Skip to content


Application - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: application Court: drat madras Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 14 results (0.119 seconds)
Mar 19 2007 (TRI)

Darmesh Madhusoodan Thakkar Vs. Union Bank of India and ors.

Court: DRAT Madras

Decided on: Mar-19-2007

Reported in: IV(2007)BC39

1 this is an application to condone the delay of 1652 days in filing the appeal i have heard the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 2007 (TRI)

Corporation Bank Vs. Vittaldas Bhandarkar

Court: DRAT Madras

Decided on: May-03-2007

Reported in: IV(2007)BC52

..... directing the appellant to give interim possession of the property during the pendency of the application appeal before the drt 3 in the result the appeal is allowed to that extent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 11 2007 (TRI)

Bob Housing Finance Ltd. Vs. Saeed Ur Rahman

Court: DRAT Madras

Decided on: Apr-11-2007

Reported in: IV(2007)BC47

..... contract for sale of real property makes the purchaser owner in equity thereof has no application in india but the calcutta high court distinguished the case in their hand by pointing ..... case are similar to the calcutta case and hence the principles laid down are squarely applicable to our case 7 the learned advocate for the respondent has not placed material contrary .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 23 2007 (TRI)

Indian Bank Vs. City Hospitals and anr.

Court: DRAT Madras

Decided on: Apr-23-2007

Reported in: IV(2007)BC61

..... janaki ammal or the 2nd defendant the ratio decidendi in the said judgment is squarely applicable to the case on hand dale amp carrington invt p ltd and anr v p ..... 1 the oa filed by the appellant applicant bank before the drt ii at chennai was dismissed against defendants 4 and 5 by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 2007 (TRI)

Pradeep D. Kothari Vs. Uti Bank and ors.

Court: DRAT Madras

Decided on: Feb-28-2007

Reported in: IV(2007)BC53

..... the remedy under srfaesi act that thereafter the appellant filed srfaesi application before the drt challenging the notice dated 5 9 2005 issued ..... issuance of the notice under section 13 4 and hence the application was not filed within time and the same is liable to ..... section 13 2 for the second time and hence this present application is not maintainable and the same is liable to be dismissed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 08 2007 (TRI)

Canara Bank Vs. Mitre P. Mallar and ors.

Court: DRAT Madras

Decided on: Feb-08-2007

Reported in: IV(2007)BC32

..... the reach of the creditors including the appellant herein 3 the said application was opposed by the respondents before the drt by filing counter ..... was satisfied with the undertaking given in the counter and dismissed the application aggrieved by the same this appeal has been filed 5 on ..... papers it is made out that the appellant had filed the application on 26 5 2006 and the counter was filed on 16 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 07 2007 (TRI)

Savik Vijai Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Punjab National Bank

Court: DRAT Madras

Decided on: Feb-07-2007

Reported in: IV(2007)BC14

..... dated 7 11 2005 passed by this tribunal therefore the present review application is not sustainable 3 it could also be seen that the ..... but there is no specific provision fixing time limit for preferring review application either under the rddb amp fi act 1993 or under drat procedure ..... only 30 days from the date of the decree or order this application to review the order dated 7 11 2005 is not filed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 09 2007 (TRI)

Central Bank of India Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court: DRAT Madras

Decided on: Apr-09-2007

Reported in: IV(2007)BC49

..... only in the said circumstances the appellant has chosen to file applications to examine the appellant bank s witness 4 the learned advocate ..... to examine in chief of its own witness and therefore the applications filed by the appellant is not at all sustainable 5 ..... be granted i feel that out of anxiety the applicant appellant has filed these applications as they have repeatedly stated in the affidavit .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 2007 (TRI)

Federal Bank Ltd. Vs. Venus Knitting Industries and

Court: DRAT Madras

Decided on: Feb-15-2007

Reported in: IV(2007)BC18

..... the date of institution of suit before civil court or in original application before the drt ii interest from the date of institution of ..... of 12 p a as future interest was reasonable this has no application to our case 12 the learned advocate for the respondents has ..... to the decree holder by the arbitrators and the trial court an application under section 152 of the code of civil procedure was filed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 20 2007 (TRI)

Canara Bank Vs. T. Bhimaraj

Court: DRAT Madras

Decided on: Mar-20-2007

Reported in: IV(2007)BC42

..... the prohibitory order of attachment hence the appellant filed the application stating that the respondent has done so with an intention ..... but his compromise proposal was rejected the appellant filed an application for the arrest of the 2nd defendant having violated the ..... that only in the said circumstances the appellant filed an application to attach the money of the respondent which is available .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //