Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 13 amendment of section 11a Court: delhi Page 4 of about 165 results (0.100 seconds)

Nd Kathuria Vs. King Airways

Court : Delhi

..... . further in the present case the three pilots/workmen were appointed as commanders whose duties have been defined in the operation manual which included the safety of the aircraft and its occupants during the flight, authority to take such measures as are necessary in this regard and the commander was responsible for order and discipline on board. ..... adjournments were sought by the management to file reply. the management proceeded ex-parte which order was vacated and then further amendments of the pleadings were sought. however, in a petition under section 33-c (2) id act no new right can be conferred on the workman. thus no interest can be awarded. in union of india vs. ..... even being an examiner does not show that the workman was performing supervisory functions. reliance is placed on mathur aviation (supra) and cedric dsilva vs. union of india 2007 l.s.(bom) 725 to contend that pilot is a workman, his role is different from the captain of a ship. the contention of the management that in a .....

King Airways Vs. CaptaIn Pritam Singh

Court : Delhi

..... . further in the present case the three pilots/workmen were appointed as commanders whose duties have been defined in the operation manual which included the safety of the aircraft and its occupants during the flight, authority to take such measures as are necessary in this regard and the commander was responsible for order and discipline on board. ..... adjournments were sought by the management to file reply. the management proceeded ex-parte which order was vacated and then further amendments of the pleadings were sought. however, in a petition under section 33-c (2) id act no new right can be conferred on the workman. thus no interest can be awarded. in union of india vs. ..... even being an examiner does not show that the workman was performing supervisory functions. reliance is placed on mathur aviation (supra) and cedric dsilva vs. union of india 2007 l.s.(bom) 725 to contend that pilot is a workman, his role is different from the captain of a ship. the contention of the management that in a .....

Manjit Singh Vs. King Airways

Court : Delhi

..... . further in the present case the three pilots/workmen were appointed as commanders whose duties have been defined in the operation manual which included the safety of the aircraft and its occupants during the flight, authority to take such measures as are necessary in this regard and the commander was responsible for order and discipline on board. ..... adjournments were sought by the management to file reply. the management proceeded ex-parte which order was vacated and then further amendments of the pleadings were sought. however, in a petition under section 33-c (2) id act no new right can be conferred on the workman. thus no interest can be awarded. in union of india vs. ..... even being an examiner does not show that the workman was performing supervisory functions. reliance is placed on mathur aviation (supra) and cedric dsilva vs. union of india 2007 l.s.(bom) 725 to contend that pilot is a workman, his role is different from the captain of a ship. the contention of the management that in a .....

Pritam Singh Vs. King Airways

Court : Delhi

..... . further in the present case the three pilots/workmen were appointed as commanders whose duties have been defined in the operation manual which included the safety of the aircraft and its occupants during the flight, authority to take such measures as are necessary in this regard and the commander was responsible for order and discipline on board. ..... adjournments were sought by the management to file reply. the management proceeded ex-parte which order was vacated and then further amendments of the pleadings were sought. however, in a petition under section 33-c (2) id act no new right can be conferred on the workman. thus no interest can be awarded. in union of india vs. ..... even being an examiner does not show that the workman was performing supervisory functions. reliance is placed on mathur aviation (supra) and cedric dsilva vs. union of india 2007 l.s.(bom) 725 to contend that pilot is a workman, his role is different from the captain of a ship. the contention of the management that in a .....

King Airways Vs. CaptaIn Manjit Singh

Court : Delhi

..... . further in the present case the three pilots/workmen were appointed as commanders whose duties have been defined in the operation manual which included the safety of the aircraft and its occupants during the flight, authority to take such measures as are necessary in this regard and the commander was responsible for order and discipline on board. ..... adjournments were sought by the management to file reply. the management proceeded ex-parte which order was vacated and then further amendments of the pleadings were sought. however, in a petition under section 33-c (2) id act no new right can be conferred on the workman. thus no interest can be awarded. in union of india vs. ..... even being an examiner does not show that the workman was performing supervisory functions. reliance is placed on mathur aviation (supra) and cedric dsilva vs. union of india 2007 l.s.(bom) 725 to contend that pilot is a workman, his role is different from the captain of a ship. the contention of the management that in a .....

International Lease Finance Corporation vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... ilfc claimed a direction to the customs authorities for duty draw-back in terms of sections 71 and 74 of the customs act and argued that since the re- export (of the aircraft engine) after import and its utilization (towards safe return out of the country) and not for any other purpose, there was ..... refuse to refund them to the ilfc, which claims that its action in importing the aircraft engine and exporting it was out of compulsion, even necessity, to safeguard its interests as property owner. the revenue authorities acted unreasonably in detaining the engine; the cestat s order vindicated its stand.14. international airports ..... act. as such, we find no merit in the contention of the appellant on this ground 19. the original importer was kingfisher airlines; however due to its financial condition and other factors, ilfc, as owner, stepped in, flew the engine to help the aircraft which was grounded. therefore, it had to apply for permission to fly back the engine and seek suitable amendment .....

Harjit Kaur Dhingra Vs Pan American World Airways and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... arose on 22nd october, 1990 and the limitation would commence from the date the goods ought to have been delivered. the defendant no.2 also contended that while amending the plaint on impleading defendant no.2, certain changes were carried out by the plaintiff in the plaint which could not have been carried out without specific permission of ..... filed against pan american world airways, defendant no.1. later on defendant no.2 delta airways was impleaded as party to the suit pursuant to the application for amendment filed by the plaintiff which was allowed by order dated 2nd november, 1994. the defendant no.1 had already proceeded ex-parte and the court had allowed the ..... have to be considered. the carriage by air act, 1972 under rule 29 contemplates that right to damages shall be extinguished if an action is not brought within two years, reckoned from the date of arrival of goods at the destination, or from the date on which the aircraft ought to have arrived or from the date on which .....

King Airways Vs. Nd Kathuria

Court : Delhi

..... . further in the present case the three pilots/workmen were appointed as commanders whose duties have been defined in the operation manual which included the safety of the aircraft and its occupants during the flight, authority to take such measures as are necessary in this regard and the commander was responsible for order and discipline on board. ..... adjournments were sought by the management to file reply. the management proceeded ex-parte which order was vacated and then further amendments of the pleadings were sought. however, in a petition under section 33-c (2) id act no new right can be conferred on the workman. thus no interest can be awarded. in union of india vs. ..... even being an examiner does not show that the workman was performing supervisory functions. reliance is placed on mathur aviation (supra) and cedric dsilva vs. union of india 2007 l.s.(bom) 725 to contend that pilot is a workman, his role is different from the captain of a ship. the contention of the management that in a .....

Airmid Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs.orissa Stevedores Limited

Court : Delhi

..... the plaintiff cannot be in the nature of specific performance and can only be for recovery of damages. the claim of the defendant, of the plaintiff having taken back the aircraft, has implications qua limitation also. the suit has been instituted only on 1st december, 2018.7. whenever, from correspondence preceding the suit or otherwise, the defence of the ..... entertained.8. it cannot be forgotten that the suit has been filed as a commercial suit and the commercial courts, commercial division and commercial appellate division of high courts act. 2015 prescribes timelines for decision of the suits and suits cannot be decided within such time unless the controversy for adjudication emerges from the plaint so as to enable ..... suit to be specific about the claim being in limitation and pleadings cannot be left vague.13. the counsel for the plaintiff states that he will seek amendment.14. list on 16th january, 2019. rajiv sahai endlaw, j december12 2018 gsr .. cs(comm) 1283/2018 page 4 of 4

JaIn Shudh Vanaspati Limited Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1983(14)ELT1688(Del); ILR1983Delhi327

..... are imported, intocanada. raw sugar of the description imported by the party could be imported free under old schedule. but schedule 'a'to the tariff act was amended and a duty imposed. this amendment came into force on 3-5-1895. the ship sailed from antwerp with sugar consigned for montreal. on29-4-1895 the vessel put into the ..... for home consumption has been made by the proper officer.(56) chapter xi contains provisions with .regard to baggage carried by owners. stores imported in a vessel or aircraft and meant for use and consumption in the vessel or transfer to another vessel are exempt from payment of duty(sections 86 and 87).(57) chapter xiv contains ..... approved places only and not on holidays, and under supervision of custom officers vide sections 33, 34 and 36. the proper officer is further empowered to board the vessels,aircrafts. etc., and require production of documents and ask questions with regard to the goods so imported vide sections 37 and 38.(55) chapters vii, viii, ix and .....