available. ..... 596 has held as follows: "any other attempt, except an attempt to correct an apparent error or an attempt not based on any ground set out in order 47, would amount to an abuse of the liberty given to the tribunal under the act to review its judgment." 7. ..... if an error is not self-evident and detection thereof requires long debate and process of reasoning, it cannot be treated as an error apparent on the face of the record for the purpose of order 47 rule 1 cpc and/or section 22(3)(f) of the act. .....

D.Dwarakanadha Reddy Vs. Union of India Rep by Commissioner of Customs ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... satapathy, administrative member) the applicant d.dwarakanatha reddy filed the oa under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, challenging the order dated 9.6.2011 passed by the first respondent placing him under suspension and also the extension of suspension order dated 5.9.2011. ..... prior to that he was working as appraising officer in the air cargo complex, chennai from march 2008 to june,2010. ..... therefore, the respondents have acted in a discriminatory manner placing the applicant alone under suspension c. ..... 108 of customs act. .....

Smt. Margaret, Superintendent, Regional Passport Office Vs. the Joint ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... r.satapathy, administrative member challenging the transfer order dated 29.4.2011 and also the order dated 17.10.2011 rejecting his request for retention at chennai, this application is filed under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 for quashing the said orders and consequently direct the first respondent to retain him in the chennai office. 2. ..... we also find that the representation made by the applicant against the transfer has already been considered and appropriate orders passed by the respondents. .....

J. Dinesh Vs. Union of India, Rep. by the Director (Staff) and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... it is further urged by him that vacancies existed from 2001 to 2008 and 2011 had not been taken into consideration to assess 5% vacancy for granting compassionate appointment. ..... 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985, seeking the following relief: i) to call for the records of the 1st respondent pertaining to the scheme which is made in no. .....

Lingam Ramalingam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

Reported in : (2006)(3)SLJ187CAT

..... the details, we are of the view that the concerned authorities namely, general manager, chief vigilance commission and the director, cbi are hereby directed to look into the complaint and take appropriate necessary steps expeditiously, if warranted. ..... of the applicant was disposed of by chief works manager by the impugned order dated 2.3.2005 holding that there was no provision and in the absence of any specific complaint on disciplinary authority that he is acting in a prejudicial manner and was a material witness directly concerned with the charges mentioned in the case. ..... 2002 before the tribunal and the tribunal by order dated 29.12.2004 disapproving the act of the respondent directed payment of subsistence allowance directly to the applicant. ..... these show that the third respondent is acting vindictively and entertained personal animosity against the ..... matter of fact, the impugned order itself says that the applicant had not brought any specific complaint on which he is acting in a prejudiced manner so as to nominate ad hoc disciplinary authority. ..... it cannot be disputed that if the disciplinary authority is acting in a prejudiced manner and biased against the applicant, then it will not be possible to expect a fair report and an order from the ..... as such, if the second/third respondent act as the disciplinary authority, it would prejudice ihe rights of ilic applicant at the ..... , the second/third respondent suffers from prejudice and bias and cannot act impartially and objectively. .....

P. Ramani Vs. Union of India Rep by the General Manager, Southern Rail ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... the respondents are directed to consider the case of the applicant's son for providing him compassionate appointment in accordance with the rules and pass appropriate order within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. ..... of the request made by the applicant herein for compassionate appointment to her son by the impugned order of the third respondent dated 4.3.2011, she has come before this tribunal under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 to set aside the said order and for a direction to the respondents to provide compassionate appointment to her son. 2. ..... it is also pointed out by them that the divorce granted by the village panchayat is not valid after enactment of the hindu marriage act, 1955 and the applicant had not produced any divorce degree granted by the competent court. .....