Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: air corporations act 1953 repealed chapter v air transport council Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 2 results (0.040 seconds)

Apr 28 1992 (HC)

Village Papers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ99HP

..... such amount of bonus, without making this demand before the management, it can be legitimately said, if i may say so with respect, as was said by a bench of this court in the case of the members of the sasamusa workers union, (air) 1952 pat 210, that no dispute had actually cropped up, because no demand was made before the management, there was no refusal of the demand and hence there was no dispute.it may also well be that if a different ..... in shambu nath goyal's case (supra), learned judges also made reference to sindhu resettlement corporation's case (supra) by observing that the question whether in case of apprehended dispute government can make a reference made sub-section (1) of section 10 of the act was not examined by the earlier decision. ..... ' chapter iv of the act deals with the procedure, powers and duties of various authorities under the act, duties of conciliation officers are enumerated in section 12 of the act asunder:' 12. ..... thereafter, the similar view was taken in delhi transport corporation v. ..... sarathy 1953-i-llj-174 where a bench consisting of five (earned judges of the supreme court held that the disputes referred to a tribunal under section 10(1) (c) of the act in order that the resulting award may be binding on any particular industrial establishment and its employees need not have actually arisen between them and the learned judges further held that the contrary .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 1994 (HC)

Mohinder Pal Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1995HP15

..... in which it is understood in the united states of america where property rights are given greater protection than what is required to be done in our country are fulfilled by the act, yet the high court, with respect, grievously erred in holding that even assuming that the provisions of chapter v of the act are protected from challenge under articles 14, 19 and 31 of the constitution due to the applicability of article 31c of the constitution still the impugned provisions of the ..... corporation of madras, air 1932 mad 474, it has been held that when a definition 'includes' certain things, it should be taken that the legislature either intended to settle a difference of opinion on the point or wanted to bring in other matters that ..... it was also held that nationalisation of the transport would undoubtedly be a distribution for the common good of the people and would be clearly covered by clause (b) of article ..... the himachal pradesh land revenue act, 1953 does not contain any definition of land, however, it defines 'estate' under section 4(5) in the following terms :--'estate' means any area : (a) for which a separate record-of-rights has been made; or (b) which has been ..... since article 31 of the constitution stands repealed, no grievance can be made by the ..... article is an exact reproduction of repealed article 31(1). ..... by virtue of repeal of clause (f) of article 19(1), no fundamental right to properties is available to the petitioner and the legislation cannot be impugned on that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //