Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 12 amendment of section 11 Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 204 results (0.331 seconds)

Dec 22 2006 (HC)

B.R. Vasudevamurthy S/O. H.D. Ramaswamy and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Hon

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-22-2006

Reported in : ILR2007(1)KAR1034; 2007(2)KCCRSN97; 2007(3)AIRKarR71(DB)

..... the applicants are permitted to come on record, as they are proper and necessary parties to these proceedings. the learned counsel appearing for them are directed to amend the cause title of the writ petition forthwith.3. the impugned orders questioned in these petitions are one and the same. the parties are same and the ..... of the sites formed by the kendra upadyayara sangha (hereinafter in short called as 'sangha') which is a registered society under the provisions of karnataka societies registration act, 1960 and rules formed thereunder. lands bearing sy. nos. 45 and 47 of jakkasandra village, bangalore south taluk was granted in favour of the sangha by the ..... lay the learned counsel on behalf of the inamdars would with all fours supports the case of the contesting respondents. the supreme court has held that the act of the parties cannot extinguish their lawful and statutory rights upon the lands in question conferred under the provisions of the statutory enactment. in this context, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2006 (HC)

The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Assessment) Special Range-6 Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-22-2006

Reported in : (2007)209CTR(Kar)62; [2007]293ITR451(KAR); [2007]293ITR451(Karn)

..... rs. 3,90,530/- the turnover of the previous assessment year. the tribunal had considered the three condition* specified in section 40a(2)(a) of the act while confirming the order of the assistant commissioner regarding the excessiveness or unreasonableness of the remuneration and commission alleged to have been paid by the assessee to his brothers ..... in : [1970]78itr268(sc) . in the said case, the supreme court has ruled that in an enquiry, under section 10(4a) of the income tax act, 1922, into the excessiveness or unreasonableness of an allowance resulting in the provision of any remuneration or benefit or amenity to a director or a person who has ..... the respondent-assessee' a case, in relation to the assessment year 1991-92, 1992-93, the commissioner took up revisional proceedings under section 263 of the act on the ground that the assessments made by the assessing authority were erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue, in that, the assessing authority had erroneously .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2006 (HC)

Smt. M.C. Nagalakshmi and ors. Vs. Sri. M.A. Farook and Sri. M.A. Yaku ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-22-2006

..... are not entitled for the decree for specific performance, as it would fall under section 20 of the specific relief act. he further submitted that by application dated 27.3.2006 in i.a. iv, defendants have sought for an amendment, of the written statement under order vi rule 17 read with section 151 of cpc interalia for insertion of ..... and injury and submitted that the court should exercise its discretion in favour of defendants by refusing to grant the decree for specific performance. he also submitted that the amendment application be allowed to plead the repudiation of the contract by defendant no. 8. he also submitted that defendants have filed another application under order xli rule 27 cpc ..... to the proceedings by virtue of an order dated 23.2.2000, the said order binds defendant no. 9. he also submitted that it is not universal law that amendment would go back to the date of application. in this regard, he relied on a judgment reported in air 2002 sc 3369 head note-c. in support of his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2006 (HC)

Rajashree Cement, a Unit of Grasim Industries Limited, by Its Deputy G ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-22-2006

Reported in : 2009(2)KarLJ400

..... levy electricity tax in terms of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the amending act. the amending act no. 5 of 2004 is well within the competence of the state legislature and the parent act as amended by this amending act is one valid and enforceable.44. the amending act has been given effect to from 16-10-2003 itself. this no doubt leaves an ..... corporation ltd. : [2002]3scr278 , decisions of this court in state of karnataka v. hbll and ors. : ilr2005kar1397 , wst coast paper molls ltd v. union of india : 2007(212)elt305(kar) and also the decision of the supreme court in the case of kerala hotel & restaurant association v. state of kerala : [1990]1scr516 .28. it is the submission ..... wp no. 51265 of 2003] pramod v. kathavi [appearing for the petitioners in wp no. 50822 of 2003, wp no. 42632 of 2004 and wp no. 37421 of 2007], sri sriranga [appearing for petitioner in wp no. 50935 of 2003], sri somashekar [appearing for petitioners in wp nos. 48766, 49622 and 52230 of 2003, 3174, 8985, 10611 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2006 (HC)

Sri C. Shiva S/O Chikka Chowdappa Vs. the State of Karnataka, Represen ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-22-2006

Reported in : 2007(3)KarLJ148

..... effects or through samples taken from parents, siblings etc.the proforma through which the details of the missing person's identity are presently being collected needs to be amended in this regard. such an effort will facilitate the comparison and establishment of identity and help narrow the scope of search and establish the identity of the missing ..... in terms of the suggestions/ materials in the order, so that the city of bangalore is rid of missing complaints and we do hope that the government would act swiftly in maintaining a safer name for safer investment and for safer living in the state of karnataka.20. we also place on record our appreciation for the ..... figures are shocking to us. in terms of the affidavit of the commissioner, every month 400 persona are missing in bangalore alone. this would show that the criminal acts are increasing and citizens are not safe in the city of bangalore.8. after noticing the large number of missing persons in bangalore, alone we thought that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2006 (HC)

Umakanth Mallikarjunaswamy and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-19-2006

Reported in : ILR2007(1)Kar573; 2007(2)KarLJ172; 2007(2)KCCR1239; 2007(2)AIRKarR92

..... said committee, after thorough study submitted its interim report to the state, suggesting various measures. as the state government felt that it may consume considerable time to amend the relevant enactment for implementation of the recommendations of the committee, the state government, at the first instance issued an order dated 28.4.2001 for formation of ..... the model bye-laws to the gram panchayaths and consequently, the panchayats have not adopted the model bye-laws as contemplated under section 316 of the 'kpr act; that the terms of the existing committees shall be allowed to continue till completion of their terms of three years, in order to develop and maintain the ..... thus, the lacunae found in the earlier government order dated 28.4.2001 are rectified to the substantial extent. the provisions of section 316 of the 'kpr act' empowers the state government to make model bye-laws for the gram panchayats after previous publication of the draft for not less than one month. in these matters .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2006 (HC)

Rathnakar Rao Sindhe Vs. Smt. Leela Ashwath

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-19-2006

Reported in : ILR2007(1)Kar587; 2007(2)KLJ285; 2007(1)KCCR746; 2007(2)AIRKarR143; AIR2007NOC941

..... take out his share from the dwelling house, a female heir cannot claim partition against him. but section 23 of the act had been omitted during the pendency of the suit. it came to be omitted by the hindu succession (amendment) act, 2005 (no. 39/2005) with effect from 9.9.2005, hence, the restriction put on the right of a female heir ..... money than her share was not proved by any satisfactory evidence.4. the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that section 23 of the hindu succession act, 1956 ('the act' for short) was in force as on the date of filing of the suit and hence, the trial court has erred in law in decreeing the suit in so ..... , question of enforcing the said restriction after it ceased to be in force does not arise at all. in my opinion, the effect of omission of section 23 of the act would apply to all proceedings whether original or appellate involving adjudication of the rights of the parties and pending as on 9.9.2005 or initiated after that date.6 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2006 (HC)

Canara Precision Instruments by Prop. Mrs. Lalitha M. Achar, Vs. Union ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-18-2006

Reported in : AIR2007Kant100; III(2007)BC203; [2007]137CompCas306(Kar); ILR2007KAR410

..... has to be treated as an application for the purpose as per sub clause (1) of section 30 of the amended act accordingly, it was submitted that when there being such a provision to enable to carry out the purpose of the act, the central government may make such rules in furtherance of the same by virtue of section 30(1) and a ..... which the fee he has to pay is only rs. 250/- and not the amount as claimed i.e, rs. 30,000/-. it is further contended, the amendment to section 30 of the act makes it clear that what is sought to be challenged by the petitioners is in the form of an appeal to the tribunal as against the order of ..... imposing fees for dealing with such matters in modification of the earlier amount fixed and not in disregard of the provisions of the act rather it is contemporaneous and in conformity with the provisions of the act and that the amended provision imposing fees to be paid by way of court fee is neither arbitrary nor ultravires the legislation.9. in the light .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2006 (HC)

The Commissioner of Income-tax and the Deputy Commissioner of Income-t ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-15-2006

Reported in : (2007)207CTR(Kar)620; [2007]293ITR146(KAR); [2007]293ITR146(Karn)

..... within the meaning of the expression 'perquisite' the amount treated as perquisite under section 17(2)(vi) which also was introduced by the same taxation laws (amendment) act, 1984. in other words, a loan granted to an employee who is a director or who has a substantial interest in the company without charging any interest ..... benefit for the purposes of section 17(2)(iii) of the act, there was no need for parliament to introduce, by the taxation laws (amendment) act, 1984, the new sub-clause (vi) in section 17(2) of the act. the subsequent omission of the said sub-clause by the finance act of 1985 with effect from the date of its proposed insertion ..... at a concessional rate of interest did not amount to a benefit or amenity falling within clause (b)(iii) of explanation 2 to section 40a(5) of the act. the amendment and the immediate deletion thereof manifest clearly the intention of parliament.it is, therefore, evident that, without a specific provision which was sought to be introduced by sub .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 2006 (HC)

Bpl Limited Rep. by Its General Manager Corporate Taxation and Audit S ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-15-2006

Reported in : (2007)208CTR(Kar)346; [2007]293ITR321(KAR); [2007]293ITR321(Karn)

..... is a case in which the court was considering the valuation aspect of the matter. facts in that case would show that it was prior to amendment of the act in terms of the wealth tax act.71 itr 180; 88 itr 417 and 76 itr 471 are the decisions no doubt referable to valuation. but all these decisions are rendered prior to ..... and ors. v. ranchi club limited : [2001]247itr209(sc) , the levy of interest was justified especially when section 16b of the act was in pari material with section 234b of the income-tax act prior to its amendment vide finance act, 20015. matter is heard on several dates. sri aravind datar, learned senior counsel would argue that there was no gift at all ..... amendment. in the case on hand, method of valuation is provided in the statute itself. therefore, what we require to see is as to whether valuation is in terms .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //