Advocate Act 1961 Section 26 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: advocate act 1961 section 26 Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 541 results (1.197 seconds)Purushottamlal Kaushik Vs. Vidyacharan Shukla
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Sep-05-1980
Reported in : AIR1980MP188; 1980MPLJ644
..... lr 26 ele tribunal rewa on which reliance has been placed by the learned advocate general the tribunal there rightly observed that there was nothing in clause b of section 7 of the act to ..... khagendranath v umesh chandra air 1958 assam 183 affirmed in sarat chandra v khagendranath air 1961 sc 334 udainath singh s case was a decision by election tribunal in which it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Ministry of Finance, New ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-10-1980
Reported in : [1981]128ITR543(Delhi)
..... this appeal is whether the provisions of section 288 4 of the income tax act 1961 act of 1961 which empower the commissioner of income tax ..... has turned are as follows 2 the respondent is an advocate he filed his return of income for the assessment year 1958 ..... income tax commissioner bhopal made an order under section 288 4 of the act on february 26 1971 disqualifying the respondent from representing an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.R. Pandya Vs. Taraben Hansraj AmIn and anr.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Feb-25-1980
Reported in : AIR1981Guj14; (1981)0GLR119
a short adjournment to enable the defendants to engage another advocate when he himself was not in a position to take so in my view when the judge is inclined to act under clause d and when the party applies for time
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Dhiman Kahali Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Sep-25-1980
Reported in : AIR1981Cal1
of the order be handed over to both the learned advocates scrupulously observe those standards on pain of invalidation of an act in violation of them the same view has been reiterated
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadha Raman Sarkar Vs. State of West Bengal
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Mar-05-1980
Reported in : 1980CriLJ1393
appeal by the accused 4 mr anath bandhu pal learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant has stated that the fit case in which the provisions of probation of offenders act should be invoked he sentenced the accused under that section twenty one years of age and the conviction was under section 411 of the indian penal code by applying the provisions
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.B. Risaldar Vs. Radheshyam Ramdhar Agarwal and anr.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jul-03-1980
Reported in : (1980)2GLR136
of the accused and acquitted him miss valikarimwala the learned advocate for the appellant very strongly urged before me that this followed the person who gives instructions has to testify that actual procedure was done in his presence according to his instructions in view for deciding the issue the whole object of section 11 and rule 22 is to find out by a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnjani Prasad and ors. Vs. IshwardIn and ors.
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-08-1980
Reported in : AIR1982MP10
advice of the counsel lal praduman singh a very senior advocate of rewa no specific order was passed on these applications in passing this order the lower appellate court has either acted beyond its jurisdiction of exercised jurisdiction either illegally or with permitted to be done the term decree is defined in section 2 2 of the code of civil procedureto mean the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShripad Shivaram Kulkarni Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-07-1980
Reported in : (1982)2SCC174
the accused along with mr v n ganpule as an advocate nbsp see the judgment reported at 1980 4 scc 491 fact that it was a case under prevention of corruption act and therefore the appeal could not be disposed of as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTribhovandas Kishibhai Patel Vs. Iven Daulal Raubens and anr.
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Sep-15-1980
Reported in : (1983)2GLR1194
the time when he filed written statement 11 the learned advocate shri pandya drew our attention to the fact that the the impairment which he might have in regard to his activities in future and further fact that he might have to when a scooter enters from a bye lane he clearly sections the pedestrians crossing the roads the car in which the a lump sum and for the general chances of life 26 our attention was also drawn to the corpus juris secundum
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: a Letter Dated 2nd/15th Sept. 1980 of Shrikant V. Bhat
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-03-1980
Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR251
in terrorem the second serious comment advanced by the learned advocate general is that there is nothing on the record to the official appraisals of sentences by citizens like all human actions unless clearly in the realm of penal law should be the above conclusion contempt of courts act lxx of 1971 sections 15 1 2 c initiation of proceedings in contempt principles
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT