Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 12 amendment of section 11 Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Year: 2006 Page 2 of about 204 results (0.219 seconds)

Bpl Ltd. Vs. Deputy Cgt

Court : Karnataka

..... is a case in which the. court was considering the valuation aspect of the matter. facts in that case would show that it was prior to amendment of the act in terms of the wealth tax act.cwt v. purshottam n. amersay & anr. : [1969]71itr180(bom) , purshottam n amarsay & anr. v. cwt : [1973]88itr417(sc) and ahmed g.h. ariff & ..... ors. v. ranchi club ltd. : [2001]247itr209(sc) , the levy of interest was justified especially when section 16b of the act was in pari materia with section 234b of the income tax act prior to its amendment vide finance act, 2001 ?5. matter is heard on several dates. sri arvind datar, learned senior counsel, would argue that there was no gift ..... ors. v. cwt : [1970]76itr471(sc) are the decisions no doubt referable to valuation. but all these decisions are rendered prior to amendment. in the case on hand, .....

Gabriel Bhaskarappa Kuri, Vs. the United Basel Mission Church in India ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(3)KarLJ205; ILR2007(1)Kar773; 2007(1)KCCR758; 2007(2)AIRKarR213; AIR2007NOC945; 2007(3)CivilLJ669

..... a later stage in the suit itself is very much restricted, in appeal it cannot be allowed as a matter of course even though these provisions are not amended by the said amendment act. unless the party makes out a case as contemplated under order 41 rule 27 cpc the court cannot admit documents. while exercising such power, the court shall ..... conferred upon the court by the code ought to be very sparingly exercised. while exercising such power it is necessary for the appellate courts to keep in mind the amendment to the code of civil procedure brought about in the year 2002. now, even in the trial court the parties have to produce the documents on which they rely ..... of the parties before the court possibly without seeking any extension of time.(v) the parties are directed to be present before the first appellate court on 8.1.2007.(vi) both the parties shall cooperate with the court in disposing of the appeal within the period stipulated.high court registry is directed to send a copy of this .....

Shriram Properties Ltd. Rep. by Its Authorised Signatory Sri. V. Sridh ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2007)208CTR(Kar)141; [2007]8STJ415(Karnataka); 2007[7]STR3; [2007]7STT131; (2007)5VST228(Karn)

..... notification no. 18/2005-st; that the principle of promissory estoppel cannot be invoked in matters of taxation particularly issue of exemption notification under section 93 of the act being in the nature of exercise of the power of delegated legislation; that the writ petition is without merit and is liable to be dismissed.6. what is ..... imposing the condition subject to which the concession under the notification can be availed of is well within the powers of the central government under section 93 of the act; that though the earlier notification no. 18/2005-st did provide a larger benefit to persons like the petitioner, it has been superseded by the present notification no ..... assessee liable to tax under the provisions of the finance act 32 of 1994 [for short 'the act'] as amended from time to time and the activity which is subjected to tax in so far as petitioner is concerned is construction of complexes in terms of the charging section of the act i.e., 5% of the value of services is .....

Raj and Raj Investments Represented by Its Partner Sri S. Paniraj Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2007)213CTR(Kar)206; [2007]293ITR57(KAR); [2007]293ITR57(Karn)

..... earlier, did not contain any power of impounding of documents during the course of search of a premises. the power for impounding documents is a later addition by amending act 20/2002 with effect from 1.6.2002, to which my specific attention has been drawn by sri. aravind, learned counsel for the respondents.the provision reads ..... of the document though technically might have been authorised by the chief commissioner of income tax by approving the proposal for their continued retention up to 31.12.2007 is not forthcoming in the statement of objections filed on behalf of the respondents.12. the entire action of conducting the survey is in the context of ..... and other stamped documents; that such impounding is not permitted under the provisions of section 133a(4) of the act; that the communication dated 4th august 2006 indicating that the retention is authorised up to 31.12.2007 by the chief commissioner of income tax, bangalore-iii is not permitted in law; that such authorisation, if any .....

Shanthaveerappa S/O Adigerahalli Ramanna Vs. K.N. Janardhanachari S/O ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR1127; 2007(6)KarLJ531

..... continuation of the original proceedings. in effect the entire proceedings are before the appellate court and it has power to re-appreciate the evidence. it has the power to amend the pleadings, frame issues, resettle issues, delete issues, receive evidence by way of additional evidence, record evidence, summon witnesses and documents, order for commission, pass interim ..... , the lower appellate court was not justified in remanding the case for fresh enquiry. when additional evidence is tendered in appeal, the lower appellate court should have acted under order 41 rules 27 to 29 cpc and not remand the whole case under order 41 rule 23a. in the light of the aforesaid settled legal position, ..... it is necessary in the interests of justice to remit the suit, remand should be resorted to. when additional evidence is tendered in appeal, the court should act under rule 28 and not remand the whole case under this rule. such an order can be passed only in exceptional cases as, for example, where there .....

Jodharam, S/O Ranaji Ramji Vs. Smt. Jagnmathamma, W/O Late S. Sharanab ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR379; 2007(2)KLJ216; 2007(1)KCCR614; 2007(1)AIRKarR663; AIR2007NOC718; 2007(3)CivilLJ140

..... for possession of the suit schedule premises.the defendant entered appearance and filed written statement on 31.8.1999. the defendant has got his written statement amended twice and filed amended written statement on 3.1.2001 and 4.7.2002. the defendant has admitted rate of rent and tenancy. the contention of the defendant is that ..... the entire property as any sole owner of the property is'. the ratio laid down is applicable on all the fours to a suit for possession under transfer of property act. the allahabad high court in the decision reported in : air1988all305 (girraj kishore v. dr. trilokinath vimal), followed the decision reported in : [1977]3scr412 , supra, and ..... held that one of the co-owners is competent to serve notice terminating tenancy and competent to maintain a suit under section 106 of the transfer of property act hence, the second contention of the appellant also falls to the ground.10. i see no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment. the decisions cited by .....

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited a Company Incorporate ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(2)KLJ235; 2007(1)KCCRSN16; 2007(1)AIRKarR402

..... considered along with the applicants who filed application in pursuance of the notification. this first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 11 of the act was introduced by way of amendment act, 1999 w.e.f. 18.12.1999.23. therefore, the question for consideration is whether this proviso is prospective and it would take away the ..... by substituting words 'reserved by the state government' in place of 'reserved by government'. this is because on the very day mmrd act 1957 was amended by act 36/86 and introduced section 17a in the act with effect from 10-2-87. under the said sec, state government is empowered to reserve any area with the consent of central ..... placed. all these petitioners would constitute a class by themselves. all these applications of the petitioners are made prior to the amendment, introducing the first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 11 of the act, as the amendment came into force from 18.12.1999. therefore, on the day they made these applications, the law as it stood .....

St. Ann's D.E.D. College rep. by Its Principal Sri Venkatachalapahi an ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR419; 2007(2)KarLJ121

..... in sslc or its equivalent examination or the candidate must have studied that language as first language in sslc or its equivalent examination. this rule is subsequently amended by an amendment dated 2012.2004 by which the requirement is relaxed by adding the word 'or as second language' immediately after the words 'first language' as found ..... in the first petitioner -institution. they have been admitted under the management quota for the academic year 2005-2006 (wrongly stated in the petition as 2006-2007). the intake fixed for the first petitioner -institution for admission is 50 seats out of which 25 seats are management quota seats and the remaining 25 seats ..... medium?7. the state government in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section 1 of section 14 of the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fee) act. 1984 has framed the rules known as the karnataka selection of candidates for admission to diploma in education course (d.ed.) rules, 2002. rule 3 of .....

Nalini Kumari, Major Vs. K.S. Bopaiah, Major

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(1)KarLJ342

..... of the words 'as to the nature of the ceremony or as to any material fact concerning the respondent'. thus, after the amendment of clause (c) of section 12(1) of the act by marriage laws (amendment) act, 1976, the emphasis cannot be laid only regarding the nature of the ceremony or factum of marriage, but, in case there is ..... respondent and her parents had enabled the petitioner to claim, that, his marriage with the respondent be annulled under the provisions of section 12 of the hindu marriage act, 1955, ('act' for short) owing to the presence of fraud factor. it is also stated, that in the presence of fraud, the arrangement that had been made in inducing ..... deception as to any material fact or circumstances concerning the respondent, the said case would also be covered by sub-clause (c) of section 12(1) of the act.17. now .....

M. Pakkeerappa Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR23; 2007(1)KarLJ681; 2007(1)KCCR270; 2007(3)AIRKarR96(DB)

..... the approval was granted to the said appointment by the director of pre-university education as per annexure-'l' order dated 3.6.2003. thereupon the petitioner amended the writ petition to include a prayer for quashing annexure-'l' order. the 4th respondent filed statement of objection justifying their action in appointing the 5th respondent ..... parties under article 226 of the constitution of india. the learned single judge also held that alternate remedy is available to the petitioner under the karnataka education act, 1983. the learned single judge further observed that no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the ..... rejected:2) if the appellant wishes to file any appeal against annexure-'l' order before the first respondent-government of karnataka under section 130 of karnataka education act, 1983, he shall file the appeal within a period of one month from today. if he does not file the appeal within the said period of one .....