Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 12 amendment of section 11 Court: mumbai nagpur Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 22 results (0.135 seconds)

Jul 25 2013 (HC)

Dental College and Hospital of the Vidarbha Youth Welfare Society and ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jul-25-2013

..... teaching faculty as per norms laid down by the council and the final batch of students take the final year examinations. the relevant provisions of dentists (amendment) act, 1993, relevant regulations and events 8. the petitioner, pursuant to the due permission from the competent authority, started under graduation course of bachelor of ..... . bank ltd., branch jaistambh chowk, amravati, maharashtra, and to convey the formal permission of the central government under section 10a (4) of the dentists (amendment) act, 1993 to vidarbha youth welfare society's dental college and hospital, amravati, maharashtra, for starting of mds course in the specialities of (i) picsthodontics and ..... renewal permission from the central government. 3. admissions made in violation of the above stipulations will attract the provisions of section 10b of the dentists (amendment) act, 1993. as a result, second batch also got admitted and the students started prosecuting their studies in m.d.s. course. 10. the dci .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2013 (HC)

The State of Maharashtra, Through the Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Feb-22-2013

..... words for use or sale therein are substituted by words for use, consumption, or as the case may be, sale therein by the amendment of 25.04.2012. 8. considering the provisions of the act, we find considerable merit in the submission of the learned additional gp mrs. bharti dangre that the chassis was bought at raipur and effected ..... by the deputy commissioner of sales tax dated 30.05.2005 and the order passed by the assessment officer i.e. entry trax officer, nagpur dated 15.02.2007 are set aside. the tribunal further directed that the amount which was already deposited by respondent no.1 (appellant before the tribunal) to the tune of rs.53 ..... the tribunal, in its order of remand, quashed the orders of the lower authorities namely assessment officer and the first appellate authority. the assessment officer, on 15.02.2007, on considering the matter afresh, passed the order of assessment on the purchase value of chassis only. this order was challenged by respondent no.1 in appeal before deputy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 10 2013 (HC)

Vidarbha Ayurved Mahavidyalaya and Others Vs. Tuleshwar Mangalmurti Dh ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jun-10-2013

..... institutions of higher learning, research and specialized studies, hostels and provide housing for staff, on the recommendation of the academic council. next clause permits it to make, amend or repeal ordinances and prepare draft statutes and make recommendation thereon to senate. its clause "d" empowers it to hold, control and arrange for administration of assets ..... state government dated 27.06.2001 to be contempt of court. 12. contempt petition was then filed in high court vide contempt petition no. 233 of 2007 and that contempt petition was then disposed of on 04.05.2009. the cause of action, therefore, accrued in favour of the employees on 27.06. ..... the respondent tried to contend that certain proceedings have been initiated for impugning the recognition granted to the appellant school under the u.p. basic education act and as such the appellant's status as a recognized institution cannot be taken for granted. we cannot countenance this argument because any proceedings instituted to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2013 (HC)

Ku. Renu D/O Murlidhar Makde Vs. Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj, Nagpur U ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Apr-09-2013

..... the result of 7th semester examination. 8. the controversy, therefore, needs to be viewed in the background of provisions contained in ordinance no.27 of 2008 as amended by ordinance no.6 of 2010. similar provisions are considered by this court in the case of ku.nikita vs. rashtrasant tukdoji maharaj nagpur university, nagpur and ..... examinations completely, she could not have been given provisional admission to 4th year i.e. 7th and 8th semesters. they relied upon very same ordinance as amended vide ordinance no.6 of 2010. it is sufficient to reproduce paragraph nos.4 and 5 of their submissions, filed before this court, to note this defence ..... provisional admission of the students subject to result of reassessment. the same is issued by the board of examinations under section 31(2) of the maharashtra universities act, 1994. clause no.10 therein, stipulates that facility of provisional admission is restricted to candidate who has failed in one examination and has applied for reassessment. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2013 (HC)

State of Maharashtra, Through Deputy Commissioner of Police Vs. Shashi ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jul-02-2013

..... herein. since during the pendency of the present application, first information report came to be registered by police station, dhantoli nagpur, the application has been amended so as to raise the challenge to the registration of the said first information report. consequently, the state has also prayed for quashing and setting aside ..... examine what is the case sought to be made out against the four persons who, according to the complainant, have committed the offence punishable under the atrocities act. i) the allegations against shri kailash bilonikar, under secretary (pol1), home department, mantralaya, mumbai. the allegation against shri bilonikar are that he is a ..... with the state is purely a dispute pertaining to service matter. however, the complainant has attempted to bring it under the provisions of the atrocities act, taking advantage of the fact that the complainant belongs to scheduled caste. as already discussed hereinabove, we find that the complaint addressed to the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2013 (HC)

Chandrashekhar S/O Manohar Tanksale Vs. Pandharinath S/O Vithobaji New ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Aug-20-2013

..... notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1) as in force before the commencement of the maharashtra slum areas (improvement, clearance and redevelopment) (amendment) act, 1986 (hereinafter in this section referred to as "the amendment act") or in any other law for the time being in force, no person shall, except with the previous permission in writing of the ..... date of the expiry of the maharashtra vacant lands (further interim protection to occupiers from eviction and recovery of arrears of rent act, 1980) and the date of commencement of the amendment act, for eviction of an occupier from any building or land in a slum area (which area was earlier purported to be covered ..... dispute that the said decree has been affirmed up to the apex court. after the decree was passed, the execution proceedings vide special darkhast no.2/2007 came to be filed by the appellant before the additional small causes court, nagpur. in the said proceedings, on 20th january, 2010 an application vide exh .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2013 (HC)

Agricultural Produce Market Committee Vs. the Hon'ble Member, Industri ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jan-30-2013

..... of industrial or other establishments in section 2(ii) is very significant. prior to 1982, said section only employed words industrial establishment and proceeded to define it. in 1982, the amendment act 38/1982 added words or other and since then said section defines industrial or other establishments . he further submits that though these words are added to main definition in its ..... background is also called for. 23. in the judgment commissioner of income tax, kerala .v. tara agencies (reported in 2007(6) scc 429), phrases manufacture, production, processing are construed in the light of provisions of section 35b of the income tax act. the respondent-assessee had claimed entitlement to weighted deduction being a small scale exporter and it was disallowed by income .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2013 (HC)

Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik Vs. Kalicharan and O ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Apr-09-2013

..... the directions in the judgment of the supreme court would not automatically come into force and would require the state government to carry out necessary amendments in the act and the university to amend statute, ordinance or rules framed thereunder. therefore, according to them, the government resolution dated 18/8/2004, even if taken to have ..... of ayurved or his representative would be essential. as already observed, there is no dispute that in the meeting of the selection committee held on 7/7/2007, though representative of director of ayurved was nominated and also invited, he did not actually remain present. the learned senior counsel for the appellant submitted that ..... were rather perverse and unsustainable. the learned judge also held that the selection of the respondent no.1 in the meeting of selection committee dated 7/7/2007 was not vitiated in spite of absence of director of ayurved or his nominee as member secretary of the selection committee. as already stated, aggrieved thereby, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2013 (HC)

National Seed Association of India and Others Vs. the State of Maharas ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Aug-13-2013

..... colour and content of the label as may be specified.12th july, 2007 :the essential commodities (amendment) act, 2006 was notified whereby 'cotton seed' was deleted from the act, 1955. by the amendment, section 2-a was introduced in the essential commodities act whereby the central government retained the power to add/ remove any commodity ..... consequently no sale of such seeds are regulated under section 7 of the seeds act, 1966; and whereas cotton seed is not an essential commodity within the meaning of the essential commodities act, 1955 as amended by the essential commodities (amendment) act, 2006; and whereas the provisions of the seeds (control) order, 1983 issued ..... under section 3 of the essential commodities act, 1955 are not applicable in so far as they relate to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2013 (HC)

Rahul Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Its Minister, Animal Husbandary ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : May-07-2013

..... respondent no.2 by an order dated 12.2.1999. the respondent nos.6 to 15, had in the meanwhile filed a revision under section 154 of the act challenging the amendment to the bye-laws of the society. the revision was dismissed by the state government. after the dismissal of the revision, the respondent nos.6 to 15 ..... by the respondent nos.6 to 15 and remanded the matter to the joint registrar, co-operative societies for a fresh decision on the propriety of the amendment of the bye-laws of the society. the same question could not have been agitated before the state govt. by filing a second revision under section 154 of ..... carried out after seeking the approval of the assistant registrar of the co-operative societies. the respondent nos.6 to 15 were aggrieved by the order granting permission to amend the bye-laws and hence challenged the same before the divisional deputy registrar, cooperative societies, nagpur. the divisional deputy registrar rejected the appeal filed by the respondent nos .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //