Advocate Act 1961 Section 26 - Judgment Search Results

Kunti Vs. Returning Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Bagbahara and Others

Court: Chhattisgarh

..... of fact cannot be interfered in the revisional jurisdiction under section 26 2 of the act of 1961 which is almost similar to that provided under section 115 of the code of civil procedure 1908 for ..... has been declared as void 4 on the other hand shri upendranath awasthy learned sr advocate with shri ramakant mishra and ms raksha awasthy appearing for respondent no 2 contended the .....

Sobran Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court: Chhattisgarh

Reported in: 2002(2)MPHT32(CG)

was advised psychiatric examination 6 now dr shukla learned addl advocate general for the state submits that the petitioner is mentally the state government may have made under the indian lunacy act 1912 4 of 1912 8 in view of the aforesaid provides for release of a lunatic pending investigation or trial section 330 cr pc reads as under 330 release of lunatic

Naresh Kumar Khubwani 'alias' Nandu and Anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh ...

Court: Chhattisgarh

Reported in: 2009(5)MPHT44(CG)

order unless it is shown to be perverse learned government advocate for the state non applicant further argued that the law 1 2008 k s priya and one ku meena choudhary active members of an unlawful organisation namely communist party of india charge i have carefully perused the copies of documents under section 173 of the code of criminal procedure filed by the 161 of the code of criminal procedure reveals that on 26 1 2008 police had seized naxalite uniforms from santosh the

Smt. Devki Ganjeer Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Court: Chhattisgarh

grade iii 5 on the other hand shri thakur dy advocate general appearing for the state respondents submits that the education in such matters only if it is shown that the action of the employer is contrary to any constitutional or statutory

V.G. Tamaskar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court: Chhattisgarh

Reported in: AIR2008Chh33

bar council of chhattisgarh having its number as cg330 1982 advocate has filed this review petition 2 to regulate filing of jagdish bhalla actg c j 1 aggrieved by the result and effect of

Shilpa Singh Rajput Vs. Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical Univer ...

Court: Chhattisgarh

swami vivekanand technical university amp others respondents shri ali asgar advocate for the petitioner shri anumeh shrivastava advocate for the responent approach to the problems of this nature isolated from the actual realities and grass root problems involved in the working of four questions for which she has given answers were of 26 marks which have not at all been checked two questions

Heera Sai Ranjit Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh Now State of Chhattisgarh

Court: Chhattisgarh

the contrary shri m p s bhatia learned deputy government advocate for the state respondent supporting the impugned judgment submitted that appellant ranjit was recorded under section 27 of the evidence act on 9 9 1992 and at his instance a danda with utmost circumspection the conviction of the accused appellants under section 304 part ii ipc is based on the testimonies of

Sheela Wakanker and Others Vs. Meena Kumari Sharma and Another

Court: Chhattisgarh

Reported in: 2012AIR(NOC)219

the contention raised by mr h b agrawal learned senior advocate for the appellants it would be appropriate to refer the on the ground that under article 54 of the limitation act the suit ought to have been filed within a period oral judgment 19 01 2012 second appeal under section 100 of the civil procedure code 1908 1 heard on

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sadhu Sharan and ors.

Court: Chhattisgarh

Reported in: I(2007)ACC826; 2006ACJ2439

has filed the instant appeal 2 mr prashant jaiswal senior advocate for the appellant insurance company submitted that case of appellant 37 of 2003 under section 166 of the motor vehicles act 1988 and third additional motor accidents claims tribunal f t prakash then filed claim case no 37 of 2003 under section 166 of the motor vehicles act 1988 and third additional

Chhattisgarh Rajya Abhibhavak Sangh and ors. Vs. Union of India and or ...

Court: Chhattisgarh

Reported in: 2002(1)MPHT24(CG)

2 during the course of the arguments the learned dy advocate general appearing for the state of m p made uncalled notification under section 66 of the m p re organisation act 9 learned counsel for the state of m p states union of india central government may also issue notification under section 66 of the m p re organisation act 9 learned