Skip to content


Aggregation - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: aggregation Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 580 results (0.009 seconds)
Sep 20 2006 (HC)

Progressive Constructions Co. and ors. Vs. South Central Railway and o ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-20-2006

Reported in: 2006(6)ALD570

..... nhai authorities and the consultant engineer the petitioner had transported huge quantities of stone aggregates illegally without valid permits issued by the 3rd respondent and evaded crores of seigniorage ..... respondents in demanding payment of seigniorage fee on the quantity of rock sand and aggregates processed mineral supplied when the unprocessed mineral has suffered seigniorage fee prescribed as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 2006 (TRI)

Gujarat Medicraft Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cipla Ltd.

Court: Trademark

Decided on: Jan-31-2006

Reported in: (2006)(32)PTC510Reg

..... final hearing the proceedings inter alia making the simultaneous provisions for one month extension in aggregate to file a notice of opposition evidence in support of opposition evidence in support ..... grant of extension in the opposition proceedings particularly when the extension of one month in aggregate is specifically and expressly provided in the aforesaid rules hence the opponent s contention .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 31 2006 (TRI)

Shri Raghav Bahl Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-31-2006

Reported in: (2008)111ITD174(Delhi)

..... officer for commission paid by the assessee for obtaining accommodation entries aggregating to rs 1 78 20 411 from m s friends ..... machinery regarding computation of the udi according to this sub section aggregate of the total income of the previous year falling within ..... reason is that the assessee had received cheques of substantial amounts aggregating to rs 1 78 20 411 from friends portfolio such .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 27 2006 (HC)

Sardar Gurudas Singh Bedi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-27-2006

Reported in: 2007(2)BomCR504; 2006(33)PTC321(Bom)

..... for registration or within such period not exceeding one month in aggregate which the registrar may grant the petitioner on 3 1 2006 ..... or within such further period not exceeding one month in the aggregate as the registrar on application made to him in the prescribed ..... or within such further period not exceeding one month in the aggregate as the registrar on application made to him in the prescribed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 2006 (TRI)

Nebulae Health Care Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-22-2006

Reported in: (2006)(112)ECC645

..... impugned order is therefore not sustainable 7 the provisions in the relevant notifications to compute aggregate value of clearances mandate that the clearances of goods bearing brand name or trade ..... third parties should be excluded the following explanation inter alia governed computation of the above aggregate value for the notfn explanation iv for the purposes of this notification where the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 2006 (HC)

Laya Binaykumar Pandey Vs. Medical Council of India and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-23-2006

Reported in: 2006(6)MhLj438

..... 20 and practical 20 as regards the candidate obtaining 50 in aggregate with minimum of 50 in theory including orals and minimum ..... in practical clinical iv the student must obtain 50 minimum as aggregate of the above mentioned three heads of passing it is ..... words there is no requirement that the student must secure 50 aggregate in internal assessment as a distinct head internal assessment only requires .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 15 2006 (TRI)

Asstt. Cit Vs. Ranjit Singh Ghuman

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Decided on: Sep-15-2006

..... jewellery fdrs etc were found in case the assessee had received loans aggregating to rs 1 80 95 000 there should have been matching ..... of the revenue was accepted that the assessee had received loans aggregating to rs 1 80 95 000 the assessee would be left ..... unexplained expenditure once the assessing officer has accepted the receipt of loans aggregating to rs 1 80 95 000 on the basis of seized .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 28 2006 (TRI)

Gothi thermoforming Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Sep-28-2006

Reported in: (2007)(114)ECC180

..... clearances from the beginning of the financial year of plastic sheets also in determining the aggregate value of clearances of specified goods for the purpose of the notification accordingly after including ..... the value of clearances of plastic sheets from april 1997 in the aggregate value of clearances of specified goods for the purpose of the notification the authorities .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 27 2006 (TRI)

In Re: Investigation Into Initial

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Apr-27-2006

..... the branch had provided ipo finance of rs 23800 each to 12008 applicants aggregating rs 28 57 crores in the idfc ipo b kelan doshi group the ..... branch had provided ipo finance of rs 23800 each to 2000 applicants aggregating rs 3 41 crores in the idfc ipo c it was seen ..... the branch had provided ipo finance of rs 23800 each to 3118 applicants aggregating rs 7 42 crores in the idfc ipo b it was seen .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 05 2006 (TRI)

Nagendra Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Allahabad

Decided on: Sep-05-2006

Reported in: (2007)(2)SLJ17CAT

..... sc st obc in railway commercial working as well as in the aggregate in the other subjects i e english second language offered by ..... one fixed for general candidates accordingly it is minimum 45 in the aggregate and the applicant had secured only 40 8 the respondents have ..... fit for appointment the difference in marks is just 4 2 in aggregate the minimum of 33 in english is already available and this .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //