Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: kerala Page 30 of about 1,514 results (0.507 seconds)

Velukutty Vs. Kerala Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1967]20STC28(Ker)

..... that will apply. in this view of section 58, the application of the appellant for confirmation pending on the date when central act 31 of 1950 came into force had to be dealt with and disposed of under this act and the order of confirmation passed in 1952 would clearly be subject to the revisional power of the custodian general under section 27 ..... act 31 of 1950) providing that 'anything done or any action taken in exercise of any power conferred by or under the (repealed) ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken in the exercise of the powers conferred by or under this act, as if this act were in force on the day on which such thing was done or action ..... of the said act.applying this reasoning to the relevant words of section 61(1), it has to be held, that the petitioner .....

Macki Fernandez Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1961)IILLJ486Ker

..... of the indian civil service. one of the grounds taken before the supreme court was that the inquiry conducted against the officer in question under the public servants (inquiries) act, 1950, was illegal and that the conduct of the public servant should have been inquired into only under rule 55 of the civil services (classification, control and appeal; rules. ..... clause (2) of the said notification is to the effect: the last rule beginning with ' notwithstanding anything contained' and ending with 'as if these rules have not come into force' shall be numbered as ' rule 9'.133. therefore, as rule 8 stands, there are 14 sub-rules and para. 2 of old sub-rule (13) which has now ..... the government in exercise of powers conferred by the proviso to article 309 of the constitution. 73. rule 1(b) states that the rules are to come into force on 1 january 1960 and under clause (c) the rules apply to all officers under the rulemaking control of the state government other than those referred to in article .....

Bhoopesh Vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2009(3)KLJ74

..... context, it would be profitable to refer to the bench decision of the punjab and haryana high court reported in union territory, chandigarh v. permanent lok adalat and anr. air 2009 p&h; 496. it has been held in the said decision at paragraph 8 as follows:the power to decide dispute under sub-section (8) is not ..... purposes of section 22 and 23, unless the context otherwise requires,:(a) ...(b) 'public utility service' means any:(i) transport service for the carriage of passengers or goods by air, road or water; or(ii) postal, telegraph or telephone service; or(iii) supply of power, light or water to the public by any establishment; or(iv) system of ..... of natural justice, objectivity, fair play, equity and other principles of justice. the award thus passed by the permanent lok adalat is also haying the status and force of the decree.5. under section 22b of the act, the permanent lok adalat has jurisdiction only in respect of one or more of public utility services as defined under the .....

P.M. Sajan Vs. The Land Acquisition Officer Special Tahsildar and Othe ...

Court : Kerala

..... case of simultaneous repeal and re-enactment, the reenactment is to be considered as reaffirmation of the old law and the provisions of the repealed act which are thus re-enacted continue in force uninterruptedly. it appears that judicial opinion in america on this point is not quite uniform and we do not consider it necessary to express any ..... such incompatibility with the preservation of old rights and liabilities is to be ascertained this court in state of punjab v. mohar singh, 1955 (1) scr 893 : (air 1955 sc 84) said: "............. such incompatibility would have to be ascertained from a consideration of all the relevant provisions of the new law and the mere absence of a ..... or liability and the legal proceedings may be continued as if the repealing act has not been passed. 20. the apex court in state of punjab v. mohar singh pratap singh [air 1955 sc 84] has held that section 6 applies even where the repealing act contains fresh legislation on the same subject but in such a case one .....

Kuriachan Chacko and Others Vs. The Secretary to Government Home (C) D ...

Court : Kerala

..... ii of the state roll in any court or tribunal or before any person or other authorities mentioned in section 30 of the act. (ii) where a senior advocate has been engaged prior to the coming into force of the rules in this chapter, he shall not continue thereafter unless an advocate in part ii of the state roll is ..... any pleading (c) application in any court or tribunal. thus a senior advocate cannot do the above three things. the expression to act came up for consideration before the delhi high court in saraswati v. tulsi ram (air 1971 delhi 110). in the above case a suit was filed in a trial court for mandatory injunction. in the suit a ..... respondent, it is not affirmed by the petitioners that such criticisms have been made with notice to 4th respondent, and, after hearing him, exception was taken over the act / acts purported to have been done by him. fourth respondent is a designated senior advocate of this court. designation of a senior advocate is undoubtedly an honour bestowed on a .....

M. James Thomas and Ors. Vs. the Hon'ble the Chief Justice represented ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1977Ker166; (1978)IILLJ226Ker

..... laws which were actually in existence at the time the defence of india act came into force. the high court of patna has dissented from the view taken by the calcutta high court as to the construction of the words 'for the tune being ..... was noticed by the high court of calcutta in e. i. film studios v. p. k. mukherjee (air 1954 cal 41). that concerned the expression 'for the time being in force' of section 19 (1) (g) of the defence ef india act, 1939 and in the context of that enactment the calcutta high court held that the expression refers only to ..... leave rules, madras pension code, the general provident fund (madras) rules, the madras contributory provident fund pension insurance rules 1950, and the rules regulating the pay of the services and other rules for the time being in force applicable to the officers under the rule-making control of the governor or government of kerala, as the case may be .....

Steel Industrials Kerala Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(4)KLT81

..... social security measures for legal profession may be provided, shall be as prescribed by rules made by government.'4. though the aforesaid is part of the cf act that came into force on 1-2-1962, the kerala legal benefit fund rules, 1991 were made by the government in exercise of power conferred by sub-section (4) of ..... ancillary and subsidiary matters which can fairly and reasonably be said to be comprehended in it. this position of law was particularly emphasized in united provinces v. atiga begum (air 1941 ec. 16). the same position was affirmed by the supreme court in hans mailer's case : 1955crilj876 , wherein it was observed that it is well settled ..... laying. a simple laying requirement, providing no affirmative procedure, is only directory and does not affect the validity of the law or its coming into force. (see atlas cycle industries ltd.'s case, air 1979 sc 1149 and the quarry owners association's case, : air2000sc2870 ).the impact of section 2(2) on section 76 of cf act21. section .....

Moosakoya Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008CriLJ2388

..... a case in which, a police officer may, in accordance with the first schedule or under any other law for the time being in force, arrest without warrant;therefore, making the offences under the sand act cognizable, police officers will get the power to arrest without warrant. chapter xi of cr.p.c. deals with preventive action to be taken ..... to register a case on the basis of such information.7. this view was reiterated by the supreme court in ramesh kumar v. state (nct of delhi) and ors. 2006 air scw 1021 : 2006 cri lj 1622. there is substantial difference between the term 'cognizable offence' and 'cognizable case' as can be seen from the definition under section 2(c ..... 61 of the apex court judgment in ghaziabad zilla sahkari bank ltd. v. addl. labour commissioner and ors. 2007 air scw 956.6. now, we shall consider the arguments based on section 24 of the sand act making all offences under the act cognizable. a 'cognizable offence' is defined in section 2(c) of cr.p.c. as follows:(c) ' .....

Cheranallur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala, Repres ...

Court : Kerala

..... where a legal fiction is created, full effect must be given to it and it should be carried to its logical end. - boucher pierre andre v. superintendent, central jail (air 1975 sc 164). in construing and applying a deeming provision, the limits of that deeming provision have to be determined and within those limits, the situation that is to be ..... in clause (i) of sec.2 the decision thereon of the registrar shall be final." 10. by act 1 of 2000, which came into force with effect from 2.1.2003, section 69 of the act was amended. section 69 of the act, as amended by act 1 of 2000, reads as follows: "69. disputes to be decided by co-operative arbitration court.- ( ..... payable to or by a society, whether such claim be admitted or not."as held by the apex court in co-operative central bank ltd. v. additional industrial tribunal (air 1970 sc 245), whatever a society does or is necessarily required to do for the purpose of carrying out its objects, such as laying down the conditions of service of .....

E. Satheesh Kumar Vs. Malabar Devaswam Board and Others

Court : Kerala

..... destruction of public and private properties v. state of andhra pradesh, 2009 (2) khc 374 : 2009 (5) scc 212 : 2009 (2) klt 552 (sc) : 2009 (1) kld 664 : air 2009 sc 2266 : 2009 crilj 2807 : 2009 (5) scale 638. in that case, taking serious note of large scale destruction of public and private properties in the name of agitations ..... the candle - stick maker - shall we add, the bonded labour and pavement dweller." 10. in kesab narayan banerjee and another v. the state of bihar, 1985 khc 795: air 1985 sc 1666 it was held that the direction to deposit rupees one lakh as a condition for granting bail is "excessively onerous." 11. in syamkumar v. state of kerala ..... imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for seven years or more. s.6 of the pdpp act states that the provisions of the act shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the provisions of any other law for the time being in force. the scheme of the pdpp act when considered alongwith s.437 of the code of criminal procedure, it would be .....