Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: madhya pradesh Page 6 of about 1,367 results (0.086 seconds)

Aug 07 2012 (HC)

In Reference Vs. Vinod

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... is already specified as a special court; or (b) a special court is already constituted, for such offences under any other law for the time being in force. [sc/st(prevention of atrocities) act, 1989].14. special court.- for the purpose of providing for speedy trial, the state government shall, with the concurrence of the chief justice of the high ..... intends to reach, but if the enactment is clear and unambiguous in itself then no preamble can vary its meaning. [a.c.sharma versus delhi administration-air 197.sc 913].4. since the 'act' is silent in respect to the meaning of words child . and child rights . a reference to preamble may render assistance in deriving the real intention ..... ?. in our opinion, this question is squarely covered by the law laid down by the apex court in case of gangula ashok versus state of a.p.-air 200.sc 740.the provisions of section 25 of the act are pari materia to the provisions of section 14 of the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2012 (HC)

Savitri Patel Vs. Bank of Baroda

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... with rule 60 of second schedule of act, 1961. however, section 29 of 1993 act stipulates 29. application of certain provisions of income tax act. the provisions of the second and third schedules to the income tax act, 1961 (43 of 1961), and the income tax (certificate proceedings) rules, 1961, as in force from time to time shall, as far ..... as possible . which appear in section 29 makes the provision of second schedule directory and not mandatory. 24. in iridium india telecom ltd. v. motorola inc. (2005 air scw 138) it is observed: 41. learned counsel for the appellant next contends that even clause 37 of the letters patent establishing the high court of bombay, which ..... be consistent with the provisions of the cpc as amended from time to time.42. the full bench of the high court of calcutta in manickchand v. pratabmull air 1961 cal 483 para 13 had occasion to consider this very contention with regard to clause 37 of the letters patent and observed: "........ the restriction upon the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2012 (HC)

M/S. Maihar Cement Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... right flowing under the relevant rule which was sought to be altered with effect from an anterior date and thereby taking away the benefits available under the rule in force at that time. it has been held that such an amendment having retrospective operation which has the effect of taking away a benefit already available to the employee under ..... case. in consequence, the high court and the tribunal have committed error of law in rejecting the claim for refund. we find no force in the contention. 3. section 17(1)(c) of the limitation act, 1963, would apply only to a suit instituted or an application made in that behalf in the civil suit. the tribunal is the ..... impose new duties in respect of transactions which were complete at the time the amending act came into force. (see nani gopal mitra v. state of bihar, [(1969) 2 scr 411] = (air 1970 sc 1636). 26. in chairman, railway board and others v. c.r. rangadhamaiah and others (air 1997 sc 3828), it is held: 24. in many of these decisions the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2012 (HC)

O.T.G. Global Finance Ltd. and Others Vs. Mohan Mandelia and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2012CrLJ2008

..... . but for the sake of convenience, i would like to quote what the apex court has stated in the case of municipal corporation, indore vs. ratnaprabha reported in (air 1977 sc 308). in the said case, the apex court was dealing with similar principle and proposition of law of interpretation. while dealing with the language of non obstante ..... very case, after pronouncement of the judgment, it was stated that the compromise application has been moved. in the case of state of orissa vs. ram chander agarwala (air 1979 sc 87), it was held by the apex court that once a judgment has been pronounced by a high court either in exercise of its appellate or its revisional ..... construction, it has been observed as under:- "as has been stated, clause (b) of section 138 of the act provides that the annual value of any building shall "notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force" be deemed to be the gross annual rent for which the building might "reasonably at the time of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2011 (HC)

Sunil Kori and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... for any district or a group of districts, such board shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force but save as otherwise expressly provided in this act, have power to deal exclusively with all proceedings under this act relating to juvenile in conflict with law. (6) the powers conferred on the board by or under this ..... before, him. (13) at this juncture, it would be useful to refer the decision of the apex court in the case of jitendra ram alias jitu vs. state of jharkhand (air 2006 sc 1933), the hon. apex court held :- we are, however, not oblivious of the decision of this court in bhola bhagat v. state of bihar [(1997) 8 scc ..... pass an order directing the juvenile court to pass orders in accordance with sections 21 and 22 of the act." we with respect agree to the said approach. (15) in the case of babloo pasi vs. state of jharkhand (air 2009 sc 314), the hon. apex court in paras 15, 16 held:- "..............22. procedure to be followed by a board .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2011 (HC)

Rinku @ Yatendra Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh Gwalior

..... the admitted signature as this power is clearly available under section 73 of the act. (see state (delhi administration) v. pali ram, air 1979 sc 14 : ((1979) 2 scc 158)). (8) in the case of state of maharashtra v. sukhdeo singh (air 1992 sc 2100)=1992 air scw 2486,the apex court held:- it was then submitted, relying on s ..... magistrate first class and the endorsement thereof is effected in the dak book of the police station. he further stated that immediately after receiving the information, the police force proceeded to the spot consisting of suresh singh constable and asi o.p. yadav. during his cross-examination, the witness admitted that the writings of both these documents ..... and handwriting for coming to a conclusion and whether the expert's opinion should be obtained for assistance after exercising powers under section 73 of the indian evidence act. (15) it is trite law that a comparison of the disputed with admitted writings is a piece of evidence on record and it is a method of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 2011 (HC)

Ashish Verma Vs. Neeraj Vyas and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh Indore

..... nowhere pleaded that the firm is already dissolved. thus, the suit of the plaintiff is not covered by any of the exceptions provided in section 69 of the act. in the case of krishna motor service's (supra), the partnership between the parties was already dissolved. in the case of prakash rajmalji jain's case (supra ..... revisionist that the alleged partnership firm, being unregistered, the suit of the present nature is not maintainable in law by virtue of section 69 of the indian partnership act, 1932. on the other hand, shri anand singh, learned counsel for respondent no. 1 supported the impugned order. 7) on due consideration of the material available ..... specified in the second schedule to the provincial small cause courts act, 1887 (9 of 1887), or to any proceeding in execution or other proceeding incidental to or arising from any such suit or claim. 8) learned counsel for respondent placed reliance on decisions reported as air 1983 delhi 134 (jagat mittar saigal v. kailash chander saigal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 2011 (HC)

Managing Director Vs. Prantiya Rajya Parivahan Karmachari Sangh (Congr ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh Indore

..... or whose dismissal, discharge or retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the air force act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the army act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer or other employee of a prison; ..... karmachari sangh (congress) (respondent no.1) whereas second respondent-madhya pradesh state road transport corporation is established under section 3 of the road transport corporation act, 1950. there was a memo of settlement (annexure p/4) dated 03.02.1988 in form 'm' as per section 43 of the mp industrial relations ..... petitioner, notice under section 31 (2) of the mpir act stood vitiated on account of the aforesaid amendment of the act and fresh proceedings for the reference under section 10 of the id act ought to have been initiated. submission of the petitioner's learned counsel is having no force, firstly because the order of reference was made vide .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 2011 (HC)

Sakir Mewati and Another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh Gwalior

..... for any district or a group of districts, such board shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force but save as otherwise expressly provided in this act, have power to deal exclusively with all proceedings under this act relating to juvenile in conflict with law. (6) the powers conferred on the board by or under this ..... this juncture, it would be useful to refer the decision of the apex court in the case of in the case of jitendra ram alias jitu v. state of jharkhand (air 2006 sc 1933), the hon. apex court held :- we are, however, not oblivious of the decision of this court in bhola bhagat v. state of bihar [(1997) 8 scc ..... pass an order directing the juvenile court to pass orders in accordance with sections 21 and 22 of the act." we with respect agree to the said approach. (15) in the case of babloo pasi v. state of jharkhand (air 2009 sc 314), the hon. apex court in paras 15, 16 held :- "..............22. procedure to be followed by a board in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 2011 (HC)

Rameshwar NekhrA. Vs. the State Bar Council of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... elected chairman on the ground that the statute had not changed the common law. the correctness of the law laid down in that decision was assailed by placing reliance on air 1954 sc 210 jagan nath vs jaswant singh, (1982) 1 scc 691 jyoti basu v. debi ghoshal, (1984) 1 scc 91 arun kumar bose v. mohd. furkan ansari and ( ..... not been sown any logical reason or precedent for disagreeing with the above submission of the respondents. on the other hand in v.t. khanzode v. reserve bank of india air 1982 sc 917 (924) it has been held it is well settled that where a specific power is conferred without prejudice to the generality of a power already conferred, the ..... rules framed under provisions of a statute form part of the statute. in other words, rules have statutory force. 22. on point (e) of para 16 above, it was urged from the petitioners side that if section 15(1) of the act is taken to be the13 source of power for framing rules prescribing the tenure for an elected chairman, and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //