Analysis - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: analysis Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 314 results (0.221 seconds)Brindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India
Court: Karnataka
..... period from one year to six months especially in the absence of sufficient data and analysis of the said data 187 obviously a decision rendered by the aptel to the effect .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...
Court: Karnataka
..... appeal is not a right which can be assumed by logical analysis much less by exercise of inherent jurisdiction it essentially should be ..... of the provisions by implication 38 in light of the above analysis the only reasonable interpretation of section 16 of the act is ..... appeal is not created such right cannot be assumed by logical analysis or in a situation where there is no provision restricting such .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
1 nc 2024 khc 49110 wp no 55559 of 2017 r in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Syed Adil Basha Quadri Vs. Syed Azadullah
Court: Karnataka
..... lj1980 2 hc db contending as above sought for dismissal of the appeals discussion and analysis 21 heard and perused the records regarding substantial question of law no 1 whether the ..... 1995 has no retrospective application cannot be countenanced 25 conclusion from the above discussion and analysis the substantial question of law no 1 is answered as under a exclusion of jurisdiction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyed Mohammed Ghouse Pasha Quadri Vs. Syed Yaseen Pasha Khadri Since D ...
Court: Karnataka
..... lj1980 2 hc db contending as above sought for dismissal of the appeals discussion and analysis 21 heard and perused the records regarding substantial question of law no 1 whether the ..... 1995 has no retrospective application cannot be countenanced 25 conclusion from the above discussion and analysis the substantial question of law no 1 is answered as under a exclusion of jurisdiction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyed Mohammed Ghouse Pasha Quadri Vs. Syed Yaseen Pasha Khadri Since D ...
Court: Karnataka
..... lj1980 2 hc db contending as above sought for dismissal of the appeals discussion and analysis 21 heard and perused the records regarding substantial question of law no 1 whether the ..... 1995 has no retrospective application cannot be countenanced 25 conclusion from the above discussion and analysis the substantial question of law no 1 is answered as under a exclusion of jurisdiction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Syed Aslam Pasha Khadri Vs. Sri Syed Mohammed Ghouse Pasha Quadri
Court: Karnataka
..... lj1980 2 hc db contending as above sought for dismissal of the appeals discussion and analysis 21 heard and perused the records regarding substantial question of law no 1 whether the ..... 1995 has no retrospective application cannot be countenanced 25 conclusion from the above discussion and analysis the substantial question of law no 1 is answered as under a exclusion of jurisdiction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri Darshan Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
..... accused persons at the time and date of crime etc a detailed analysis of all these circumstantial evidence cannot be 42 nc 2024 khc ..... as to safeguard the sanctity of the investigation 45 on the above analysis to give true meaning and purpose to the constitutional and the ..... in the background of the judgments referred to above and the brief analysis of the material on record i am of the opinion that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChannakeshava B Tingarikar Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation
Court: Karnataka
..... trustworthiness of the approver and the high court failed to do so 33 a careful analysis of the statement of the approver given at the trial coupled with the circumstances under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.dinesh.m Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation
Court: Karnataka
..... trustworthiness of the approver and the high court failed to do so 33 a careful analysis of the statement of the approver given at the trial coupled with the circumstances under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial