Air 1924 Sind 71 - Judgment Search Results

Udai Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1987(2)WLN245

..... the full bench decision of the judicial commissioners sind in mehrab v emperor air 1924 sind 71 that of the punjab high court in fatta v state air 1964 pub 351 and that of the allahabad ..... cal 123 the full bench decision of the judicial commissioners air 1924 sindu 71 and that of punjab high court in fatta v state air 1964 pub 35 which were approved by their lordships .....

A.K. Roy Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1962Cal135,66CWN697

..... full bench decision of the judicial commissioners of sind mehrab v emperor 26 cr lj 181 air 1924 sind 71 fb it would appear that in the assam ..... one decision to the contrary viz state of kutch v budhgar dharangar air 1954 kutch 26 where it was held that the magistrate on ..... court he can present a regular complaint under section 190 in air 1932 pat 72 the following observations appear even when a final .....

L. Muniswamy and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1976CriLJ763

..... initiated by taking cognizance of offence the decision in mehrab v the crown air 1924 sind 71 1925 26 cri lj 181 fb has been approved in this case 7 ..... by him reliance was placed on the decisions in emperor v stewart air 1927 sind 28 1926 27 cri lj 1217 and in pandaran mani v state ..... agree with this view in emperor s case 1926 27 cri lj 1217 sind it has been laid down that the object of section 193 of .....

Saifar and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1962Cal133

..... case mehrab v emperor 26 cri lj 181 air 1924 sind 71 which is a full bench case of the judicial commissioners sind though the case comes from sind the learned judges of the full bench ..... pointing out that in the case which the full bench of the judicial commissioners of sind were considering the evidence had been recorded by the magistrate and on the basis of .....

Chauthmal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1403; 1982()WLN396

..... on a full bench decision of the judicial commissioners sind reported as mehrab v emperor air 1924 sind 71 1925 26 cri lj 181 the division bench held ..... supra and the full bench case of the judicial commissioners of sind mentioned above a division bench of the punjab high court consisting ..... be cited here with advantage is reported in fatta v state air 1964 punj 351 1964 2 cri lj 204 relying on saifar .....

State Vs. Lekh Raj Faqir Chand and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1967P& H35; 1967CriLJ248

..... see in this connection mehrab v the crown air 1924 sind 71 fb and fatta v state 66 pun lr 548 air 1964 punj 351 wherein stress was laid upon ..... similar view was taken in imperator v lalu 1911 12 cri lj 399 sind the correctness of the view taken in sakhia s case 1909 3 ind ..... cas 568 nag supra was questioned in nga chan tha v emperor air 1923 rang 31 fb and the matter was referred to the full bench .....

Fatta and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1964CriLJ204

..... has committed an offence in a full bench case mehrab v the crown air 1924 sind 71 a question similar to the one involved in the present case arose and ..... re 1901 cri and hira lal v emperor 7 pun re 1918 cri air 1918 lab 196 it would thus appear that the case criminal revn no ..... two cases harbir singh v the state air 1952 pepsu 29 and mst ido v gainda singh sobha singh air 1952 pepsu 38 and mr jain too .....

Anupam Chakraborty Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

..... it was further observed that the view taken in air 1924 sind 71 1925 26 cri lj 181 fb mehrab v emperor air 1902 cal 133 1952 1 cri lj 283 saifar ..... mr de the other two decisions placed before me are those reported in air 1907 sc 1167 1967 cri lj 1081 raghubans v state of bihar and ..... v state air 1964 punj 351 1963 2 cri lj 204 .....

Pune Cantonment Board and Another Vs. Bharat Forge Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1998Bom53; 1998(1)BomCR692; (1998)1BOMLR812; 1998(2)MhLj445

allahabad high court in har gopal v cantonment board kanpur air1981all29 the facts in the matter before the allahabad high court no order as to costs 18 petition succeed cantonment act 1924 section 71 expression at any time power to amend assessment list as amended became operative there is nothing in section 71 to suggest that such amendment would not be operative for

Moti Lal Vs. Radhey Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1933All642; 147Ind.Cas.529

in the case reported in hirachand amichand v nemchand fulchand air 1923 bom 403 and by the punjab chief court in are given one is from a letter dated 5th october 1924 in this letter which was sent to mithu lal copal extracts of letters sent by them are noted at p 71 of the paper books extracts from two letters are given