Air 1952 Nag 12 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: air 1952 nag 12 Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 581 results (0.404 seconds)Shri Vasant Mahadev Pandit and anr. Vs. Zaibunnisa Abdul Sattr Dhuru a ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-08-2001
Reported in : 2001(2)ALLMR289; 2001(2)BomCR616; (2001)2BOMLR437; 2001(3)MhLj118
to lead positive evidence and not merely his bare words 12 it is not unknown in our society that brothers and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Bank of India Vs. Ashis Kumar Roy and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-02-2001
Reported in : (2002)2CALLT390(HC)
the basis of affidavits at this stage of the proceeding 12 in my view the learned trial judge acted illegally or
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTaj Electronics Company Vs. Commissioner for Co-operative Enquiries an ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-25-2001
Reported in : 2002(1)ALD171; 2007(6)ALT101
societies act sections 51 52 54 55 55 a 120 128 and 131 of a p co op societies act 1964
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTribhuwan NaraIn Singh Vs. Varanasi Development Authority and ors.
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Feb-27-2001
Reported in : (2001)1UPLBEC859
to the petitioner of flat no l 5 37 shastri nagar varanasi in pursuance of lease deed executed on 15 7 its possession to respondent no 1 vide order dated 16 12 1981 coppy appended as anncxure 4 respondent no 3 however
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamchandra S/O Ukandaji, Died, Through L.Rs. Vs. Agricultural Produce ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-10-2001
Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR850; 2001(3)BomCR85
mehta and sons ltd v century spg mfg com ltd air1962sc1314 held as under the proper test for determining whether a the respondent committee herein had preferred regular civil appeal no 129 1980 before the district court nanded at the hearing of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTQari Mohammed Zakir HussaIn and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Grea ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Oct-06-2001
Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR98
in secretary k s e b trivandrum v m sainaba air1990ker50 17 understood thus what is to be seen is whether c t s no 1582 near milan sub way lohiya nagar vile parle west mumbai 400 050 g pending the hearing the plaintiff under this provision is a sine qua non 12 in the present case though the trial court in its
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaj Breweries Ltd. Vs. Government of India and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jul-10-2001
Reported in : 2001(4)BomCR668; (2003)181CTR(Bom)417; [2003]260ITR220(Bom)
dr ajay upadyay anr 2006 cri lj 4274 2006 5 air bom r held per incuriam having been satisfied that there account of the default made by shaw wallace and company 12 in our view there is much force in the submissions
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDilip Bastimal JaIn Vs. Baban Bhanudas Kamble and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jun-09-2001
Reported in : AIR2002Bom279; 2001(3)ALLMR338; 2001(4)BomCR374; (2002)1BOMLR94; 2001(3)MhLj730
1973 2scr1064 and subsequently followed in vimala ammal s case air1991mad209 thus it was not at all necessary for plaintiff to accordingto the scale prescribed under article i emphasis supplied consideration 12 having heard the parties at length it is necessary to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited Bank of India Vs. Natural Synthetics Products and
Court : DRAT Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-05-2001
that they are not personally liable the decision reported in air 1963 patna 151 is however not to the point the officer below for coming to the conclusion in his judgment 12 there are certain facts which are not in dispute respondent
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDirector General (investigation Vs. Daewoo Motors India Limited and
Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC
Decided on : Aug-23-2001
respondent no 1 which may be referred to in paragraph 12 of the d g i amp r s amended application
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT