Adjoining - Judgment Search Results

Abdul Jalil Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

..... pre emption applications claiming reconveyance of the lands in question by virtue of being an adjoining raiyat the two applications were allowed by a common order dated 20 3 1997 annexure ..... hesitation in rejecting the pre emption applications because the purchasers can themselves claim to be adjoining raiyat in the two applications the division bench did observe that perhaps the matter would .....

Bhadreswar Bera Vs. Mathura Mohan Shaw and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2004(4)CHN349

..... pre emptor having admitted that he is in possession of the adjoining plots by virtue of mutual arrangement with his brother in view ..... pre emptor must prove that he is holding a particular portion adjoining the plot acquired by the pre emptee it would be sufficient ..... that he is in actual possession of the portion of the adjoining plot which is immediately contiguous to the land transferred by the .....

Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad and ors. Vs. Gopi Bai and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(2)ALD445; 2004(2)ALT773

..... which reads as follows f prohibited area or regulated area means an area near or adjoining a protected monument which the central government has by notification in the official gazette ..... of national importance the central government can by single notification declare certain area near or adjoining the monument as prohibited or protected areas accordingly a notification was published in gazette dated .....

Tapan Krishna Das Vs. Hazi Sajjad Ali Khan and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2005Cal60,2004(4)CHN511

..... position of law was that the pre emptors who were holding adjoining land were transferred are not entitled to pre empt unless and ..... until the possession of this specific portion of this adjoining land is demarcated but by virtue of such judgment having binding ..... intention of the legislature four months period is a scope to adjoining plot holder having priority to purchase if the time is .....

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC4016; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)353; (2004)3CompLJ199(SC); JT2004(4)SC181; 2004(3)SCALE396; (2004)12SCC118

..... of nct delhi and faridabad and ballabhgarh municipal corporation area and gurgaon town and adjoining industrial area in august 2000 october 1998 and december 2000 respectively mainly on ..... profits which has resulted in number of fatal accidents involving labourers hazards to the adjoining population indiscriminate scattering of the over burden wasteful manner of mining with complete disregard .....

Jammu Fruit Association Vs. J.D.a and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2004(3)JKJ418

..... respondent 2 in exercise of his own discretion allotted a shop site adjoining to shop no 20 without the involvement of the administration as ..... and made the allotment of strip of land in his favour adjoining to the shop site no 20 phase i fruit market complex ..... the administrative action in making the allotment of the shop site adjoining to shop no 20 phase i fruit market complex to respondent .....

The Chairman, Blde Association Vs. Kasturibai and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2004(7)KarLJ100

..... bijapur taluk are located on the outskirts of the municipal limits of bijapur adjoining the lands in r s nos 105 and 106 about n h ..... are out of the approved layout as at ex p 10 and located adjoining the lands in question abutting n h 13 these sale transactions are ..... value of the acquired lands 36 the lands in s no 105 2 adjoining the acquired lands abutting n h 13 are converted to non agricultural .....

Utpal Kumar Sarkar and anr. Vs. Deputy Superintending Archaeologist, A ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2005(1)CHN36

..... 100 meters from the protected limits and further beyond it upto 200 meters near or adjoining protected monuments to be prohibited and regulated areas respectively for the purposes of both mining ..... meters from the protected limits and further beyond it up to 200 meters near or adjoining protected monuments to be prohibited and regulated areas respectively for purposes of both mining operation .....

Shri Ashok Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 111(2004)DLT230; 2004(74)DRJ144

..... or any remains thereof and includes a such portions of land adjoining the site of an ancient monument as may be required for ..... f prohibited area or regulated area means an area near or adjoining a protected monument which the central government has by notification in ..... prohibited or regulated area 1 before declaring an area near or adjoining a protected monument to be a prohibited area or a regulated .....

Laxmi Narayan and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2005(2)Raj1217; 2005(1)WLC643

..... even denied the existence of the field of om prakash kalal adjoining to their field the witness has specifically stated that their field ..... has denied the existence of the field of om prakash kalal adjoining to their field he has specifically deposed that they were in ..... ex p4 indicates that field of om prakash kalai is situated adjoining to the field of corhplainant party that apart from the statement .....