Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 14 amendment of section 11b Page 8 of about 351 results (0.113 seconds)

Ajay Agarwal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1992SC1637; 1993(2)ALT(Cri)396; [1994]79CompCas1(SC); 1993CriLJ2516; 1993(2)Crimes342(SC); JT1993(3)SC203; 1993(2)SCALE757; (1993)3SCC609; [1993]3SCR543

..... to take cognizance of an offence punishable under section 120-b etc. i.p.c. or to proceed with trial in chapter va, conspiracy was brought on statute by the amendment act, 1913 (8 of 1913). section 120-a of the i.p.c. defines 'conspiracy' to mean that when two or more persons agree to do, or cause to be done ..... has ensued. section 188 by fiction dealt offences committed by a citizen of india or a foreigner outside india or on high seas or elsewhere or on any ship or aircraft registered in india. such person was directed to be dealt with, in respect of such offences, as if he had committed at any place within india at which he may ..... is committed outside india-(a) by a citizen of india, whether on the high seas or elsewhere;or(b) by a person, not being such citizen, on any ship or aircraft registered in india, he may be dealt with in respect of such offence as if it had been committed at any place within india at which he may be found .....

Fatma Bibi Ahmed Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2008SC2392; 2008(2)ALD(Cri)381; 2008(2)ALT(Cri)350; 2008CriLJ3065; (2008)3GLR2468(SC); 2008(2)KLT907(SC); RLW2008(2)SC1664; 2008(7)SCALE519; (2008)6SCC789; 2008AIRSCW3962(2008)3SCC(Cri)151; 2008(3)AICLR480; 2008(4)Supreme308; 2008(3)KCCRSN188

..... offence punishable under section 120b etc. i.p.c. or to proceed with trial in chapter va, conspiracy was brought on statute by the amendment act, 1913 (8 of 1913). section 120a of the i.p.c. defines 'conspiracy' to mean that when two or more persons agree ..... the high seas or elsewhere, or by a person, although not citizen of india when the offence is committed on any ship or aircraft registered in india.in view of the fact that the offence is said to have been committed in kuwait, the provisions of the ..... the accused is a citizen of india even if the offence was committed outside india or by any person on any ship or aircraft registered in india wherever it may be. neither of the aforementioned contingencies is attracted in the instant case. section 188 of the ..... india, whether on the high seas or elsewhere; or(b) by a person, not being such citizen, on any ship or aircraft registered in india, he may be dealt with in respect of such offence as if it had been committed at any place within india .....

Jankovich Vs. Indiana Toll Road Comm'n

Court : US Supreme Court

..... decision, and we so hold. petitioners nevertheless contend that the state ground of decision is not adequate, because it is inconsistent with the policy of the federal airport act, 60 stat. 170, as amended, 49 u.s.c. 1101 et seq. (1958 ed. and supp. v), and therefore founders on the supremacy clause. [ footnote 2 ] page 379 u ..... restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations including landing and take-off of aircraft." p.l. 88-280, 1964 u.s.code cong. & adm.news 514. (emphasis added.) that requirement, however, is presently implemented by the federal aviation agency ..... , which, with regard to buildings and other structures in the immediate vicinity of the airport, prescribes height limitations based upon a 40-to-1 glide angle for approaching aircraft ( i.e., at a distance of 40 feet from the end of the planned runway, structures may not exceed one foot in height). after passage of the .....

United States Vs. Turley

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the theft constitutes common law larceny. reversed and remanded. [ footnote 1 ] 18 u.s.c. 2312. the original act, sponsored by representative l. c. dyer of missouri, became law in 1919. 41 stat. 324. it was amended, in 1945, to include aircraft, 59 stat. 536, and was reenacted, in 1948, as part of the criminal code, 62 stat. 806. [ ..... 352 u. s. 413 -417. (e) a different result is not required by the fact that, after 1948, the department of justice proposed various clarifying amendments to the act, and several of these amendments have passed one house of congress without coming to a vote in the other. p. 415, n 14. 141 f.supp. 527 reversed and remanded. ..... footnote 2 ] as amended, the information charged that -- "on or about january 20, 1956 at columbia, south carolina," " james vernon .....

Faa Administrator Vs. Robertson

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , or at least of the practical compatibility, of both statutes. reversed. page 422 u. s. 268 [ footnote 1 ] 419 u.s. 1067 (1974) [ footnote 2 ] the act was amended in 1974, pub.l. 93-502, 88 stat. 1561, to read in pertinent part: "(a) each agency shall make available to the public information as follows:" " * * * ..... congress." [ footnote 5 ] the respondents had also sought disclosure of mechanical reliability reports, which are daily reports of mechanical malfunctions submitted to the faa by the aircraft companies. on january 11, 1972, the administrator determined that he would permit the disclosure of such documents received after april 18, 1972. the district court's ..... , kokoszka v. belford, 417 u. s. 642 , 417 u. s. 650 (1974). we have construed the freedom of information act recently in nlrb v. sears, roebuck & co., 421 u. s. 132 (1975); renegotiation board v. grumman aircraft & engineering corp., 421 u. s. 168 (1975); renegotiation board v. bannercraft clothing co., 415 u. s. 1 (1974); .....

Adarsh Metal Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1993(67)ELT483(Raj)

..... such plea in the petition. on this ground also, the respondents are not entitled to retain the amount by refusing refund with recourse to the provisions newly inserted by the amendment act of 1991.in this connection, a decision of the high court of judicature for madras may be referred to, reported in 1992 (59) e.l.t. 345 (mad.) - indo swiss ..... may be, the excisable materials used in the manufacture of such goods -(i) if the goods are exported by sea or air, the date on which the ship or the aircraft in which such goods are loaded, leaves india, or(ii) if the goods are exported by land, the date on which such goods pass the frontier,(iii) if the goods ..... may be, the excisable materials used in the manufacture of such goods, -(i) if the goods are exported by sea or air, the date on which the ship or the aircraft in which such goods are loaded, leaves india, or(ii) if the goods are exported by land, the date on which such goods pass the frontier, or(iii) if the .....

Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Vs. Amit Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... vehicles. the excluded contractual rights do not depend on the type of contracts in which they are embodied. 124 however, according to the explanatory memorandum to the amending act, the stay is not intended to restrict a counterparty from enforcing a right (or disapply self-executing provisions) for any other reason, such as a breach ..... reading by the appellate authority and the adjudicating authority, that had passed orders preventing recovery by stock exchanges and regulators, as well as the de-registration of aircrafts. 8.7. relying on this, the committee was of the view that termination or suspension of such grants during the moratorium period would be prevented by section ..... of german law on the validity of such clauses was never entirely settled judicially94. j.2.6 greece 114 article 32 of the bankruptcy code (law 3588/2007) states that there would be no prejudice to the counter contracting party's rights to rescind the contract, based on a clause that allows the rescission in .....

Auto Workers Vs. WisconsIn Board

Court : US Supreme Court

..... refrain from concerted labor activities, the national labor board might have issued an order similar to that of the state board. [ footnote 6 ] the provisions of the national labor relations act, as amended, cover the labor relations of the kohler company. labor board v. jones & laughlin steel corp., 301 u. s. 1 , 301 u. s. 31 . these provisions may ..... workers v. wisconsin board - 351 u.s. 266 (1956) u.s. supreme court auto workers v. wisconsin board, 351 u.s. 266 (1956) united automobile, aircraft & agricultural implement workers of america v. wisconsin employment relations board no. 530 argued april 24-25, 1956 decided june 4, 1956 351 u.s. 266 appeal from the supreme ..... 2d 191, affirmed. page 351 u. s. 267 mr. justice reed delivered the opinion of the court. this case, as stated in the brief for the united automobile, aircraft, and agricultural implement workers of america, presents the question whether or not a state may enjoin, through its labor statute, the wisconsin employment peace .....

Trans World Airlines, Inc. Vs. Thurston

Court : US Supreme Court

..... on certain long-distance flights, a fourth crew member, the "international relief officer," is in the cockpit. on some types of aircraft, there are only two cockpit positions. [ footnote 2 ] section 2(a) of the age discrimination in employment act amendments of 1978, pub.l. 95-256, 92 stat. 189, 29 u.s.c. 623(f)(2). [ footnote 3 ] ..... part of a "bona fide seniority system." see united air lines, inc. v. mcmann, 434 u. s. 192 (1977). on april 6, 1978, however, the act was amended to prohibit the mandatory retirement of a protected individual because of his age. [ footnote 2 ] twa officials page 469 u. s. 115 became concerned that the company's retirement ..... decided january 8, 1985 * 469 u.s. 111 certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit syllabus the age discrimination in employment act (adea) was amended in 1978 to prohibit the mandatory retirement of a protected employee because of his age. concerned that its retirement policy, at least as it applied to flight .....

Union of India and Others Vs. M/S. Ganesh Das Bhojraj

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC1102; 2000(68)ECC382; 2000(116)ELT431(SC); [2000]244ITR691(SC); JT2000(2)SC314; (2000)IIMLJ193(SC); 2000(2)SCALE17; (2000)9SCC461; [2000]1SCR1081; [2000]119STC293(

..... notification gold in through-transit from a place outside india to a place outside india which was not removed from the aircraft except for the purpose of transshipment. on 8th november, 1962 the reserve bank of india amended its earlier notification by prescribing the additional condition for exemption, viz., that the gold must be declared in the manifest ..... the same date.19. lastly, at this stage, we would mention that parliament has added sub-sections (4) and (5) to section 25 of the customs act by act no. 21 of 1998 w.e.f. 1-6-1998 which prescribe the method and mode of publication of the notification and the date on which it comes into ..... .7. in pankaj jain agencies : 1994ecr28(sc) (supra), this court considered -similar contention with regard to the exemption notification issued under section 25 of the customs act, 1962 and held that there was no substance in the contention that notwithstanding the publication of the notification in the official gazette there was yet a failure to make .....