Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air corporations act 1953 repealed chapter v air transport council Page 17 of about 521 results (0.157 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Vittal Shetty Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... following shall be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court than ..... the constitution of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of other statutes ..... upon the judgment of the hon'ble apex court referred to herein below with benefit: delhi transport corporation vs d.t.c.mazdoor congress (air1991sc101= 1990 scr (supl)(1) 142):"122 ..... an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second ..... as is evident from the decision of an enlarged privy council sitting in attorney-general for jersey v holley [2005 ..... . the state of vindhya pradesh, 1953 scr1188 (air1953sc394 the court ..... that: (air p. ..... air ..... ..... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

N B Pooviah Vs. The State Of Karanataka

Court : Karnataka

..... following shall be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court than ..... the constitution of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of other statutes ..... upon the judgment of the hon'ble apex court referred to herein below with benefit: delhi transport corporation vs d.t.c.mazdoor congress (air1991sc101= 1990 scr (supl)(1) 142):"122 ..... an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second ..... as is evident from the decision of an enlarged privy council sitting in attorney-general for jersey v holley [2005 ..... . the state of vindhya pradesh, 1953 scr1188 (air1953sc394 the court ..... that: (air p. ..... air ..... ..... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri V G Siddhartha Hegde Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... following shall be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court than ..... the constitution of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of other statutes ..... upon the judgment of the hon'ble apex court referred to herein below with benefit: delhi transport corporation vs d.t.c.mazdoor congress (air1991sc101= 1990 scr (supl)(1) 142):"122 ..... an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second ..... as is evident from the decision of an enlarged privy council sitting in attorney-general for jersey v holley [2005 ..... . the state of vindhya pradesh, 1953 scr1188 (air1953sc394 the court ..... that: (air p. ..... air ..... ..... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Shadakshari Vs. The Assistante Executive Engineer

Court : Karnataka

..... following shall be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court than ..... the constitution of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of other statutes ..... upon the judgment of the hon'ble apex court referred to herein below with benefit: delhi transport corporation vs d.t.c.mazdoor congress (air1991sc101= 1990 scr (supl)(1) 142):"122 ..... an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second ..... as is evident from the decision of an enlarged privy council sitting in attorney-general for jersey v holley [2005 ..... . the state of vindhya pradesh, 1953 scr1188 (air1953sc394 the court ..... that: (air p. ..... air ..... ..... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri B S Patil Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... following shall be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court than ..... the constitution of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of other statutes ..... upon the judgment of the hon'ble apex court referred to herein below with benefit: delhi transport corporation vs d.t.c.mazdoor congress (air1991sc101= 1990 scr (supl)(1) 142):"122 ..... an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second ..... as is evident from the decision of an enlarged privy council sitting in attorney-general for jersey v holley [2005 ..... . the state of vindhya pradesh, 1953 scr1188 (air1953sc394 the court ..... that: (air p. ..... air ..... ..... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Santosh A Shetty Vs. The State Of Karantaka

Court : Karnataka

..... following shall be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court than ..... the constitution of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of other statutes ..... upon the judgment of the hon'ble apex court referred to herein below with benefit: delhi transport corporation vs d.t.c.mazdoor congress (air1991sc101= 1990 scr (supl)(1) 142):"122 ..... an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second ..... as is evident from the decision of an enlarged privy council sitting in attorney-general for jersey v holley [2005 ..... . the state of vindhya pradesh, 1953 scr1188 (air1953sc394 the court ..... that: (air p. ..... air ..... ..... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mvc Hanumanthaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... following shall be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court than ..... the constitution of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of other statutes ..... upon the judgment of the hon'ble apex court referred to herein below with benefit: delhi transport corporation vs d.t.c.mazdoor congress (air1991sc101= 1990 scr (supl)(1) 142):"122 ..... an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second ..... as is evident from the decision of an enlarged privy council sitting in attorney-general for jersey v holley [2005 ..... . the state of vindhya pradesh, 1953 scr1188 (air1953sc394 the court ..... that: (air p. ..... air ..... ..... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

G Lakshmanappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... following shall be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court than ..... the constitution of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of other statutes ..... upon the judgment of the hon'ble apex court referred to herein below with benefit: delhi transport corporation vs d.t.c.mazdoor congress (air1991sc101= 1990 scr (supl)(1) 142):"122 ..... an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second ..... as is evident from the decision of an enlarged privy council sitting in attorney-general for jersey v holley [2005 ..... . the state of vindhya pradesh, 1953 scr1188 (air1953sc394 the court ..... that: (air p. ..... air ..... ..... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri A Ramaraju Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... following shall be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court than ..... the constitution of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of other statutes ..... upon the judgment of the hon'ble apex court referred to herein below with benefit: delhi transport corporation vs d.t.c.mazdoor congress (air1991sc101= 1990 scr (supl)(1) 142):"122 ..... an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second ..... as is evident from the decision of an enlarged privy council sitting in attorney-general for jersey v holley [2005 ..... . the state of vindhya pradesh, 1953 scr1188 (air1953sc394 the court ..... that: (air p. ..... air ..... ..... .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri K C Mahesha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... following shall be questions of title and substituted, namely- ownership to, or lawful possession of any land (3) all alleged acts of land grabbed under this act grabbing shall be tried and offences specified only by the special court in chapter xiv-a of the constituted for the area in karnataka land which the land is revenue act, 1964, situated, or where there shall be tried only in a are more special courts special court than ..... the constitution of india and section482of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 praying to declare that the proceeding on the record of the special court of the trial of offences under the karnataka land grabbing (prohibision) act, 2011 in petition no.lgc43of2016is annexure-g at page no.227- 270 dated0801.2018 in violation of the underlying statute, in gross violation of article21of the constitution, opposed to extablished laws and in contravention of other statutes ..... upon the judgment of the hon'ble apex court referred to herein below with benefit: delhi transport corporation vs d.t.c.mazdoor congress (air1991sc101= 1990 scr (supl)(1) 142):"122 ..... an act is repealed and the repealing enactment is then repealed by another, which manifests no intention that the original act shall continue repealed, the common law rule was that the repeal of the second ..... as is evident from the decision of an enlarged privy council sitting in attorney-general for jersey v holley [2005 ..... . the state of vindhya pradesh, 1953 scr1188 (air1953sc394 the court ..... that: (air p. ..... air ..... ..... .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //