Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air force act 1950 chapter 1 preliminary Court: kerala Page 25 of about 1,514 results (0.116 seconds)

State of Kerala and Another Vs. Balakrishna Menon.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1965]58ITR775(Ker)

..... aliyasanthana family or branch or marumakkathayam tarward which had previously been assessed as undivided should be considered as disrupted for the purposes of the agricultural income-tax act, 1950, unless and until there has been a physical division of the properties by metes and bounds.we are fortified in this view by the decisions in ..... that the tarward has hitherto been assessed as undivided, and that those assessments have become final.sub-section (1) of section 29 of the agricultural income-tax act, 1950 (omitting the proviso thereto), reads as follow :'where at the time of making an assessment under section 18, it is claimed by or on behalf of ..... is whether the assessment made on the assumption that the assessee is an undivided marumakkathayam tarwad is justified or no the assessment is under the agricultural income-tax act, 1950, and the assessment year concerned is the financial year which ended on the 31st march, 1962. the contention of the appellants - the state of kerala and .....

K.P.S.C. Reserve Conductors Rank Holders Assn. and ors. Vs. State and ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1997)ILLJ599Ker

..... from the list on the requisition made by the corporation.3. in the instant case, no such direction as contemplated by section 34 of the road transport corporations act, 1950 has been issued by the government to the corporation except those contained in letter no. 2976/al/85/tr-d dated june 24, 1995, g.o. ( ..... the government are binding on the corporation. kerala legislature enacted the kerala public service commission (additional functions as respects the kerala state road transport corporation) act, 1970. that act came into force with effect from february 9, 1970 when it was published in the kerala gazette after the governor's assent. thereafter, all the posts under the ..... public service commission which expired, was to be operated on for filling up temporary vacancies came up for consideration in state of haryana v. m.p.sharma, air 1994 sc 1804. their lordships took the view that if the appointing authority chooses to make appointments on ad hoc basis, then certainly the candidates in the .....

Krishnan Moothan Vs. V.K.A. Krishnankutty Moothan

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1960Ker348; 1960CriLJ1464

..... . 2. i am satisfied that the order complained against cannot stand for the simple reason that the essential requirement of the offence having been attended by criminal force or show of force or by criminal intimidation, and of dispossession having been effected by such means, is not present. the conviction is based on the finding that the accused, ..... view i am taking was taken in the division bench ruling in subramonia chetty v. ganesan pillai, (1950) 1 mad lj 670: (air 1950 mad 665), and it seems to have been assumed in usman miya v. amir miya, air 1927 nag 131 and air 1949 mad 191. 8. i allow the petition and set aside the ordermade by the appellate court under ..... at any time within one month from the date of the conviction. on an ordinary and natural construction of the section, this limitation must apply also to a court which, acting under sub-section (3), wants to pass an order under sub-section (1). and, in relation to such a court, the words, 'when convicting such persons or .....

Divakaran Vs. Dy. Director of Fisheries and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1975Ker9

..... is required for the use of the fishing stakes in the area. the petitioner has stated that the rules originally framed under the cochin fisheries act continue in force in the area. the question that arises is whether a license holder can object to fishing by a non-license holder. according to me the principle pointed out by ..... . richmond confirming authority, howitt, ex parte reported in (1921-1 kb 248) has been accepted and followed by this court in paul v. state, 1966 ker lt 1173 = (air 1967 ker 71). there govindan nair, j. (as he then was) said:'whenever an interest distinct from the general inconvenience which may be suffered by the law being wrongly administered ..... decision of the supreme court in nagar rice and flour mills v. teekappa gowda, 1970-1 scwr 627 = (air 1971 sc 246), where the court had considered the scope of sections 5 and 8 of the rice milling industry (regulation) act, 1958 with particular reference to the questions as to whether the owner of an existing rice mill in the .....

Joseph Thomas Vs. Agricultural Income-tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [1981]127ITR764(Ker)

..... judge dismissed the writ petition.8. the question on these facts and circumstances before us is whether grounds existed to rectify the order under section 36 of the act. the only ground under the section on which rectification of the orders is permissible is a mistake apparent on the record of the appeal, revision, assessment or ..... before the tribunal. neither the tribunal nor the state representative denied what was stated above at the time of hearing of the application filed under section 36 of the act. '7. the learned judge, in the course of his judgment under appeal, after noticing ex. p-14 and the impression under which the counsel was left ..... of the land included in the assessment order. the appellant filed ex. p-l2 application for rectification of the order of the tribunal under section 36 of the act, read with article 24 of the kerala agricultural income-tax appellate tribunal regulations, 1965. these provisions may conveniently be reproduced :'36. rectification of mistakes.--(1) the .....

S. Abdul Salam and Others Vs. Union of India Represented by Its Secret ...

Court : Kerala

..... furtherance to the steps taken by the govt. of india to give effect to the 'hague protocol' as well, being a signatory to the same, act 69 of 1972 (carriage by air act, 1972) was brought into force w.e.f. 15.05.1973, after receipt of the assent of the president of this republic on 19.12.1972. 14. drastic changes were ..... position, that the matter has to be dealt with as per the provisions of the carriage by air act, 1972, as amended by the montreal convention of 1999 (incorporated under the iii schedule to the act), to the exclusion of all other law in force in india. the scope of the relevant provision, particularly with regard to the extent of liability under ..... applicable pursuant to the hague protocol and embodied under carriage by air act, 1972 to the extent they are applicable, as the case may be. the rules contained in the 'third schedule' along with section 4a and 6a and sub-section (3) of section 8 were brought into force pursuant to act 28 of 2009, with intent to give effect to the .....

Sri.V.Shivaprasad Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : ILR2011(1)Ker697

..... institution of self government in respect of the matters entrusted to it. (3) the government shall, as soon as may be after the coming into force of this act, transfer all institutions, schemes, buildings, other properties, assets and liabilities connected with the matters mentioned in the first schedule, to the municipalities concerned."it ..... raised by the government. thefollowing are among the decisions cited by both sides, which discussescertain general principles. 60. the apex court in sukhdev v. bhagatram (air 1975 sc 1331)held in para 33 that " there is no substantial difference between a rule and aregulation inasmuch as both are subordinate legislation under powersconferred by ..... of municipal authorities to those of panchayatsin areas included in a scheme.-- when any particular panchayatarea in which the travancore-cochin panchayats act, 1950, is inforce is comprised in a town planning scheme made or intended tobe made by a municipal council then, notwithstanding anything inthe said .....

Augustine Mathai Vs. Appellate Authority

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ780Ker

..... above. i am of the view that the first respondent was justified in accepting the preliminary objection that the church is not a commercial establishment under the act. the church and the employment do not satisfy the requirements of the definitions of commercial establishment, establishment, shop or employment. there is no reason for ..... that the church is having commercial and profit making activities and he was employed in that activity and therefore he will come within the purview of the act. management of certain plantations and institutions belonging to the church are said to be the commercial activities. the church admits having plantations and institutions. but ..... which such work is going on cannot be said to be an establishment coming within the purview of the act. the decisions in sasidharan v. peter & karunakaran (1978 klt 613) and v. sasidharan v. peter & karunakaran (air)-1984 sc-1700) considered the question of the office of a lawyer where some intellectual pursuit or activity .....

State Circle Inspector of Excise and ors. Etc.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 1992CriLJ570

..... penal code shall be investigated, enquired into, tried and otherwise dealt with according to the same provisions, but subject to any enactment for the time being in force regulating the manner or place of investigating, inquiring into, trying or otherwise dealing with such offences. it is important to note that the purpose and object of ..... but undefined conception in criminal jurisprudence. judicial decisions have indicated the character and nature of cognizance in criminal jurisprudence. in ajit kumar v. state of w. b., air 1963 sc 765 :(1963 (1) cri lj 797), the supreme court observed that (para 19):the word 'cognizance' has no esoteric or mystic significance in criminal law ..... excluded'.5. in an earlier decision of the calcutta high court in ajit kumar v. state, air 1961 cal 560 : 1961 (2) cri lj 617 (fb)), while considering the provisions of the west bengal criminal law amendment (special courts) act (21 of 1949) it was held that the provisions of the criminal p.c. taking cognizance .....

Velayudha Pillai Raman Nair Vs. Krishnan Asari Many

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1989Ker263

..... is not barred for the reason of the dismissal of an earlier suit for redemption and relies on the decisions in subba rao v. raju, air 1950 fc i and reghunath singh v. m. t. hansraj, air 1934 pc 205 in support of the proposition. it is well settled that the dismissal of an earlier suit for redemption of a mortgage does ..... redemption obtaining possession of the property on redemption of the mortgage should hold the same for benefit also of the other co-owners, vide section 90 of the indian trust act. if the suit for redemption prosecution bona fide ends in failure, there is no reason why the decree will not be binding on the other co-owners. explanation vi ..... entitled to redeem ext. al. (3) the transaction evidenced by ext. a1 is a lease and the defendant is entitled to fixity of tenure under the kerala land reforms act.3. the issue relating to fixity of tenurewas referred to the land tribunal undersection 125(3) of the kerala land reforms actand the tribunal returned a finding and (that)the .....