Affect - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: affect Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 2,728 results (1.191 seconds)Rex Cinema Co-owners Vs. Sixth Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-13-1981
Reported in: (1983)3ITD633(Mum.)
..... provisions which deal with jurisdiction are substantive 2 certain vested rights of the assessee are affected as far as further and collateral proceedings are concerned like appeals revision and rectification 3 ..... authority 5 developing the second limb of this submission that the provisions of section 144b affected the vested right he submitted that these could not be interfered with unless the statute .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHodel Vs. Virginia Surface Mining
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-15-1981
..... the tenth amendment shields the states from preemptive federal regulation of private activities affecting interstate commerce to the contrary national league of cities explicitly reaffirmed the teaching ..... as its constitutional justification for civil rights legislation certain criminal statutes regulatory measures affecting the sale of foods and additives and a registration law for drug producers .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaryland Vs. Louisiana
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-26-1981
..... exercise of our original jurisdiction are lacking in merit first our original jurisdiction is not affected by the provisions of the eleventh amendment which only withholds federal judicial power in ..... societal changes and the evolution of this court s responsibilities in the american legal system affected the determination of what was an appropriate case in which to exercise original jurisdiction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBall Vs. James
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-29-1981
..... significant influence on flood control and environmental management its policies and actions substantially affect all district residents regardless of property ownership the district court upheld the constitutionality ..... exercises functions that are removed from the core duties of government and disproportionately affect a particular group of citizens that group may exercise more immediate control .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCity of Memphis Vs. Greene
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1981
..... of appeals reversed and remanded holding that the street closing was invalid because it adversely affected respondents ability to hold and enjoy their property the court concluded that relief under 1982 ..... negative psychological consequences of the possible closure of west drive and how those consequences might affect property values and i will ask you to answer that question a well particularly on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Karnataka-i Vs. P. Mahalakshmi and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-14-1981
Reported in: (1982)27CTR(Kar)136; [1982]134ITR428(KAR); [1982]134ITR428(Karn)
..... of the property towards damage sustained by the owners by reason of the acquisition injuriously affecting that property 7 for the relevant assessment year the ito computed the capital gains taking ..... the deputy commissioner s taking possession of the land by reason of the acquisition injuriously affecting his other property movable or immovable in any other manner or his earning fifthly sixthly .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMian Bashir Ahmad and Etc. Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Nov-13-1981
..... chance possibility or speculative thought which may vitiate the law stray misfortunes when laws affecting large chunks of the community are enacted are inevitable and the respondents before us ..... may perhaps belong to that category social legislation without tears affecting vested rights is impossible and statutory construction as a benignant sensitivity 117 the authority .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCity of Milwaukee Vs. Illinois
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-28-1981
..... law were created however in the 1972 amendments congress provided ample opportunity for a state affected by decisions of a neighboring state s permit granting agency to seek redress respondents ..... common law nuisance count in seeking assurances that the pending litigation would not be adversely affect ed senator griffin stated explicitly that the lawsuit was based on two preexisting federal statutes .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRanjit Ram Vs. the Financial Commissioner, Revenue Punjab, Chandigarh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-15-1981
Reported in: AIR1981P& H313
..... enactments mentioned in sub section 1 hereinafter referred to as the said enactments shall be affect i the proceedings for the determination of the surplus area pending immediately before the ..... enactments mentioned in sub section 1 hereinafter referred to as the said enactments shall not affect i the proceedings for the determination of the surplus area pending immediately before the commencement .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrakash Amichand Shah Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-24-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC1597; 1981(3)SCALE1084; (1981)3SCC508; [1982]1SCR81; 1981(13)LC632(SC)
..... paid to the owner of any property or right injuriously affected by the making of a town planning scheme in accordance ..... that clause and taking acquisition of land to mean injurious affection of the land acquired would be inconsistent with the entire ..... by the person interested by reason of the acquisition injuriously affecting his other property the expression person interested as defined in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial