Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai Page 100 of about 6,723 results (0.307 seconds)

The Thane Janta Sahakari Bank Vs. Election Commission of India and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR13; 2009(111)BomLR4401; 2010(1)MhLj152

..... respondent also tried to rely upon section 13aa(4) of the representation of peoples act, 1950 (hereinafter for short 'the act of 1950'). the submission on behalf of the respondents is that section 26 of the act of 1951 read with section 13aa of the act of 1950 confers powers on the district election officer to requisition the staff as per the ..... been passed under section 26 and not under section 159.18. apart from that, assuming for a moment that sub-section (4) of section 13aa of the act of 1950 permits the respondents to pass such orders, still the election commission and the chief electoral officer have not passed any order entrusting or delegating the powers to the ..... performing any function which he is authorised to perform under sub-section (2) or sub-section (3), as the case may be.11. section 13aa of the act of 1950 reads thus:13aa. district election officers.(1) for each district in a state, the election commission shall, in consultation with the government of the state, designate or .....

Narayan S/O Gujabrao Bhoyar Vs. Yeotmal Zilla Parishad Karmachari and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR277; 2009(111)BomLR4211; 2009(6)MhLj500

..... arbitrary cannot be just. (reference : divisional controller, ksrtc v. mahadeva shetty and anr. : (2003) 7 scc 197). (refer : supreme court on words and phrases (1950-2008), second edition, by justice r.p. sethi, former judge, supreme court of india, page 739).22. in administrative law and more so in case of the tribunals ..... regulated under the provisions of section 73fff. while the order of removal passed under section 78(1) would remain in force unless disturbed/set aside by the competent authority under the provisions of the act.57. we answer the reference as above and direct the matter to be listed before the appropriate bench for disposal ..... or elementary justice as distinct from complex or technical justice, otherwise much of the justification of having adjudicatory bodies outside the court system will evaporate in thin air. but adherence to that basic principle cannot be ruled out unless for valid and proper reasons the statute specifically exclude such right. (refer : principles of .....

Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, Vs. State of Maharashtra, Departme ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3933

..... the students to claim that irrespective of the eligibility criteria, they should be admitted to course of their choice. suffice it to observe that there is no force in this argument of the petitioners.25. the principal grievance regarding amendment being discriminatory and unreasonable is in the context of the criteria applied in the first part ..... august 2009.-in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 37 read with section 36 of the maharashtra secondary and higher secondary education boards act, 1965 (mah. xli of 1965), the government of maharashtra, after consultation with the maharashtra state board of secondary and higher secondary education, is hereby pleased to amend ..... a number of cases, namely chiranjit lal v. the union of india : 1950 scr 869 : air 1951 sc 41 (b); the state of bombay v. f. n. balsara 1951 scr 652 : air 1951 sc 318 (c); state of west bengal v. anwar ali sarkar : 1952 scr 284 : air 1952 sc 75 (d); kathi raning rawat v. the state of saurashtra, .....

Prakash Ramkrishna Khadse, Vs. Manikrao Ramaji Sonwane and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4137

..... plaintiff.20. shri dharmadhikari learned senior counsel had cited to me the following decisions also.the first decision is reported in abdulla ahmed v. animendra kissen mitter : air 1950 supreme court 15. this decision was cited for explaining the phrase finding a purchaser. i have found that even if plaintiff had not introduced the defendants 4 and ..... appellate court proceeded on the basis that it is for the party who asserts something to prove that thing; and as the defendants alleged that the agreement was forced, it was for them to prove it. but the first appellate court lost sight of the fact that the party who propounds the document will have to prove ..... the property since september 1973 as would appear from the first agreement for sale, claimed that his possession was protected under section 53a of the transfer of property act....section 53a affords protection to a transferee on certain conditions, one of which is that 'the transferee has performed or is willing to perform his part of .....

Dr. Vijay S. Pradhan and Another Vs. Dr. Niteen C. Dedhia and Others

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

..... in o.t.no.5 belonging to lilavati hospital. complainant dr.vijay pradhan has produced affidavit of lt.gen.dr.suresh samartha(retd.) who was commandant of armed forces medical college from 1993-94 till his retirement on superannuation. after retirement, he worked as medical director of bombay hospital from september-1994 to june-1997, then medical ..... the accused persons but in consumer complaint compensation is sought for the deficiency in service, unfair trade practice etc. if complainant is injured in any manner by the acts and omissions of o.ps. this is a civil remedy where as filing of criminal complaint is a criminal prosecution. two proceedings are distinct in nature and ..... contaminates water and can be seen in the water used in the operation theatre. it can also be transmitted to the patient via the aerial route if the air of the operation theatre is not properly sterilized. if, the operation theatre is used for urology and gastro-enterology cases there is a chance of high colony of .....

Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Through Its Chairman - Shri Raikumar B. Guja ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR1

swatanter kumar, c.j.1. the petitioner gramvikas shikshan prasarak mandal is a public charitable trust as well a society duly registered under the public trusts act, 1950, and the societies registration act, 1860, respectively, which claims that it is running one secondary school from 5th to 12th standard at talegaon dhamdhere. the deputy director of education, pune ..... s.s. code are merely executive instructions and do not have force of law and are in the nature of administrative instructions without any statutory force of law. such a view was taken by the supreme court in the state of assam v. ajitkumar sharma : air 1965 sc 1196. this view was even expressed by the supreme ..... court in the case of state of maharashtra v. lok shikshan sanstha : air 1973 sc 588 giving the orders .....

Shailesh Gandhi Vs. State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3896

..... in their names at a huge profit.(c) usurping public lands by declaring fictitious large areas as slums, where only small areas have the slums. often, force, coercion and corruption is used to achieve the nefarious objectives.2. in response to the application of the petitioner dated 27th october 2006 under the right to information ..... rehabilitation authority (hereinafter referred to as 'sra') has started the schemes with extra ordinary powers being given to the authority giving precedence over all other laws in force with the intention of providing houses to 8 lakh slum dwellers by 2000. s.s. tinaikar committee report submitted to the government exposed such activity to a ..... was also made to the order of the court directing the government to create a task force to look into complaints on sra scheme. it was also stated in this letter that sra scheme has resulted due to acts of commission and omission by the state government in multidimensional drawbacks currently gripping the city of mumbai .....

In Re: Adoption of Payal @ Sharinee Vinay Pathak and His Wife Sonika S ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR434; 2009(111)BomLR3816

..... some conflicting statutes, but not statutes that conflict with the adoption provisions. section 1(4) of the juvenile justice act, 2000 provides that:1(4) notwithstanding anything, contained in any other law for the time being in force, the provisions of this act shall apply to all cases involving detention, prosecution, penalty or sentence of imprisonment of juveniles in conflict with law under ..... may be rebutted where the inconsistency cannot be reconciled.' municipal council, palai v. t.j. joseph air 1963 sc 156, 1, 1564 if the 2000 act is held to be inconsistent with the 1956 act, when passing the later act parliament impliedly amended the hindu adoptions and maintenance act, 1956, to permit adoption of children in the specified subclass, irrespective of whether a person has .....

S.R. Ahmad ((Since Deceased) Through His Legal Representatives Mrs. Ma ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4086

..... otherwise authority to create the particular trust, covered by section 79 read with section 80 of the bombay public trusts act, 1950 ?(2) can a person who has once appeared in the proceedings under the bombay public trusts act and has made his contentions therein on the above question, bring a suit in a civil court in respect of ..... property and may direct eviction of such person.15. mr. khare, in support of his contention had relied upon a decision of the full bench of this court in : air 1973 bombay 130 (keki pestonji jamadar and anr. v. khodadad merwan irani and ors.). their lordships had formulated three questions and had answered them. observations are as follows - ..... should not be accepted particularly when the plaintiff was alive and his incapacity to depose is not proved. he relied on a decision of the supreme court reported in : air 2005 sc 439 (janki vashdeo bhojwani and anr. v. indusind bank ltd. and ors.) the supreme court observes as under:12. in the context of the directions .....

Lockwood Industrial and Transport Services Vs. Victoria Timber Supplyi ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(6)BomCR105; 2010(1)MhLj187

..... illegal occupation of the said structures.4. the bombay port trust is the owner of the land bearing survey nos. 11/671 and 12/671 of margaon division admeasuring about 1950 sq. yards. it is an admitted position that the bombay port trust has leased out the said land to m/s kothari saw mills (for short ksm) who had, ..... . in support of the said submission he relied upon the judgment of the apex court in sanwarmal kejriwal v. vishwa cooperative housing society ltd and ors. reported in : air 1990 sc 1563 he then submitted that even assuming that ksm had granted leave and license to defendants, even then the moment bpt terminated lease of ksm, the alleged leave ..... the plaintiff in his plaint does not admit a relation which would attract any of the provisions of the act on which the exclusive jurisdiction given under section 28 depends, we do not think that the defendant by his plea can force the plaintiff to go to a forum where on his averments he cannot go. the interpretation canvassed for by .....