Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: anand marriage act 1909 section 5 non Court: jharkhand Page 1 of about 3,646 results (0.092 seconds)

Krishna Sahu Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... the learned court below it is evident that the learned trial court has held that as per the custom governing the parties second marriage was permissible but in view of section 5 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 the said marriage was not valid hence in terms of section 125, o.p. no.02, is not entitled to maintenance. it is amply clear ..... custom prevalent in the community of o.p. no.02 and petitioner, second marriage was permissible and the petitioner and o.p. no.02 led conjugal life and a daughter was born from the ..... the witnesses as also the documents produced, has held that the marriage of o.p. no.02 was not valid as the petitioner's first marriage with aashrita devi was subsisting at the time of marriage of o.p. no.02 with the petitioner accordingly, in terms of section 5 of the hindu marriage act. however, the court below has held that as per the .....

Ajay Kumar Dubey Vs. Smt. Sushma Devi

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : I(2005)DMC92; [2004(4)JCR197(Jhr)]

..... the ground of cruelty and mental agony to the husband. but, in the instant case, the suit has also been filed under section 13 of the hindu marriage act and, therefore conversion of this petition into divorce petition is not required. in the aforesaid case the high court has considered several facts before allowing the petition of ..... favour of the respondent. the application was filed under section 12(1)(d) and under section 13(1)(a) of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (act no. 25 of 1955) for annulling and dissolving the marriage of the applicant and the respondent by passing a decree of divorce. the learned court below, on the pleadings of the parties, ..... -wife pregnant by some person other than the appellant but thereafter the appellant amended the suit and added additional grounds for annulment of marriage under section 13(1)(i-a) of the hindu marriage act, 1955 and the prayer was allowed. the appellant thereafter added another ground of divorce as cruelty being meted out with the appellant .....

Pradeep Kuamr Roy and Ors Vs. Land Reforms and Revenue Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... right or personal or future enjoyment of (an estate), to grant, endow, clothe with a particular authority, right of property, (2) to become legally vested; (tp act) vesting order. an order under statutory authority whereby property is transferred to and vested, without conveyance in some person or persons; 26. black s law dictionary (6th ..... . learned counsel for the respondents have also taken the plea of availability of alternative remedy of appeal against the impugned order under section 215 of cnt act. considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties in some detail, relevant materials facts pleaded and perused the impugned order. ordinarily, the remedy of ..... newspaper on 3rd june, 2014, the land vested in the central government free from all encumbrances. the proceedings initiated under section 46(3 4) of the act, 1908 was not maintainable. the lands which vested in the central government would not be made subject matter of restoration. national highway authorities of india ltd .....

Madheshwar Dhari Singh and Krishnadeo Das Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(2)JCR404(Jhr)]

..... institution is bound to frame and follow an uniform rule for superannuating its employees. the employer is under statutory obligation to uniformly apply the provisions of the acts and rules to its employees. the central government is also supposed to apply the rule of superannuation uniformly to all similarly situated employees. 14. in the ..... of state of jharkhand rule 73 having been amended. in the meantime, the central government issued different notifications under section 72(2) of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000, finally allocating the services to one or other employees under one or other successor state including those who retired in the meantime from state of bihar ..... 15th november, 2000, the employees were provisionally allocated the successor state of bihar or jharkhand under sub-section (1) to section 72 of the bihar reorganisation act, 2000. the persons who were posted in one or other office falling within the territory of successor state of bihar or jharkhand, in absence of a .....

Nagendra Kumar Sharma Alias Narendra Kumar Alias Banti Sharma Vs. The ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... that since the matrimonial suit before the court below at durgapur has been fixed for 15.12.2017, on which date, the application under section 13(b) of the hindu marriage act as already agreed upon by the parties shall also be filed, necessary application with respect to operating of locker shall also be made by the father of the opp. party ..... the parties have agreed that on the next date of hearing i.e. on 15.12.2017, they shall file an application under section 13(b) of the hindu marriage act for getting the marriage dissolved on mutual consent. further, a case under section 498a of the indian penal code is also pending at durgapur instituted by the opp. party no.2 and ..... coming out from jail, he had instituted a complaint case, which is by way of retaliation, in which allegation has been levelled that the petitioner no.2 has solemnized marriage with the petitioner no.1 whereas the petitioner no.1 in fact had given shelter to the petitioner no.2 when she had gone to visit ayodhya. so far as .....

Lalita Devi and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... services authority, ranchi. from its perusal, it appears that matter has been settled between the parties (one time settlement) by way of divorce under section 13(b) of the hindu marriage act on the terms and conditions nos. (a to j), which shall be part of this order. today, an interlocutory application has also been filed without number. office is directed ..... to g.r. no. 919 of 2016, for the offence registered under sections 324, 326, 307/34 of the indian penal code and under section 27 of the arms act. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is not named in f.i.r and his name has been transpired in the confessional statement of co accused. it ..... g.r. no. 555 of 2015, for the offence registered under sections 498a, 406, 323 of the indian penal code and under section 3/4 of the d.p. act. pursuant to order dated 28.07.2016, the matter was referred to the jharkhand state legal services authority, ranchi for conciliation. perused the report dated 16.08.2016 of the .....

Ramkewal Paswn Alias Kush Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... 498a, 323, 506 and 34 of the indian penal code. it appears that petitioner has filed a matrimonial suit no. 24/2016 u/s 9 of the hindu marriage act for restitution of conjugal right on 03.12.2016 i.e much prior to lodging of the instant fir. it further appears that petitioner is husband of the victim ..... for that reason she is insisting the petitioner to leave separately from his parents. it is also informed by the victim-informant that petitioner is going to perform second marriage with another girl. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, i am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is ..... had also tried to kill her by pouring kerosene oil on the body of the o.p. no.2. lastly it is alleged that the petitioner has solemnized second marriage in which other accused persons had also involved. this fact has also been supported by other witnesses. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, i am not inclined to .....

Jamuna Das Sharda Vs. Smt. Rita Lal and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

..... was present. it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had filed a divorce petition u/s 13 (b) of hindu marriage act, which was allowed by the family court, godda. learned app opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. in the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to ..... .r. no. 472 of 2016, in the case registered under sections 498 (a)/341/323/504/506 of the indian penal code and sections 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act. on 19.06.2017 both the parties were directed to remain physically present before the court. but o.p. no.2 was not present counsel for o.p. no. 2 ..... . v.n. tiwary, a heart-chest specialist, ranchi, since 1991. an another interlocutory application being i.a. no. 2685 of 2017 has been filed u/s 5 of the limitation act on behalf of the applicant/legal heir of the deceased stating therein that the sole appellant (yamuna prasad sarda) now deceased, father of the applicant herein, has filed the present .....

Sangeeta Kumari Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... ranchi shall allow the petitioner to cross-examine the said witness. ii. the petitioner is not entitled to the maintenance/interim alimony under section 24 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 during the period she has been getting the maintenance under section 125 cr.p.c. iii. the learned principal judge, family court, ranchi shall provide due ..... get maintenance simultaneously, rather, he/she would be entitled to get only the higher amount of maintenance out of both the provisions. section 24 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 has been introduced with a laudable object of ensuring maintenance to a party to the proceeding so as to enable him/her to maintain during the ..... from perusal of the aforesaid judgments, it would emerge that although the provision for granting maintenance under section 125 cr.p.c and section 24 of the hindu marriage act are different, the husband is not obliged to pay maintenance twice rather he is only required to pay higher amount amongst the two. thus, the argument of .....

Tulsi Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand and Gunjari Devi

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2008(1)JCR145(Jhr)]

..... ,the p.w.-5 gunjari devi has herself given out her age as 16 years and it is said that she was married 7/8 years back when the hindu marriage act, 1955 was in force. according to her statement she was wedded when she was 8/9 years old. the. hindu legislature for her maintenance in a proceeding under ..... devi in view of her admission that she was aged about 7-8 years at the relevant time of marriage and hence it was held that she was not under permissible age according to hindu marriage act, 1955 to enter into contract of marriage and hence it was void.6. learned counsel for gunjari devi submitted that she was married to tulsi ..... . for the purpose of section 125 of code of criminal procedure, the standard of proof of marriage should not be as high as under hindu marriage act for divorce or under sections 494/ 495/ 497/498 of indian penal code. learned principal judge further observed that when marriage was established, maintenance should be awarded and that the legal validity of the alleged .....