Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: apartment ownership act 1972 section 21 insurance Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 9,280 results (0.173 seconds)

Feb 19 1981 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. (Formerly Known as Calcutta Insurance, Mad ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1983]54CompCas608(Mad)

..... the claim petitions, who came on record as the legal representative of the first respondent, contended that she sold the said car to niranjan roy for a valuable consideration on august 14, 1972, that she had informed about the transfer of ownership of the car to the insurance company on the same day, that the person who drove the vehicle at the time of the accident was not her employee and that, therefore, she is not vicariously ..... on the question the court took the view that as there was no statutory provision either under the motor vehicles act or under the insurance act, about the transferee's right under the motor insurance policy, the contract of insurance being a contract of personal indemnity, cannot be assigned when it is transferred, though there can be a novation of the contract by which the original assured is released and a new assured is accepted. ..... apart from the fact that the said section relates to the cancellation or suspension of the policy, and not to a case of automatic lapse of the policy on the transfer of the vehicle, having regard to the short interval between the date of the transfer and the date of the accident, there is no transfer possibility of the insurer intimating about the factum of lapse of the policy on the transfer to the registering authority. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 1821 (FN)

Merchants' Loan and Trust Co. Vs. Smietanka

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , submitted with it, and in other cases since argued that the word "income," as used in the sixteenth amendment and in the income tax act we are considering, does not include the gain from capital realized by a single isolated sale of property, but that only the profits realized from sales by one engaged in buying and selling as a business -- a ..... 509, 553, declared unconstitutional on an unrelated ground; that it was not recognized in determining income under the excise tax act of 1909, as the cases cited supra show; that it is not to be found, in terms, in any of the income tax provisions of the internal revenue acts of 1913, 1916, 1917, or 1919; that the definition of the word "income" as used in the sixteenth amendment, which has been developed by this court, does not recognize ..... realized from the sale of stock by two investors, as distinguished from dealers, and from a single transaction, as distinguished from a course of business, the value of the stock on the effective date of the tax act was deducted, and the resulting gain was treated by this court as "income" by which the tax was measured. ..... 519 case at bar if the word "income" has the same meaning in the income tax act of 1913 that it had in the corporation excise tax act of 1909, and that it has the same scope of meaning was in effect decided in southern ..... dealings in property, whether real or personal, growing out of the ownership or use of or interest in real or personal property . . ..... section 2(a) of the act of september 8, .....

Tag this Judgment!

1835

United States Vs. the Brig Burdett

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the, agent acting within his authority, is substituted for the principal in every respect, and his statements, which form apart of the res gestae, may be ..... after a full and mature examination of all the facts in this case, whilst we admit the acts of the claimant are not clear of suspicion, we are forced to the conclusion that the evidence does not authorize a forfeiture of ..... witness has had correspondence with carrera respecting the vessel, and has insured her by orders from carrera on account of steever. ..... a subject of the king of spain, and resident abroad, which ownership was known to the persons owning or pretending to own the whole or a part of the brig in violation of the act of congress &c. ..... evidence shows that the chief if not the sole ownership of the brig was in carrera. ..... the burdett, and never heard either of them assert any ownership or interest in the vessel. ..... was filed in the district court of the united states on 1 october, 1832, against the brig burdett, alleging her to have been forfeited to the united states for a violation of the registry acts, she being owned in whole or in part by a foreigner, a subject of the king of spain. ..... concerns his own interest, as his oath, if received, would go directly to establish or to refute the important point of ownership of the vessel. ..... were to be treated as a mere agent, he might have been examined as a witness and compelled to produce or swear to any letters in his possession which have a bearing on the ownership of the vessel. .....

Tag this Judgment!

1836

Harris Vs. Elliott

Court : US Supreme Court

..... jury, after particularly describing by metes and bounds, each lot, concludes in each case as follows: "which same tract of land, on our oaths, we appraise and value at _____," and the act of the legislature of massachusetts declares that such parts of the land so valued and paid for by the united states shall be forever vested in the united states, and shall and may be taken possession ..... harris not agreeing as to the value of the land so taken by the united states, the same was ascertained by a jury duly summoned according to the provisions of the act, and by the proceedings of the jury for that purpose and the return made thereupon, five lots of land were appraised, which belonged to page 35 u. s. ..... be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid that the value of all lands and buildings and other materials taken from any person by virtue of this act shall be determined by three persons mutually chosen for that purpose, one of which shall be appointed by the selectmen, or a committee chosen for that purpose, which person so appointed by the selectmen or ..... the united states, the real possessors and asserting an ownership of the property, took defense in the suit, being desirous of having the ..... freehold of the streets is not barred by the first section of the act of the legislature of massachusetts of 30 october, 1781. ..... the streets, so far as they were within the limits of the navy yard, were closed up and have ever since been discontinued, and have been used as apart of the navy yard. .....

Tag this Judgment!

1854

Stevens Vs. Gladding

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the substance of this enactment is incorporated into the 17th section of the patent act of july 4, 1836, so far as it related to inventors and so far as it related to the subject of patent rights is no longer in force proprio vigore, yet so far as it gave cognizance to the courts of the united states of cases of copyright, it still remains in force, and is the only law conferring equitable jurisdiction on those courts in such cases, for the 9th section of the act of february 3, 1831, protects manuscripts only. ..... 453 thereof as the purchaser can make by reason of the ownership of the thing he has bought; but not the right to a use thereof, by reason of the ownership of something else which he has not bought and which belongs to a third ..... , our conclusion is that the mere ownership of a copperplate of a map by the owner of the copyright does not attach to the plate the exclusive right of printing and publishing the map held under the act of congress, or any part thereof, but the incorporeal right subsists wholly separate from and independent of the plate, and does not pass with it by a sale thereof on ..... of stereotype plates is an established business, and the ownership of the plates of a book under copyright may be, and doubtless in practice is, separated from the ownership of the copyright. ..... the ownership of a plate and the ownership of the copyright are distinct species of property, and the plate may be used without infringing upon the copyright of printing and publishing the .....

Tag this Judgment!

1860

United States Vs. Castro

Court : US Supreme Court

..... from the edge of the snowy mountains, following downstream -- having previously made the necessary investigations, i have, by a decree of this day, granted to the said senor the eleven sitios he prays for, declaring to him the ownership thereof by these present letters, in conformity with the law of august 18, 1824, and the regulations of 21 november, 1828, in conformity with the powers with which i find myself invested by the supreme government, in the name of the ..... and even if the witness who proves the handwriting of pio pico and of moreno is entitled to belief, yet the conclusion would seem to be irresistible that the paper was fraudulently antedated but apart from these circumstances, the grant is invalid, and not supported by legal proof, even if all the testimony adduced by the claimants was credible and the witnesses above suspicion. ..... , have been lost or destroyed; and 3dly, he must support this proof by showing that within a reasonable time after the grant was made, there was a judicial survey of the land and actual possession by him by acts of ownership exercised over it. ..... the survey and possession are open and public acts, and would support the parol evidence of its former existence and destruction or loss. .....

Tag this Judgment!

1862

Mississippi and Missouri Railroad Company Vs. Ward

Court : US Supreme Court

..... complainant has the right as claimed in all parts of said river; and avers that the right to build a bridge is as sacred as the right of navigation where no material obstruction is created, and denies that the treaties, acts of congress and principles of law prevent the construction of a bridge; denies that the navigation has been obstructed or rendered dangerous and difficult by the erection of a bridge, as alleged; that the waterway is one thousand three hundred ..... to the danger of navigation, he has been compelled to pay largely increased premiums for insurance occasioned solely by the bridge. ..... he seeks redress of a continuing trespass and wrong against himself, and acts in behalf of all others who are or may be injured; nor is there more necessity for joining with his partners in the prosecution than there is for his joining in the suit any other person as complainant ..... defendant neither admits or denies the ownership of said page 67 u. s ..... he avers that he has, by the treaties with france in 1803, the acts of congress, and the universal principle recognized by the common law, a right to the free and unobstructed navigation of the river in all parts of ..... the private party, though nominally suing on his own account, acts rather as a public prosecutor on behalf of all who are or may be injured. ..... the amount of lumber rafted down the river is great, but avers that rafts do not usually exceed seventy feet in width, while the piers of the bridge are two hundred and fifty feet apart. .....

Tag this Judgment!

1863

United States Vs. Moreno

Court : US Supreme Court

..... plat of the land i occupy provisionally, called santa rosa, i hereby, with the deepest submission, accompany my petition and the plat, that your excellency may have the goodness to make out the title deed of ownership to me of the land bordering on temecula, the lagoon, and santa margarita, not naming the number of leagues, as i might be mistaken, but i ask that the land which has no owner, and which i demand in due form, be set ..... after the acquisition, he presented a petition to the board of commissioners established by the act of congress of 3 march, 1851, to ascertain and settle private land claims in california, to have his title confirmed, pursuant to the provisions of that statute. ..... the act of march 3, 1851, was passed to assure to the inhabitants of the ceded territory the benefit of the rights of property thus secured to them. ..... the act of march 3, 1851, to ascertain and settle private land claims in the state of california, was passed to assure to the inhabitants of the ceded territory the benefit of the rights thus secured to them. .....

Tag this Judgment!

1864

Kutter Vs. Smith

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the agreement to purchase means nothing more than that in a certain event, the lessor will pay the lessee the value of such building, but there is no implication of any general title or ownership in the lessee apart from that event. ..... we have already seen that the law imposes upon the defendant no obligation to pay for the building apart from the contract. ..... that the act of defendant in reentering and possessing himself of the premises for plaintiff's failure to pay rent imposes upon him no obligation to pay plaintiff the value of the building. .....

Tag this Judgment!

1864

Banks Vs. Ogden

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the court said: "in the case of a valid plat," that is, a plat duly executed, acknowledged, and recorded, "the title to the ground set apart for public purposes is held by the corporation for the use and benefit of the public; in the case of a dedication by a different mode, the fee continues in the proprietor, burdened with the public easement. ..... there is no express limitation upon sales, nor any limitation upon any action other than suits, by the assignee except a general requirement in the tenth section that all proceedings shall, if practicable, be brought to a close by the court within two years after decree. ..... it is necessary here to state that the bankrupt act, under which banks, the plaintiff, claimed, enacts, by its eighth section, that "no suit at law or in equity shall in any case be maintained by or against the assignee of the bankrupt touching any property or rights of property of the bankrupt, page 69 u. s. ..... the case was thus: kinzie, being owner in fee of a fractional section of land bounded on the east by the said lake and lying immediately north of the original town of chicago, made a subdivision of it in 1833, which he called kinzie's addition, and deposited a plat of it in the office of the county recorder, ..... the limitation of the 8th section of the bankrupt act of 1841 does not apply to suits by assignees or their grantees for the recovery of real estate until after two years from the taking of adverse possession. ..... the controversy turns on ownership. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //