Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 8,310 results (0.347 seconds)

Office Of The Odisha Lokayukta Vs. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in respect of whom the jurisdiction is exercisable by any court or other authority under the army act, 1950, the air force act, 1950, the navy act, 1957 and the coast guard act, 1978 or the procedure is applicable to such public servant under those acts; 10 . .18. chapter vii prescribes the procedure in respect of preliminary inquiry and investigation ..... upon the lokayukta to afford an opportunity of hearing to the public servant as referred to under sections 20(2) and 20(3) of the act, 2014. a complete inbuilt procedure has been prescribed under chapter vii for conducting preliminary inquiry and investigation within the powers of the lokayukta. chapter viii ..... after taking into consideration the contents of the complaint and the supporting documents annexed thereto, in exercise of power conferred under section 20(1) of the act, 2014 directed the directorate of vigilance, odisha, cuttack to conduct a preliminary inquiry against respondent no.1 and submit a report within two months with .....

The Bharat Bank Ltd., Delhi Vs. the Employees of the Bharat Bank Ltd., ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1950]SuppSCR317

..... empowers this court to hear all appeals which under existing laws could heard by the federal court of india. by the abolition of the privy council jurisdiction act, 1949, which came into force on the 10th october, 1949, all the powers that were possessed by the judicial committee of the privy council in regard to cases or matters arising ..... delhi in respect to the cases which were connected with the delhi branch of the appellants and as a result of the same, made their award on 19th january, 1950, holding that 26 persons, who were employees under the appellants, were improperly dismissed by the latter and should be reinstated. further directions were given in the award regarding ..... the dismissed employees. this award was declared to be binding in terms of the provisions of secs. 15 and 19 of the industrial disputes act by the central government on 30th of january, 1950, and it was directed to remain in operation for a period of one year. it is against this award that the present appeal has .....

The Bharat Bank Ltd., Delhi Vs. Employees of the Bharat Bank Ltd., Del ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1950SC188; (1950)NULLLLJ921SC; (1950)ILLJ921SC; [1950]1SCR459

..... empowers this court to hear all appeals which under existing laws could be heard by the federal court of india. by the abolition of privy council jurisdiction act, 1949, which came into force on the 10th october, 1949, all the powers that were possessed by the judicial committee of the privy council in regard to cases or matters arising ..... delhi in respect to the cases which were connected with the delhi branch of the appellants and as a result of the same, made their award on 19th january, 1950, holding that 26 persons, who were employees under the appellants were improperly dismissed by the latter and should be reinstated. further directions were given in the award regarding ..... to the dismissed employees. this award was declared to be binding in terms of the provisions of sections 15 and 19 of the industrial disputes act by the central government on 30th of january, 1950, and it was directed to remain in operation for a period of one year, it is against this award that the present appeal has .....

Harish Chandra Bajpai Vs. Triloki Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1957SC444; [1957]1SCR370

..... , r. 17 applies to proceedings before election tribunals. mr. k. s. krishnaswami ayyangar, learned counsel for the respondent, contends that it does, by force of s. 90(2) of the act, under which the tribunal is to try a petition 'as nearly as may be in accordance with procedure applicable under the code of civil procedure, 1908 ..... permit an amendment raising a new charge, it did not under the circumstances exercise a sound and judicial discretion in permitting the amendment in question. there is considerable force in this contention. the election petition was filed on june 10, 1952, which was the last date allowed under s. 81 and r. 119. it contained ..... were declared elected, they having secured the largest number of votes. on june 10, 1952, the respondent herein filed a petition under s. 81 of the act alleging that the appellants had committed a number of corrupt practices, and prayed that the election might be declared wholly void. 2. the appellants filed written statements denying .....

The Associated Hotels of India, Ltd. and anr. Vs. R.B. Jodha Mal Kutha ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC156; [1961]1SCR259

..... as a result of the combined operation of order g.g.o. 3 made on february 25, 1948, and the provisions of the federal court (jurisdiction enlargement) act, 1 of 1950, the federal court must be deemed to have come into existence and must be deemed to have had powers to entertain appeals from the decrees of the high courts ..... was raised was in regard to the validity of the order itself. it was urged that after the indian constitution was adopted the indian independence act and orders issued thereunder were no longer in force having regard to the provisions of art. 395 of the constitution. this argument was also rejected. we may add that the respondent has not ..... longer in operation in pakistan. in our opinion, this consideration is hardly relevant in construing the material provisions of the order. so long as the order remains in force and has neither been modified or repealed it is the duty of the courts in india to consider its provisions in a fair and reasonable manner and to give full .....

The Engineering Mazdoor Sabha Representing Workmen Employed Under the ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1963SC874; [1963(6)FLR103]; (1962)IILLJ760SC; [1963]Supp1SCR625

..... mukherjea, j., who delivered the unanimous opinion of the court observed that it was well settled by the majority decision of this court in the case of bharat bank ltd. : (1950)nullllj921sc , that the expression 'tribunal' as used in art. 136 does not mean the same thing as 'court' but includes, within its ambit, all adjudicating bodies, provided they are ..... by an award made by such an arbitrator should be denied the protection of the relevant provisions of the arbitration act as well as the protection of the appellate jurisdiction of this court under art. 136. there is some force in this connection, it appears that in enacting section 10a the legislature probably did not realise that the position of ..... have applied. 24. on behalf of the appellants, reliance has been placed on a recent decision of the bombay high court in the case of the air corporations employees union v. d. v. vyas (1961) 64 bom. l.r. 1. in that case, the bombay high court has held that an arbitrator functioning under s. .....

A.P. Krishnasami Naidu Etc. Vs. State of Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC1515; [1964]7SCR82

..... family; nor are we able to understand why this discrimination which clearly result from the application of s. 5(1) of the act is not violative of art. 14 of the constitution. examples can be multiplied with reference to joint hindu families which would show that ..... . 14 in the same manner as s. 58 of the kerala act was struck down. 5. we are of opinion that this contention is correct and the ratio of that case applies with full force to the present case. it was observed in that case that 'where ..... the constitutionality of the madras land reforms (fixation of ceiling on land act, no. 58 of 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the act), which was assented to by the president on april 13, 1962 and came into force on publication in the fort st. george gazette on may 2, ..... 1962. the constitutionality of the act is attacked on the ground that it violates arts. 14, 19 and 31(2) of .....

The Sawatram Ramprasad Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Baliram Ukandaji and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC616; (1966)ILLJ41SC; 1963MhLJ101(SC); [1966]1SCR764

..... . it is not disputed that it applied to the textile industry. the c. p. & berar industrial disputes (settlement) act (23 of 1947) came into force on june 2, 1947 but only the first section was then brought into force. later, remaining sections were brought into force by a notification dated november 20, 1947 in all industries except the textile industry. from march 1, 1951 ..... government under the above section admittedly have been delegated to the second labour court bombay. section 31 of this amending act provides as follows :- '31. act not to override state laws. (1) if, immediately before the commencement of this act, there is in force in any state any provincial act or state act relating to the settlement or adjudication of disputes, the operation of such an .....

City Municipal Council, Mangalore and anr. Vs. Frederick Pais Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC417; (1969)3SCC160; [1970]2SCR751

..... had already come into force. till the mysore act came into force, the mangalore municipality was governed by the madras district municipalities act, 1920 (act v of 1920) (hereinafter called the madras act). the madras act had provided for levy of property tax, the procedure to be adopted for ..... madras state and which, on reorganisation of the states, became part of the state of mysore. the mysore municipalities act, 1964 (act xxii of 1964) (hereinafter referred to as the mysore act) came into force from april 1, 1965 as per the notification, dated september 23, 1965 issued by the state government. certain sections ..... interpretation had been placed on section 382 of the mysore act. according to the learned counsel, normally, after the coming into force of the mysore act, no assessments could be made under the madras act, but section 382 of the mysore act, repealing the madras act, had made certain special provisions the existence of which .....

Shankar Prahlad Deshpande and ors. Vs. Seth Gendalal Motilal Patni and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1969)3SCC691; [1970]3SCR177

..... for executing the decree.2. on march 31, 1951, the madhya pradesh abolition of proprietary rights (estates, mahals, alienated lands) act 1 of 1951 was brought into force. by virtue of section 3 of that act the proprietary rights of holders of estates, mahals, alienated villages and alienated lands stood vested in the state. chapter iv of the ..... act provided for 'determination of debts'. the mortgagor prahlad applied on april 26, 1951 to the claims officer under section 19 of that act for ' ..... filed by the mortgagee the additional district judge held that there was a secured debt within the meaning of section 19 read with section 17(1) of the act due to the mortgagee under the mortgage, notwithstanding the decree passed by the civil court.5. on october 3, 1955, the high court of nagpur in jethalal .....