Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 12 amendment of section 11 Year: 2013 Page 9 of about 3,016 results (0.542 seconds)

Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited and ors. Vs. Harkesh Chan ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2013(2)MLJ77; AIR2013SCW347; AIR2013SC403; 2013(2)SCC29; 2013(1)SCJ973

..... the board, in exercise of power under section 79 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948, issued a notification on 14.3.1990 by bringing certain amendments in the recruitment and promotion for employees working in thermal power projects. the relevant part of the amendment reads as follows: -para 3(i) of part-a shall be substituted and ..... policy relating to acp scale granted under the acp scheme and the clarificatory communications are to be understood.12. coming back to the narration, recruitment and promotion policy as amended, the f.a. & c.a.o., ptps, hse, panipat, vide memo dated 7.12.1990 sought certain clarification in relation to grant of increments. the clarification ..... of apprentices and came to hold that the employer was bound to appoint the apprentices in the available vacancies because of section 22(2) of the 1961 act and the contractual obligations arising out of para 2 of the letter of appointment which stated that the apprentices shall be absorbed in the department if there are .....

Akhil Mansuklal Mehta Vs. Sheetal Deepak Karamchandani

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... there was no element of fraud or coercion involved when the terms of compromise were arrived between the parties and subsequently recorded. 11. by introducing the amendment to the c.p.c. (amendment) 1976 w.e.f. 1.2.1977, the legislature have brought into force rule 3-a to order 23, which creates bar to institute the ..... impugned judgment and order, it is crystal clear that the court has, in detail, considered the submissions of the parties and also adverted to the provisions of contract act, other relevant provisions and the judgments cited by the parties and rejected the application exh.17 filed by the petitioner. the findings recorded by the trial court are ..... parties have consented for the compromise by filing pursis. the compromise pursis were read and recorded by the court. it is further submitted that when the compromise terms are acted upon and admittedly the petitioner has received an amount of rs.1 crore and 45 lacs for the property bearing survey no. 51/2a, situated at shirdi, tq .....

Bank Mellat Vs. Her Majesty's Treasury

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... be followed in the high court or the court of appeal or in the court of session". 28. pursuant to sections 66 and 67 of the 2008 act, the civil procedure (amendment no 2) rules (si 2008/3085) were made by the lord chancellor on 2 december 2008, laid before parliament the next day, and came into force ..... part 79 of the civil procedure rules (which was designed to implement the rules which part 6 of the 2008 act, dealing with financial restrictions proceedings, contemplated) was inserted in the civil procedure rules by the civil procedure (amendment no 2) rules 2008/308517. as well as making detailed rules to fulfil the provisions of sections 66 and 67 ..... or replace many of the generally applicable provisions of the cpr in relation to proceedings under the 2008 act. most of these variations arise from the provision for a closed material procedure in some such proceedings. thus, the cpr are amended to take into account the potential need for (i) involvement of special advocates (in e.g. cpr .....

Madhavi Amma and ors. Vs. S. Prasannakumari and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... 1) to section 125 excludes such a bar of civil court jurisdiction in respect of proceedings pending in any court at the commencement of the kerala land reforms amendment act, 1969. even while creating such a bar of jurisdiction of civil courts, the law makers wanted to ensure that no person is allowed to abuse or misuse ..... -section has arisen, till such question is decided by the land tribunal, and any such injunction granted or appointment made before the commencement of the kerala land reforms (amendment) act, 1969, or before such question has arisen, shall stand cancelled.][(8) in this section, civil court shall include a rent control court as defined in the kerala ..... officer of the government:provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall apply to proceedings pending in any court at the commencement of the kerala land reforms amendment act, 1969.(2) no order of the land tribunal or the appellate authority or the land board or the taluk land board or the government or an .....

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Vs. Penugumatla Dhanalakshmi A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... learned chairman of the motor accidents claims tribunal-cum-ii additional district judge, east godavari at amalapuram (for short, 'tribunal') in m.v.o.p.no.195 of 2007 dated 07.10.2010, awarding compensation of rs.31,000/- (rupees thirty one thousand only), as against the claim of rs.1,00,000/-(rupees one lakh only), ..... of justice would be sub-served in giving such a direction to pay and recover having regard to the scope and purport of sections 149 read with 168 of the mv act,1988. xii) in another judgment of two judges bench in national insurance company limited vs. parvathneni & another26, the apex court doubted the correctness of the directions ..... the aforementioned cases, which were referred to by the supreme court, directions were given on the facts of each case and considered the fact that the provisions of the act dealing with insurance and payment of compensation are beneficial in nature".. xvii) in paragraph 81 of swaran singh (supra), it was observed that right to avoid liability .....

Ajantha Pharma Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... applicant, the respondent has failed to disclose to the controller the information required by section 8 of the act, in particular, the european counterpart of the subject patent which was refused vide decision dated 11.12.2007. this is marked as exhibit e. according to the applicant, the respondent had not tendered the following ..... applicant and mr. praveen anand for the respondent argued at length their respective cases and also filed their written submissions. 34. the respondent has proposed to amend the claims and restrict themselves to two specific claims. the claims are as follows:- (1) twice a day daily dosage ophthalmic pharmaceutical composition for the ..... combination and properly falling within the scope of the original wider combination to discord or eliminates from the invention claimed everything except this sub combination the amendment would come within the meaning of disclaimer. it was submitted that the use of the expression about would not render the claim vague. for .....

United States Vs. Windsor

Court : US Supreme Court

..... w. 2d 862 (iowa 2009); vt. stat. ann., tit. 15, 8 (2010); n. h. rev. stat. ann. 457:1 a (west supp. 2012); religious freedom and civil marriage equality amendment act of 2009, 57 d. c. reg. 27 (dec. 18, 2009); n. y. dom. rel. law ann. 10 a (west supp. 2013); wash. rev. code 26.04.010 (2012); ..... that must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest, parents involved in community schools v. seattle school dist. no. 1, 551 u. s. 701, 720 (2007) (internal quotation marks omitted) are those that are so seldom relevant to the achievement of any legitimate state interest that laws grounded in such considerations are deemed to reflect prejudice ..... to pay such a tax causes a real and immediate economic injury to the individual taxpayer. hein v. freedom from religion foundation, inc., 551 u. s. 587, 599 (2007) (plurality opinion) (emphasis deleted). windsor suffered a redressable injury when she was required to pay estate taxes from which, in her view, she was exempt but for the .....

“on 23.12.2009 Written Statements and Oral Arguments of the Vs. Gurb ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... demolished watercours.in question is a sanctioned watercourse. 2. that vide order dated 31.10.1995 passed under section 20 of northern india canal and drainage act 8 of 1873 and punjab amendment act 23 of 1965, true translated copy of which is annexed herewith as annexure r-1, the divisional canal officer, harike division, canal colony, ferozepur, ..... respondent, irrigation and more production undersigned finds concurrence with the request of respondent. the appeal is dismissed u/s30f of the northern india canal and drainage act 8 of 1873. punjab amendment 23 of 1965. meaning thereby decision of divisional canal officer, canal division, ferozepur dated 25.1.2010 is upheld. . it is apparent from ..... in question is also clearly shown in the map of warabandi duly sanctioned by the learned deputy collector, eastern canal division, ferozepur vide order dated 14.3.2007, copy of which is also annexed herewith as annexure r-4 for kind perusal of this hon'ble court, which further goes to show that the .....

Sree Seetharama Chandra Swamy Vari Deva Vs. Government OfA.P., Rep. by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... dated 11.05.2012 passed in p.l.c.no.apslsa/pla/7683/2008 by the pension lok adalat constituted under legal services authorities act, 1987 & amendment act, 1994 in sofar as it directed release of consequential monetary benefits such as pay & allowances, increments to the 3rd respondent from the ..... of the 3rd respondent. questioning the said memo, the 3rd respondent filed w.p.no.27903 of 2007 before this court. while admitting the writ petition, an interim order on 21.01.2008 in w.p.m.p.no.36495 of ..... 2007 directing the devasthanam to continue the 3rd respondent herein as 'archaka', was passed. pursuant to the said orders of this ..... dated 11.05.2012 passed in p.l.c.no.apslsa/pla/7683/2008 by the pension lok adalat constituted under legal services authorities act, 1987 & amendment act, 1994 in so far as it directed the release of consequential monetary benefits such as pay & allowances, increments to the 3rd .....

Shrigonda Taluka Sakhar Kamgar Union and Others Vs. the State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... no. iii of 2006, published on 17-2-2006, as unconstitutional. petition has been filed on 11-4-2012 and amended on 4-5-2012 to incorporate challenge to maharashtra act no. i of 2012. 3. writ petition no. 2828 of 2007 is filed by very same trade unions and challenge therein is to ordinance no.1 of 2006 and consequential maharashtra ..... act no. viii of 2006. this petition filed on 22-9-2006, has not been amended thereafter. 4. this court has on ..... 4th october 2012, passed orders on civil application no. 6951 of 2012 (in writ petition no. 3694 of 2012) and on civil application no. 7015 of 2012 (in writ petition no. 2828 of 2007). the division .....