Court : Jharkhand Ranchi
..... home. the husband persuaded her and requested to come back and join his society but of no avail and finally he filed a petition under section 9 of the hindu marriage act before the court of district judge, gurgaon, haryana for the restitution of conjugal rights, at the place where he was posted in service but after about three months, in ..... circumstances raised loan from her g.p.f. account and managed to pay rs. 9 lakhs and 100 grams gold to them during intervening period of her engagement and marriage. the petitioner, who is the father-in-law of rimjhim jha stated that as per statement of the daughter of the o.p.no.2, who was his daughter ..... a prima facie case and directed the processes to be issued against the o.p.no.2- bibhuti bhushan jha for the offence under section 3 of the dowry prohibition act.3. mr. b.m.tripathy, learned sr. counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the learned additional judicial commissioner, ranchi without appreciating the materials on the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand Ranchi
..... had filed a matrimonial suit before the court of principal judge, family court, siwan vide divorce case no.70/10 under section 13(1) (a,b) of the hindu marriage act seeking a decree of divorce as against the opposite party- wife who had deserted him and was declined to join the society of her husband for years together and on ..... by her husband manish kumar on 28.2.2010 where she was brutally assaulted by him who returned back alone extending threats to the complainant that he would solemnize second marriage with another girl if she would come to delhi without fulfilling the demands and she was finally deserted by her husband on 28.2.2010. complaint was filed when ..... kumar on 20.4.2008 and huge amount in cash was given to the father-in-law of the complainant besides, utensils and further cash in different heads. after the marriage was solemnized at bokaro steel city, she was taken to her matrimonial home, situated at village fatehpur in the district of siwan (bihar) where she was tortured in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand Ranchi
..... the lower court (additional chief judicial magistrate, ghatsila) and subject to the conditions that he shall:-(a) not take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty; (b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution; (c) maintain law and order;(d) shall mark his presence before ghatsila police station on every first day of english ..... 2008 for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 of the indian penal code, section 27 of the arms act, section 17 of the c.l.a. act and sections 3 and 4 of the explosive substance act, pending in the court of learned additional chief judicial magistrate, ghatsila.2. learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand Ranchi
..... hazaribagh in connection with complaint case no. 572 of 2005 corresponding to t.r. no. 1217 of 2006 against the petitioner under section 138 of the negotiable instrument act and order of sentence passed against him was affirmed and his appeal was dismissed.2. by the said judgment petitioner was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period ..... and that both have already entered into compromise and they were ready to compound the offence as per provisions of composition under section 147 of the negotiable instrument act. a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the o.p. no.2 nand kishore sah wherein admitted that he had entered into compromise with the ..... law- making and therefore an intrusion into thelegislative domain. it must be kept in mind that section 147 of the act does not carry any guidance on how to proceed with the compounding ofoffences under the act. we have already explained that the scheme contemplated under section 320 cr.p.c. cannot be followed in the strict .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand Ranchi
..... he lost in appeal. even after rejection of the said application, the petitioner did not vacate the quarter. therefore, the said eviction case under public premises (eviction of unauthorized occupants) act, 1971 was filed by the respondent company before the estate officer. in spite of service of notice, the petitioner did not chose to appear. however, the petitioner filed the said .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand Ranchi
..... ) had preferred title appeal no. 44 of 2006 and they had also preferred another application under section 15 of the bihar building (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1982 and in this application, order was passed to the effect that whatever order is passed by the trial court dated 16th august, 2004 is maintained by the lower ..... no. 44 of 2006, below an application preferred by the present petitioners (original plaintiffs/appellants) under section 15 of the bihar building (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1982.(vi) looking to the order passed by the trial court dated 16 th august, 2004, which is at annexure5 to the memo of the present petition, it ..... the order passed by the trial court as well as the lower appellate court, below an application under section 15 of the bihar building (lease, rent and eviction) control act, 1982, is just, proper, equitable and is in consonance with the law. more particularly, looking to the dispute, which is already settled by some another court in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand Ranchi
..... 10.5.2011 after the appeal was dismissed by the sessions judge, for their conviction under sections 498a of the indian penal code and section 4 of the dowry prohibition act.the other convicts rama prajapati and lachhu prajapati @ lakshu prajapati ,who were the husband and father-in-law of the complainant sabita devi respectively, have been acquitted by this court ..... 1. the instant application has been filed under section 5 of the limitation act for condonation of 8 days delay in filing this cr. revision. having been satisfied with the grounds taken and explanations made therein , delay in filing this cr. revision is condoned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand Ranchi
..... cold drink and subsequently the petitioner discovered that his signature was used by the complainant and her friends in procuring marriage certificate illegally from the marriage officer of the purulia district and for that suit was filed under section 25 of the special marriage act 1954.however,the said suit was transferred to the court of principal judge family court ranchi where it was ..... purulia district where none of the parties ordinarily resided, an essential ingredient under the provision of section 25 of the special marriage act.6. mr. delip zerath, the learned counsel appearing for the o.p. no.2 strongly controverted that marriage between parties cannot be denied which finds support from the admission of the husband petitioner that he filed petition under section 25 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand Ranchi
..... law.4. heard learned counsel for the parties also on the application for condo nation of delay ( i.a. no. 1248 of 2011) filed under section-5 of the limitation act.5. in view of the reasons stated in the condo nation application, supported with affidavit, the delay in filing the appeal, challenging the order dated 4th february,2010, is condoned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand Ranchi
..... section 3(1) (x) of the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 would tantamount to miscarriage of justice. i further find that the informant was a party to the proceeding initiated under section 107 of the code of criminal procedure ..... i find and observe that the ingredients to constitute an offence under section 3(1) (x) of the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 is not attracted against the petitioner as the alleged occurrence did not take place within "public view" , as such the criminal proceeding of the petitioner under ..... at the outset submitted that charge-sheet was submitted only under section 3(1) (x) of the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act and not under section 385 of the indian penal code and in that manner, extortion of money, which is the genesis of the case, has been disbelieved .....
Tag this Judgment!