Allocable - Judgment Search Results

Patasibai and ors. Vs. Ratanlal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1990)92BOMLR228; JT1990(3)SC68; 1990(1)SCALE279; (1990)2SCC42; [1990]1SCR172

..... he the 73 spill over appointments were made there were no allocated or earmarked posts to which those promotees could have been ..... was still undecided this circumstance coupled with the absence of clear allocation of posts made it impossible for the promotees to lay claim ..... any appointment as invalid on the ground that there was no allocated post for those appointees treated as spill over because under .....

Guvala China Venkatesu and Another Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC1926; 1991CriLJ2326; 1991Supp(2)SCC727

..... he the 73 spill over appointments were made there were no allocated or earmarked posts to which those promotees could have been ..... was still undecided this circumstance coupled with the absence of clear allocation of posts made it impossible for the promotees to lay claim ..... any appointment as invalid on the ground that there was no allocated post for those appointees treated as spill over because under .....

Manipal Industries Ltd. Vs. Comissioner of Income-tax

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1991)95CTR(Kar)102; [1991]188ITR445(KAR); [1991]188ITR445(Karn); 1991(1)KarLJ311

..... article 229 cyriac joseph cj a n venugopala gowda jj power of chief justice to allocate the work held it is a prerogative exercise of such power cannot be held to .....

Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe, Minority Communities and Backward Cl ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1990KAR1456

..... work from labour co operative societies requiring them to quote lowest rates held the proposed allocation defeats national forest policy and is not sustainable it is stated that according to rule .....

Vishwa Bharathi House Building Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Bangalore ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1990KAR1479; 1990(1)KarLJ392

..... work from labour co operative societies requiring them to quote lowest rates held the proposed allocation defeats national forest policy and is not sustainable it is submitted that even otherwise the .....

Majeet Singh, UDC and others Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corpn. and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC1104; JT1990(2)SC180; (1990)IILLJ392SC; 1990(1)SCALE525; (1990)2SCC367; [1990]2SCR119; 1990(1)LC601(SC); (1990)3UPLBEC1527

..... it was obligatory on its part to bring the same to the notice of the allocate having not done so it relying on or on the basis of the purported office .....

S.V. Sivaswami Servai Vs. Hafez Motor Transport (Firm) and Others,

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC911; JT1990(3)SC518; (1991)1MLJ29(SC); 1990(2)SCALE275; (1990)4SCC459; [1990]3SCR802

..... it was obligatory on its part to bring the same to the notice of the allocate having not done so it relying on or on the basis of the purported office .....

Portland Golf Club Vs. Commissioner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... determining what portions of its fixed expenses were attributable to nonmember sales petitioner employed an allocation formula described as the gross to gross method based on the ratio that nonmember ..... percentage of fixed costs properly attributable to nonmember sales the parties however stipulated that this allocation method was reasonable id at 17 footnote 5 the following table shows petitioner s .....

Ramesh Chand Paliwal Vs. the State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1990WLN(UC)496

..... vote test his lordship referred to the percentage of marks allocated for the cases of selections to the indian administrative service ..... the consequence of prescribing and obtaining of 40 of aggregate marks allocated for written examination before a candidate could be called for ..... they have to obtain 45 marks of the aggregate marks allocated for written examination and interview we also leave it for .....

Metro Broadcasting Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and behavior reflect their background but the constitution provides that the government may not allocate benefits and burdens among individuals based on the assumption that race or ethnicity determines ..... rather than the asserted interest in diversity of broadcast viewpoints the constitution clearly prohibits allocating valuable goods such as broadcast licenses simply on the basis of race see bakke .....