Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 14 amendment of section 11b Court: sebi securities and exchange board of india or securities appellate tribunal sat Page 1 of about 7 results (2.223 seconds)

Sunil Krishna Khaitan and Others Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... any period of 12 months was permitted without incurring the obligation of making a public offer. the reference period provided therein being vague, sebi brought about the amendment of regulations on the basis of the following recommendation of the justice p.n. bhagwati committee report of 2002: the creeping acquisition limit may be reckoned with ..... for (h)regulating substantial acquisition of shares and take-over of companies; 19. at this stage, it is necessary to revert to the provisions of the amended sast regulations, 2011 relied upon by the learned wtm in the impugned order are as under:- sast regulations, 2011:- section 3 which deals with substantial acquisition ..... no point of time did the appellants violate the provisions of any law but for the two conversions on march 12, 2007. we also note from the records that the appellants have invariably acted in a bonafide manner by keeping the concerned stock exchanges and the respondent informed regarding the true happenings with respect to .....

Karvy Stock Broking Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in : (2007)73SCL261SAT

..... registration which may not be appropriate in all cases of defaults.19. as already observed, section 11 is the very heart and soul of the act. this provision has been periodically amended and today it is substantially different from what it was at its inception in the year 1992. the scope of the power has been considerably widened ..... market. the exercise of this power was challenged in different courts and even though the same was upheld, parliament thought that the provisions of the act were inadequate and in its wisdom amended section 11 by introducing sub section (4) therein with effect from 29.10.2002 and gave specific power to the board to pass interim as ..... his findings without being influenced by any observation made in the impugned order. he is further directed to complete the enquiry expeditiously but not later than 31st march, 2007.the board will then take a final decision thereon in accordance with law within two months thereafter.26. in the result, the appeal fails and the same is .....

Sebi Vs. Abhipra Capital Ltd.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... offices and their registered sub-brokers' offices. trading terminals granted earlier in places other than mentioned above should be withdrawn immediately. the stock exchanges shall amend their bye-laws accordingly to take action against the broker who mis-utilises or lets misutilisation of their trading terminals for unregistered sub-broking activities.4 ..... offices and their registered sub-brokers' offices. trading terminals granted earlier in places other than mentioned above should be withdrawn immediately. the stock exchanges shall amend their bye-laws accordingly to take action against the broker who mis-utilises or lets misutilisation of their trading terminals for unregistered sub-broking activities.2. ..... abundant precaution, their trading terminals were also suspended by bse and nse for a week (may 24-30, 2007). the above also raises serious concern on fit and proper requirement for acl acting in various capacities in the capital market.4.14 i note that sebi vide its order dated 13.08 .....

National Securities Depository Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of In ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in : (2007)74SCL821SAT

..... this section which read as under: (a) by an order of the board made, on and after the commencement of the securities laws (second amendment) act, 1999, under this act, or the rules or regulations made thereunder; or may prefer an appeal to a securities appellate tribunal having jurisdiction in the matter.a reading of ..... the impugned circular so as to avoid any problems in the live environment and ensure smooth implementation of the aforesaid decision. they were advised to make suitable amendments in their relevant bye-laws, rules and regulations to implement the decision of the board. it is this circular which is now under challenge.14. ..... such persons who have the requisite qualifications are to be appointed as members thereof as would appear from sub-section (2) of section 15m of the said act.... throughout the world, specialized adjudicators are performing numerous roles. there are diverse specialized tribunals in america as also in the commonwealth countries. in certain states, statutes .....

D-link (India) Limited Vs. the Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in : (2008)85SCL385SAT

..... buyback of shares was accepted and accordingly sections 77a, 77aa and 77b were inserted by the companies (amendment) act, 1999 and they provide for buy-back of its own securities by a company subject to the safeguards specified therein. these provisions as ..... 2002-03.5. after hearing the representative of the appellant the orders were reserved on 13.9.2006. by order dated 21.8.2007 the whole time member came to the conclusion that the charge levelled against the appellant stood established and recorded his findings in para 4. ..... board of india (buy-back of securities) regulations, 1998 ("buy-back regulations") (including any statutory modification(s) or re-enactment of the act or buy-back regulations, for the time being in force) and subject to such other approvals, permissions and sanctions as may be prescribed or imposed ..... 1. this appeal is directed against the order dated 21.8.2007 passed by the whole time member of the securities and exchange board of india (hereinafter referred to as .....

In Re: Shalibhadra Infosec Ltd.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... the sebi (futp) regulations, 1995, regulation 10 of the takeover regulations, and regulation 13 (3) of the sebi (insider trading) regulations, 1992 as amended in 2003.23. these additional charges are discussed and the provisions are reproduced below: 3. no person shall buy, sell or otherwise deal in securities in a ..... shalibhadra infosec ltd. and harsha jhaveri have applied for consent (in terms of sebi circular efd/ed/circular 1/2007 dated 20.04.2007) vide application nos. 39/2007 (dated july 17, 2007), 34/2007, 168/2007 and 124/2007 respectively for the scn dated february 9, 2005.16. in the instant case sil along with its chairman, ..... shah). the brokers delivered these shares in the market on behalf of entities like vinod desai, shah maheshbhai, pankaj c patel and mukesh gajjar. the persons acting in concert include - tushar jhaveri, atulbhai bachubhai shah, rajesh bachubhai shah, vinodbhai n desai, maulik prafulchandra patva & mukesh bachubhai vadecha.11. a diagrammatic representation .....

Dkg Buildcon Private Limited Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry Officer, ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... more deterrent. this provision was amended with effect from 29.10.2002 to provide for a penalty of one lac rupees for each day during which ..... rs.1.5 lacs. section 15a(a) of the act finds mention in chapter via of the act which was introduced in january 1995. the provision as it originally stood provided for a penalty not exceeding rs.1,50,000 for each such failure. this provision was amended by the amending act of 2002 which was meant to make the penalty ..... the provisions of regulation 11 for violating regulation 4 of the regulations which were subsequently replaced by the regulations of 2003. by a separate order dated october 16, 2007, the board found that large quantities of shares of stil were made available to entities associated with ketan parekh during the period between october, 2000 and april, 2001 .....