Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: madhya pradesh Page 2 of about 1,367 results (0.087 seconds)

The State Vs. Gayadin

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960MP188; 1960CriLJ917

..... in a case by a special judge does lie to high court under section 417 of the cr. p. code.6. mr. dey, learned counsel for the respondent relies upon air 1933 cal 776 (1), no doubt in the calcutta case it is laid down that 'an appeal to the high court by the local government from an order of acquittal ..... , 427 and 428 of the. cr. p. code. 5. i feel further fortified in my opinion by section 21 of the act which runs thus:'the provisions of the code and of any other law for the time being in force in so far as they may be applicable and in so far as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of ..... convicted person can file an appeal to the high court, yet there is nothing in the act to entitle the government to file an appeal against acquittal. in support of his contention he relies upon supdt. and remembrancer of legal affairs bengal v. luchmi narayan, air 1933 cal 776(1).4. it is true that there is no express provision in section .....

M.P. Oil Extraction Limited Vs. State Trading Corporation of India and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... out of legal relationship, whether contractual or not, considered as commercial under the law in force in india, made on or after the 11th day of october, 1960- (a) in pursuance of an agreement in writing for arbitration to which the convention ..... facts, the judgment cited by the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 in the case of satyadhyan ghosal and others vs. smt. deorajin debi and another, air 1960 sc 941, is not applicable in the present case. 15. consequently, the appeal filed by the appellant is hereby allowed. the impugned order dated 22.11 ..... appeal memo. in the aforesaid rule, the details of arbitration procedure, award of arbitration, provisions of appeal has been prescribed. section 44 of part-ii of the act 1996 defines which reads as under:- 44. definition.- in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, foreign award means an arbitral award on differences between persons arising .....

M/s. C.E.C. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... argued that once the claim was rejected by the superintending engineer on 15.4.1988 then in view of the fact that the dispute arose prior to coming into force of the amended adhiniyam on 20th april, 1991, the claim should have been filed within the period of three years from the date of its rejection and in ..... division bench : 6. ...before section 7-b, no period of limitation was provided for filing reference application before the tribunal. whether the provision of section 113 of limitation act, 1963 was applicable or not, it has become immaterial after insertion of sub-section (2) which provide a special limitation for filing reference application within a period of one ..... the period for institution for reference i.e. three years should be from 31.3.1989 when according to the tribunal itself the contract was terminated because of the act of the petitioner and if that be so, then the claim was within limitation. that apart, on the question of limitation as an alternate submission was raised. .....

Pawan Arora Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... selective application of aforesaid procedure as per their choice which otherwise lacks legal sanction, as brought on record in the rejoinder-affidavit. this court finds substantial force in the submission advanced by the petitioner as regards right for consideration of applications and documents in the pending application at the time of scheduled meeting for ..... promoting healthy competition amongst the applicants aspiring for stage carriage permits; (vii) the impugned notice and the stipulations as contained therein besides being contrary to the act of 1988 and the judgment of hon'ble apex court in the case of mithilesh garg (supra), even otherwise is totally arbitrary and only to defeat ..... 80 and section 88 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 in mithilesh garg vs. union of india and others, : air 1992 sc 443 held that a bare perusal of the relevant comparative provisions of the motor vehicles act, 1939 and the motor vehicles act, 1988 (referred to as the act of 1988) makes it clear that grant of .....

Rajendra Kumar Verma Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... deal with such complaints in accordance with law including by registration of criminal action against the persons indulging in such unauthorized activity of intimidating the public to force them to donate involuntarily for the installation of pandals for arranging functions. 37. our attention was invited to the order passed by the national green ..... out. the above said guidelines are issued in exercise of power conferred on this court under articles 141 and 142 of the constitution. these would remain in force until modified by this court or superseded by an appropriate legislation. (v) generally 178. 1. the states shall make provision for seizure and confiscation of ..... but also articles 48a and 51a(g) of the constitution of india. the petitioner has also placed reliance on the provisions of the air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1982 (in short "the act of 1982") and the noise pollution (regulation and control) rules, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as "the central rules of 2000"). .....

Kalpana Shivhare and Another Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... title, having recorded a 'mamuli maurusi' for sam. year 2007 was a pakka tenant, as defined u/s 54 (vii) of the m. p. land revenue and tenancy act, 1950 and on coming into force of m. p. land revenue code, the bhumiswami rights have been acquired by operation of law. rule issued on 20.11.93 is made absolute. the petition stands ..... sufficient reason. the words "any other sufficient reason" have been interpreted in chhajju ram, (1921-22) 49 ia 144 and approved by this court in moran mar basselios catholicos, air 1954 sc 526 to mean " a reason sufficient on grounds at least analogous to those specified in the rule" 19. in the present case, it is clear that the admissions ..... substantial right when a person's property is being threatened with acquisition; such right cannot be taken away as if by a side wind (nandeshwar prasad v. state of up air 1964 sc 1217)." 22. further the supreme court in the case of n.padmamma and others vs. s.ramakrishna reddy and others reported in (2008) 15 scc 517, held .....

M/s. G.D. Oil and Floor Mill Vs. Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... circumstances. this power is recognised by supreme court in sri seetaram rice mill (supra). at the time of decision of harsh wood products (supra), 2003 act did not come into force and there was no such enabling provision like (1a) aforesaid. in view of this enabling provision, i am unable to hold that action of respondent is ..... vitran company ltd., bhopal and others). however, he submits that another similar matter like hotel adityaz (supra) was decided by gujarat high court. it is reported in 2014 air cc 497 (guj) (shree vardhaman salt works v. dakshin gujarat vij co. ltd. and anr.). he submits that against the judgment of this court in hotel adityaz ltd ..... are equipped with the power to prepare supplementary bill and determine the amount to be mentioned in the supplementary bill. the special provision is made in the electricity act whereby giving power to the special court to determine the quantum of "civil liability". the special court will determine the actual amount and in the event any .....

Umesh Datt Tiwari @ Ballan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... this respect in paragraphs 8, 9, 10 and 11 read thus : "8. the expression "is engaged or is about to be engaged" in the commission of offence involving force or violence or an offence punishable under chapter xii, xvi or xvii or under section 506 or 509 of the indian penal code, 1860 or in the abetment of any ..... on their part as regards safety of person or property. construing a pari materia provision in section 27 of the city of bombay police act, 1902 in gurbachan singh vs. the state of bombay and another, air 1952 sc 221, the supreme court observed :- "the law is certainly an extra-ordinary one and has been made only to meet those ..... by the petitioner that without conducting any enquiry with respect to the subjective satisfaction of the district magistrate in relation to the provisions of sections 5 and 6 of the act, without extending any opportunity to the petitioner to rebut such evidence, if collected, only on the basis of the police report the order impugned was passed against him .....

Anil Trivedi and Another Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... announced. 23. counsel for the respondent has placed reliance upon the judgment of the supreme court in the matter of meghraj kothari vs. delimitation commission and others reported in air 1967 sc 669, in the matter of lakshmi charan sen and others vs. a.k.m. hassan uzzaman and others reported in 1985(4) scc 689, in ..... after taking note of the principle laid down in the constitution bench judgment in the matter of n.p. ponnuswami vs. returning officer [air 1952 sc 64] and mohinder singh gill vs. chief election commissioner [air 1978 sc 851] has, while considering article 329(b) containing the similar bar, held that if the petition presented to the court " ..... is identical to the provisions of section 405 of the m.p. municipal corporation act, 1956 which is under consideration before this court. therefore, the order of the division bench in the matter of abhinsh mahore (supra) will apply in full force in the present case also and in terms thereof, the governor himself was required to consider .....

Ramjilal Vs. State of MP and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... defined in the adhiniyam of 1990, but has been appropriately explained by the apex court in one of it's earliest decisions, i.e. romesh thappar v. state of madras : air 1950 sc 124 (para 7), which holds the field till date as per ramlila maidan incident in re (2012) 5 scc 1 (para 37). 14. thus, there is a clear ..... 1990 can further be categorized into two sub ingredients as follows :- (i) there are reasonable grounds for believing that the person is engaged in the commission of an offence involving force or violence or an offence punishable under chapter xii, xvi or xvii or u/s. 506 or 509 of ipc or in abatement of any such offence; or (ii) there ..... distinction between a mere breach of peace and breach in public order. unless any person is involved in such an act or acts, which disturbs the normal rhythm of life of the general public at large of a particular community, locality or area, the disturbance in public order cannot be presumed by the .....