Court : Delhi
..... is baseless and meaningless because the writ petitioner was represented through a defence assistant and it is unbelievable that the inquiry officer pressurized the petitioner to amend the letter requisitioning the documents. petitioner s presence is shown when defence witnesses were examined and for reasons unknown petitioner refused to sign the proceedings. ..... justice pradeep nandrajog hon'ble ms. justice pratibha rani pradeep nandrajog, j.1. the instant writ petition seeks quashing of the memorandum of charge dated november 28, 2007, issued by the directorate general, crpf to the petitioner as also the order dated september 13, 2012, passed by the digp (cr & vigilance), crpf ..... directions of commandant (ccd), thus endangering the life of his men and govt. property. thus, the said officer has failed to maintain absolute devotion to duty and acted in a manner unbecoming of a government servant and thereby violated the provisions contained in rule 3 (1) (ii) & (iii) of ccs (conduct) rules, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... adequately for the punishment both of principals and accessories.115. the heading of explosive substances act, 1908, states that it is an act further to amend the law relating to explosive substances. it is clear to us that explosive act and explosive substances act are pari materia enactments. they are statutes dealing with the same subject matter and form part ..... from provisions relating to sanction in several enactments including cr.p.c. earlier, consent of the central government was required but by way of amendment through act 54 of 2001 brought into force with effect from 1st february, 2002, district magistrate has been assigned the power to give consent. the said ..... made subject matter of challenge before the supreme court but the appeal was rejected in the decision reported as harbans singh vs. state (govt. of nct of delhi) (2007) 12 scc 535.in the said case, the following contention was raised and answered:- 12. she stated that she did not tell the accused persons that at this .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... action is disclosed, the courts will not unnecessarily protract the hearing of a suit. having regard to the changes in the legislative policy as adumbrated by the amendments carried out in the code of civil procedure, the courts would interpret the provisions in such a manner so as to save expenses, achieve expedition, avoid ..... purchased, and was in possession of, property no.c-486-b, gali no.20, bhajanpura, delhi (hereinafter the suit property ) through sale deed dated 8th february, 2007 for a sale consideration of `3,05,000/- from one smt. sosan masih. the appellant argued that thereafter, on account of financial constraints in 2009, the defendant, ..... to apply for regularization of allotments/leases by development authorities. we make it clear that if the documents relating to 'sa/gpa/will transactions' has been accepted acted upon by dda or other developmental authorities or by the municipal or revenue authorities to effect mutation, they need not be disturbed, merely on account of this .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... into force of the right to fair compensation and transparency in land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement act, 2013 ( the 2013 act hereafter) with effect from 01.01.2014, amendments to the petition were sought and granted; the fresh claim in the amended proceedings is for a declaration that the acquisition w.p.(c) 4289/2013 page 1 of ..... initial notification. dispensing with the hearing became the subject matter of writ proceedings that ultimately culminated in the order of the supreme court in civil appeal no.3813/2007 [ram dhari jindal v. uoi and ors.].. the petitioner had alleged that the supreme court s order dated 21.03.2012, no doubt, granted liberty to ..... lands to compensation, the benefit of the supreme court judgment had to be w.p.(c) 4289/2013 page 2 of 10 extended; more specifically in the amended proceedings, it is contended that the possession was never taken in accordance with law nor was compensation tendered to the original owners or the petitioner. therefore, the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... fails to comply with the requirements imposed on him under the act. provisions of section 21(1) of the act have to be read harmoniously with the provisions of section 15 of the act which reads as under: 15 power of controller to refuse or require amended applications, etc., in certain case where the controller is ..... ) ptc448(del.) in support of his contention that where an applicant pursues its application by responding to the objections, an order under section 21(1) of the act rejecting the application as abandoned, cannot be passed.8. the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the decisions in telefonaktiebolaget (supra) and ferid allani (supra) were ..... (hereinafter referred to as the act ).3. thereafter, the petitioner filed its request for examination on 15.12.2005. the first examination report (fer) was issued by the examiner of patents and design, respondent no.3, on 27.06.2007. several objections were raised in fer (18 in number). these objections were specifically .....
Tag this Judgment!