Analysis - Judgment Search Results

Union of India and anr. Vs. M. Mariaprakasa Mudaliar Sons Karur

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1972Mad140

1 the defendant in o s 295 of 1963 on the file of the court of the district munsif karur...

The Management of Madras Vs. the Workmen of Madras and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1972)1MLJ117

k veeraswami c j 1 the appeal arises from an order of kailasam j holding that the appellant the madras...

A. Rafeeq Ahmed and Co. Vs. the Union of India and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1972Mad454

the plaintiff in o s no 450 of 1964 on the file of the city civil court madras who succeeded...

Hari Sankar Banerjee Vs. Corporation of Calcutta

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1973CriLJ1264

..... on that account it is also challenged that the process of analysis adopted for determining iron contents was wrong and unscientific leading to ..... the sample sent to him giving rise to an opinion after analysis that it was adulterated infant food of the description and ..... the basic material the public analyst in giving his opinion after analysis of the sample was misled by the description of the sample .....

Union of India (Uoi) Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Industr ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1971)2MLJ502

..... them covered further margins of profit may become available 12 the tariff commission on ultimate analysis grouped the various units under three broad categories on the basis of the return on ..... affidavit of mr aggarwal general manager of dalmia cement bharat ltd has extracted these working analysis of the three units aforesaid india cements ltd the factory is at sankarnagar talaiyuthu railway .....

United States Vs. White

Court: US Supreme Court

..... rationale underlying on lee strikingly illuminates the deficiencies of the plurality opinion s retroactivity analysis a on lee involved circumstances virtually identical to those now before us there ..... enforcement agencies engaging in electronic eavesdropping and the public generally by casting its risk analysis solely in terms of the expectations and risks that wrongdoers or one contemplating .....

The Public Prosecutor Vs. Veeramalla Veerareddy

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1972CriLJ1127

..... the preservative the total period which may be available for making analysis without decomposition will be six months in the present case no ..... the accused sent to the director of central food laboratory for analysis at any time the accused has not availed of the ..... of the public analyst is final and conclusive evidence of the analysis contained in it therefore in the absence of the certificate of .....

Ram Gopal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1972SC656; 1972CriLJ473; (1972)4SCC625; 1972(4)LC304(SC)

..... the cot he therefore made a panchnama and collected the vomit for analysis the appellant produced the tumbler in which he had served water ..... he produced ext 38 which contained the results of his detailed analysis but the same which is couched in scientific terms does not ..... tea and that vomit was sent to the chemical analyser for analysis dr drshpacde admits that in such a case the vomit should .....

Madhya Pradesh Mines Ltd. (Now Madhya Pradesh Industries Ltd.) Vs. Rai ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC1983; 1971MhLJ952; (1972)3SCC180; 1971(III)LC682(SC)

..... buyers will pay to the sellers the full value based on the analysis ascertained and final settlement will be based on the railway weighbridge ..... on both the sellers and buyers the cost of sampling and analysis as referred to hereinabove will be borne equally by the sellers ..... at calcutta and if the buyers did not accept that offer the analysis made by m s hughes and davies would become final the .....

Mackey Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... invoked by the litigants is irrelevant in any event i find the implications of the analysis underlying that dissent startling for example that congress currently provides that statutory repeal shall not ..... direct and collateral review as if they were of one piece seems to me faulty analysis ignoring as it does the jurisprudential considerations that differentiate the two kinds of adjudicatory .....