Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: aircraft amendment act 2007 section 12 amendment of section 11 Court: karnataka Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 73 results (0.250 seconds)

Mahila Jagran Manch, Bangalore Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(4)KarLJ295

..... prescribing any objective norms. that makes it difficult for us to substitute our own judgment for that of the government on the question whether section 3 of the amendment act should be brought into force. this is particularly so when the failure of the central government to bring that section into force so far can be no ..... force because it was found difficult to appreciate what practical difficulty could prevent the government from bringing into force the provisions of section 3 introduced by 44th amendment. it was held that the remedywas not the writ of mandamus. it was further held 'the court's power of judicial review in such cases has ..... negatively by inhibiting it from acting. it further held that no such direction can be issued because, 'if the parliament had laid down an objective standard or test governing the decision of the central government in the matter of enforcement of the amendment, it may have been possible to assess the situation judicially by examining the causes .....

N.H. Anjanappa and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR576

..... learned counsel for the 4th respondent contended that the society is a registered house building co-operative society under the provisions of the karnataka co-operative societies act; that a three man committee constituted by the government considered the representation of the 4th respondent society and thereafter approval was accorded by the government for ..... individual persons such as sri s. rangarajan a capitalist, trading in the sale of sites. the whole purpose is opposed to the scheme of the act.it is submitted that the deputy commissioner has not considered the objections filed by the petitioners in its report submitted to the government and therefore there ..... c.b. srinivasan, learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the 4th respondent - society is a company as defined under section 3(e)(vi) of the act; therefore the person who is appointed to perform the functions of the deputy commissioner ought to have followed the provisions of the karnataka land acquisition (companies) .....

Manohar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1997CriLJ398; ILR1996KAR3419; 1996(7)KarLJ503

..... rigorous imprisonment. the learned sessions judge has found accepting the radiological expert's evidence that the appellant was 20. we think under section 10(a) of the borstal act the state government may favourably consider detaining him in a borstal school. somasundaram, j. i agree with the conclusions arrived at by my learned brother regarding the ..... my learned brother does not think that the time is quite ripe for such a reform and still shares the apprehensions of the legislature, which enacted the evidence act of 1872. with the highest regard for his opinion, i would like to take this opportunity of expressing a different view in this case although we are in ..... anomalous and practical difficulties and grave injustice, which may be done to an accused person himself by the operation of sections 25, 26 and 27 of the evidence act enacted, though they were in 1872, on distrust of the then existing police, and an apprehension that they may misuse extensive powers if confessions made to them .....

The Asst. Commr. and Lao Vs. Kappe Erappa and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR440; 1997(1)KarLJ128

..... mentioned in section 23(1-a), in effect it amounts to giving retrospective effect to sub-section (1-a) to section 23 under the amendment act 68 of 1984, even though the amendment act was prospective and the transitory provision had only retro-limited activity.4. therefore, we hold that the claimants would be entitled to additional amount of ..... annum from the date of publication of the notification under section 4(1) till the date of the award, since possession had already been taken before the amending act has come into force.'9. in view of these two decisions of their lordships of the supreme court, it appears that the taw laid down by the ..... , the possession of which has been taken by the deputy commissioner (land acquisition officer) prior to preliminary notification under section 4(1) of the land acquisition act published in the gazette respecting such lands.'the learned government pleader placed much reliance on this decision in support of his contention that as possession of the land .....

Siddeshwar and Co. Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation

Court : Karnataka

..... under this section as if the certificate or the copy thereof had been the certificate sent to him by the authorised officer. 45-e. validity of certificate and amendment thereof. - (1) when the authorised officer issues a certificate to a recovery officer under section 45-c, it shall not be open to the factory or ..... any orders withdrawing or cancelling a certificate or any correction made by him under sub-section (2) or any amendment made under sub-section (4) of section 45-f.' section 73-d of the employees' state insurance act further provides that the employer's special contribution payable under chapter v-a is also recoverable as if it ..... counsel for the appellant to the effect that the recovery proceedings could not be taken without following the provisions of section 45-a of the employees' state insurance act. learned counsel for the respondents smt. geethadevi iyappa submitted that no such circumstances did exist which would have necessitated taking of proceedings under section 45-a as .....

M/s. South Indian Plywood Manufacturers' Association, Mysore and Other ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1999(4)KarLJ236

..... 8. after a joint reading of sections 101-a and 101-b, it emerges that all agreements executed before or after the commencement of the karnataka forest (amendment) act were made subject to the provisions of the aforesaid two sections. no party to any such agreement could project any grievance only on the basis of the agreements ..... timber or other forest produce'.under sub-section (3), the holder of any lease, agreement or document granted or entered into after the commencement of karnataka forest (amendment) act, 1980 was held liable to pay at the rate for the time being specified in the rules made or orders issued under sub-section (1), in respect of ..... 101-a, it is provided:'the holder of a lease or agreement or any other document granted or entered into prior to the commencement of the karnataka forest (amendment) act, 1980 and providing for supply of any tree, wood, timber or other forest produce by the state government shall, notwithstanding anything contained in the instrument of lease .....

Advocates' Association, Bangalore Vs. the Chief Minister, Government o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1997Kant18; 1997(1)KarLJ474

..... , affirmed in 442 f supp 362, the court, dealing with the obligation of the state to maintain a penitentiary system which did not violate the eighth amendment aptly and eloquently said : ...the state cannot avoid its constitutional obligation to provide speedy, trial to the accused by pleading financial or administrative inability. the ..... opposite counsel; and his professional colleagues. the advocates are under disciplinary jurisdiction of the state bar councils and bar council of india. section 34 of the act empowers the high courts to lay down conditions-subject to which an advocate is permitted to practice in the high courts and subordinate courts. as rightly ..... to his colleagues. rule l of the said rules among other things provides that, an advocate shall, during the presentation of his case and while otherwise acting before a court, conduct himself with dignity and self respect. rule 2 thereof provides that an advocate shall maintain towards the court a respectful attitude, bearing .....

Shankar Appayya Govakar Vs. Nurudappa Basappa Mali and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : II(1998)ACC575

..... . in choudhdry sahu (dead) by lrs. v. state of bihar (supra), their lordships of the supreme court at paragraphs 6 and 7,dealtwith order 41,rule22,asitexisted prior to its amendment act no. 104 of 76 and laid it down as under:the first part of this rule authorises tine respondent to support the decree not only on the grounds decided in ..... any further, it will be just and proper to refer to the provisions of order 41, rule 22, as it existed prior to 1970 and later on as has been amended by act no. 104 of 1976. rule 22(1) of order 41 unamended as stood originally reads as under:any respondent, though he may not have appealed from any part of ..... the civil procedure code will be applicable to an appeal filed under section 110-d of the motor vehicles act. as a necessary corollary of this, cross-objections could be filed in such an appeal. in our view, this position is placed beyond doubt by the amendment to the provisions of order 41, rule 22 of the code of civil procedure. the explanation to .....

Ritz Hotels (Mysore) Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1996KAR3445; 1996(7)KarLJ600

..... of an earlier judgment of this court in state of karnataka v. h. krishnappa, ilr 1975 kar 1015 wherein it was held:'the effect of amendment of the high court act, 1961, by the amendment act 1973 is that on and after 16th july 1973 petitions under article 226 of the constitution (except those which relate to issue of a writ ..... 227 of the constitution in the state of karnataka are specifically held to be proceedings of the court under rule 2 of the rules in its original jurisdiction. the amendment act 12/73 was enacted for a definite purpose of widening the scope of appellate powers of this court in terms of the report of the law commission, and ..... petition filed under article 227 of the constitution was maintainable. the scope of section 4 of the act in the context of the other provisions of law and particularly the amendment made by amendment act 12/73 is admittedly wider than letters patent orthe acts of the other states which were referred to or relied upon by the division bench in kalpana .....

Janab Shastry Khaja HussaIn Vs. the Karnataka Board of Wakfs and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR817; 1997(4)KarLJ393

..... one reasons. firstly because the scheme purports to have been framed under section 15(2)(d) of the act, which empowered the board to frame schemes of managements for a wakf. this provision was by the wakf amendment act of 1984 omitted from the statute book. the scheme in question is said to have been framed six years ..... a few days later the petitioner filed the present writ petition, this time challenging the showcause notice issued to him, without assailing the order of dissolution. by an amendment, the petitioner was permitted in the year 1996 to challenge the order of dissolution passed by the board and seek a writ of certiorari quashing the same.3. ..... been assailed.2. by an order dated 31st of march 1989, passed by the respondent-board, in exercise of its powers under section 16 of the wakf act 1954, a managing committee comprising 14 members was constituted for the management of the wakf aforementioned. the appointment orders specifically stated that the committee would hold office during .....