Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: apprentices amendment act 2007 section 4 amendment of section 10 Page 1 of about 226,025 results (0.766 seconds)

M/s. Indication Instruments Limited Vs. Anita Kumari and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... amended provision in section 2-a (2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 ("the act") by approaching the labour court-iii, faridabad. anita kumari had earlier to the period in question worked intermittently with the management in 2007 and 2008 and had suffered two termination orders before she was appointed on march 02, 2009 as an apprentice ..... (learner), a post not covered under the apprentices act, 1961 ("1961 act") because it was so stated by the management itself in the appointment ..... in the factory and whether it was allowed by him. the labour court neeed not have travelled that far since the worker was not an apprentice under the apprentices act which was the admitted position but the findings do fortify the conclusion. 6. the labour court on appreciating the evidence on record has held .....

Union of India and Others Vs. All India Postal Ed Employees Union (Pun ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... note that the ceiling limit was increased from ` 2,500/- to ` 3,500/-, as per amending act no.45 of 2007. the said act also introduced the concept of bonus civil writ petition no.13491 of 2009 5 linked with production or productivity by amending act no.23 of 1976. thus, a concept of bonus based originally on profit alone was expanded by ..... where (i) where an agreement or a settlement has been entered into by the employees with their employer before the commencement of the payment of bonus (amendment) act, 1976 (23 of 1976).or (ii)where (ii)where the employees enter into any agreement or settlement with their employer after such commencement, for payment ..... a government employee. now, turning to the provisions of the payment of bonus act, 1965 (for short 'the act').an employee is defined under clause (13) of section 2, being the definition clause, as under:- (13) "employee" means any person (other than an apprentice) employed on a salary or wage not exceeding ten thousand rupees per mensem in .....

Krishna Preetha Vs. Jayan Moorkkanatt

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2010(2)KLT459

..... marriage may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnised before or after the commencement of the indian divorce (amendment) act, 2001, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of two years or more, that they have not been able to live together and they have ..... divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnised before or after the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976 (68 of 1976), on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live ..... . smt. jeejabai 1986 klj 833 (d.b.)2. k.k. anirudhan v. t. prasanna kumari 1989 (1) klt 42 : 1989 (1) hlr ker. 682 (single bench)3. rekharani v. prabhu 2007 (3) klt 917 (d.b.)18. this view that the period of waiting cannot be waived, we find, has been taken by other high courts also. we refer to three .....

Nisha Chandrashekhar Khobragade Vs. Chandrashekhar Gopichand Khobragad ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR742; 1987MhLJ63

..... may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and ..... learned judge observed that there did not appear to be any collusion between the parties and the policy of the law having undergone a change after the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976, it is possible now to dissolve a marriage by agreement between the parties although none of the grounds, on which a marriage may be dissolved by a ..... compromise application for grant of decree for divorce by mutual consent, they must be deemed to have asked for an amendment of the application and when the court acted upon it, it must be deemed to have allowed the amendment. the second objection before the high court was about not making the motion as required by section 13-b and .....

California Div. of Labor Standards Enforcement Vs. Dillingham Constr., ...

Court : US Supreme Court

..... presents the question whether the pre-emption provision of the employee retirement income security act of 1974 (erisa), 88 stat. 829, as amended, 29 u. s. c. 1001 et seq., supersedes california's prevailing wage law to the extent that the law prohibits payment of an apprentice wage to an apprentice trained in an unapproved program. we conclude that california's law does not ..... "relate to" employee benefit plans, and thus is not pre-empted. i a since 1931, the davis-bacon act, 46 stat. 1494, as amended, 40 u. s. c. 276a to 276a-5, has required that .....

Prabhari Adhikari Nagar Palika and anr. Vs. Ramesh Chandra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1991(62)FLR265]; (1992)ILLJ639All; (1991)1UPLBEC203

..... officer or by reason of the powers vested in him, functions mainly of a managerial nature.' section 2(s), central act (subsequent to amendment by central act no. 46 of 1982):'workman' means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any manual, un-skilled, skilled, technical, operational, supervisory work for hire or ..... amplitude.(i) the word 'workman' as defined under the two enactments reads as under: -section 2(s), central act (prior to amendment by central act no. 46 of 1982):'workman' means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any skilled or unskilled manual, supervisory, technical or clerical work for hire or reward ..... work is skilled or unskilled manual, but after amendment, the category of manual work is separated and now it is 'manual, unskilled, skilled' and a new category of operational work was also added.section 2(z) of u.p. act:'workman' means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any skilled .....

Vinod Kumar and anr. Vs. Ajit Singh

Court : Delhi

..... immovable property, it would come within the ambit of residuary clause (c) of article 5 of schedule 1 of ista, which is extended to union territory of delhi by delhi amendment act of 2001. the stamp duty as per residuary clause (c) of article 5 thereof is rs.50/-. the agreement to sell in question being on stamp paper of rs.10 ..... is the defendant s case that the agreement to sell was required to be stamped as per article 23a of schedule 1a of indian stamp (delhi amendment) act, 2001 and as per this provision stamp duty equivalent to 90 per cent of the duty as conveyance was payable, and further that in the absence of the same this ..... . opal metal engineering pvt. ltd. air2009delhi 1 and shri rakesh chandok vs. smt. harbans kaur (i.a. no.5540/2005 in cs(os) no.1281/2004, decided on 30.04.2007) and the decision of punjab and haryana high court in sukhwinder kaur vs. amarjit singhand others air2012p&h97 7. as is apparent from the written statement, all the pleas which .....

Dr.Sindhu K. Rajan Vs. Dr.Ajith M.

Court : Kerala

..... may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnised before or after the commencement of the marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976 (68 of 1976), on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to ..... effect from the date of the decree." op(fc) no.309/2014 5 7. sub-section (1) of section 13b of the act is applicable to marriages solemnised before or after commencement of the amendment to the act by act 68 of 1976 (w.e.f. 27.05.1976). on a careful scrutiny of sub- section (1) of section 13b of ..... v. arundhati tripathy, (2005) 7 scc353 air2005sc3297 naveen kohli v. neelu kohli, (2006) 4 scc558 air2006sc1675 sanghamitra ghosh v. kajal kumar ghosh (2007) 2 scc220 rishikesh sharma v. saroj sharma (2007) 2 scc263 samar ghosh v. jaya ghosh ((2007) 4 scc511 satish sitole v. ganga, (2008) 7 scc734 (2008) 3 scc (cri.) 225: air2008sc3093 however, these are the cases, op(fc .....

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

..... made by the labour court holding that since the contract of apprenticeship was entered in to between the parties and the incumbent was appointed as an apprentice under the apprentices act, 1961 and his contract was not sent for registration to the apprenticeship adviser that will not change the character of the incumbent. hence, the ..... is relevant to notice at this juncture that prior to amendment of the said act in the year 1973 by act no. 27 of 1973, section 4 postulated that apprenticeship training would not commence till a contract of apprenticeship was entered into by and between the apprentice and the employer and the same was registered with the apprenticeship ..... the provision of section 4 of the said act as it existed prior to 1973 assumes importance for the purpose of interpretation thereof.95. it is furthermore not in dispute that the said amendment was brought about with a view to avoid delay in commencement of training of the apprentices.. 96. mr. r. venkataramani, learned senior .....

Anil BhasIn Vs. Vijay Kumar BhasIn and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003(67)DRJ174

..... the existing list of immovable properties. ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....'3. the objection of the defendant is that the averments sought to be included by amendment, are hit by the benami transactions (prohibition) act 1988, and as such cannot be allowed. reliance is placed upon the decision of the hon'ble himachal high court in the case reported as dr. ..... a benami transaction in the name of the defendant is clearly prohibited by the benami transaction (prohibition) act, 1988 (act no. 45 of 1988). may be that it is an additional approach for getting the same relief but no amendment can be allowed having the effect of allowing an additional plea to be raised which is prohibited by ..... the benefit of the person buying or providing the consideration as was the position prior to the amendment of 1988.16. at the same time, there exists the provisions of section 4(3)(b) of the benami transactions act 1988, being in the nature of a proviso excluding from the prohibition, the right to recover .....