Application Programme - Judgment Search Results

Radhey Shiam Vs. R.C. Bhattiya

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1945All53

..... assistant collector however thought that there was no sufficient ground for restoration and rejected the applications there were appeals filed before the learned district judge mr plowden who called for a ..... the plaintiffs but according to some practice prevailing in the revenue courts this change of programme was notified to the bar association and the mukhtars association notice of the change of .....

Ex Parte Endo

Court: US Supreme Court

leave clearance does not authorize departure from the relocation center application for indefinite leave must also be made indefinite leave may

Kaliammai Ammal Vs. R. Shanmuga Rajeswara Sethupati Alias Naganatha Se ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1945Mad20

i hold therefore the article 181 limitation act has no application to this case then the only question is whether article

Manickam Chettiar Vs. Ramaswami Chettiar and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1945Mad70

is reinforced by calling attention to the fact that the application to the kumbakonam court is drafted as an execution petition

Korematsu Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... military zone prescribed by any military commander contrary to the restrictions applicable to any such area or zone or contrary to the ..... to note that the order by its express terms had no application to persons within the bounds of an established assembly center ..... general dewitt s report to the secretary of war concerning the programme of evacuation and relocation of japanese makes it entirely clear .....

United States Vs. Laudani

Court: US Supreme Court

to avoid what it considered to be such an extreme application of the act the court focused attention on the clause

United States Vs. Crescent Amusement Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

if it is a burden which cannot be lightened by application to the court for exercise of the power which it

icc Vs. City of Jersey City

Court: US Supreme Court

payable by a dime as reasonable and otherwise lawful for application during the war and for six months after its termination

Billings Vs. Truesdell

Court: US Supreme Court

the oath identical requirements in the predecessor articles of war applicable to enlistees were construed as inapplicable to draftees under the

Bowles Vs. Willingham

Court: US Supreme Court

fixing of rates which are just and reasonable in their application to particular persons or companies federal power commission v hope