Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2004(6)ALD484; 2004(6)ALT734
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. All the petitioners in these writ petitions are residents of Gadwal Town. They are aggrieved by the proceedings of the first respondent dated 10.8.1999 whereby and whereunder the allotment of LIG/MIG plots made in favour of the petitioners sometime back were cancelled and a proposal to reauction the plots was mooted. As the background facts and the contentious issues are same, it is expedient to dispose of the writ petitions by this common order.2. With a view to improve infrastructure and facilities and to check migration from rural areas, small and medium towns to bigger towns, the Central Government sponsored Integrated Development of Small and Medium Towns (IDSMT) Scheme in 6th Five year plan in 1979-1980. The Scheme envisages development of land with all facilities fit for construction of houses and also payment of grant by the Central Government. In pursuance thereof, the first respondent Municipality took up IDSMT Scheme in Gadwal Town and invited applicati...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj517
Prakash Tatia, J.1. The State Government opened various routes for plying buses of Rapid Transport System vide notification dated 4.11.2006. The State Government further vide another notification dated 12.12.2006 granted approval of the State Government for implementation of Bus Rapid Transport System (for short BRTS) in the cities of Udaipur, Jodhpur and Kota in Rajasthan. By the same order dated 12.12.2006, the State further granted approval for constitution of Special Bus Vehicles (SPV) - a city level transport company for each of the above cities with the Names (1) 'Udaipur City Transport Services Limited' for the city of Udaipur, (2) 'Jodhpur City Transport Services Limited' for the city of Jodhpur and (3) 'Kota City Transport Services Limited' for the city of Kota. The above four writ petitions have been filed to challenge these notifications opening routes for BRTS and against the grant of approval for implementation of BRTS as well as against grant of approval for constitution ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
Reported in : 2002(II)OLR120
B. Panigrahi, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the State challenging the order dated 16.11.1983 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Puri in Sessions Trial No. 3/70 of 1983/82, whereby and whereunder the learned trial Court has acquitted the present respondents along with other accused persons of the charges under Sections 147, 148 and 302/323 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, in short, 'IPC'.2. The skeletal picture of the prosecution case as revealed in course of trial is as follows :There was a club in village Raigurupur in the name and style of 'Gopinath Dev Juba Shree Club'. Prafulla Chandra Panda, P.W.19, was the President, whereas respondent Iswar Mallick was the Secretary of the said club at the relevant time. The respondent Iswar Mallick is alleged to have taken a coconut garden on lease for the year 1982-83 on behalf of the club. About a week after the auction, when the other members of the club attempted to pluck coconuts, Iswar Mallick did not permit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION Nos.6814 of 2009 and Batch 22-01-2013 MD.AMMANUALLAH GHOURI THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD & OTHERS. GIST HEAD NOTE: Counsel for Petitioner: Sri N.V.Sumanth Counsel for Respondent: Learned Advocate General ?CASES REFERRED:1. AIR 196.SC 154.2 AIR 196.SC 110.3 1974 (1) SCC 59.4 1977 (2) SCC 45.5 1977 (3) SCC 9.6 1978 (2) SCC 14.7 AIR 198.SC 48.8 AIR 196.SC 104.9 AIR 196.SC 117.10 (2002) 2 SCC 67.11 (1997) 1 SCC 37.12 2003 (3) SCC 5.13 AIR 199.SC 8.14 AIR 199.SC 178.15 AIR 195.SC 25.16 AIR 199.SC 175.17 AIR 197.SC 133.18 2003 (3) SCC 32.19 2008 (7) SCC 73.20 2008 (7) SCC 74.21 AIR 195.SC 34.22 [1956] 1 All ER 85.23 2007 (5) SCC 21.24 (1991) 4 SC25. (1985) 3 SCC 26.26 AIR 198.SC 110.: (1987) 2 SCC 29.27 (2009) 6 SCC 17.28 (2000) 8 SCC 60.29 (2006) 13 SCC 38.30 2010 (3) ALD 50.(DB20...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
ORDER1. The petitioners have made the following prayers: -W.P.Nos.21314-324 Of 2010"Wherefore the petitioners pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus to respondents 1 to 4 to consider and dispose off their applications as well as representations in Annexure-A. as expeditiously as possible but within a time li.iut. in implementation of IDSMT Scheme and to grant such other relief on the lines indicated by this Hon'ble Court in order dated. 07.10.2010 in W.P.No. 12923 of 2010 (in Annexure-D) and connected matters and to grant such other relief in the interest of justice." W.P.NOS.20969-2102S Sr. 21716 OF 2010 Wherefore the petitioners pray that this Hon'ble Court mag be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus to respondents 1 to 4 to consider and dispose off their applications as expeditiously as possible but within a time limit, in inq. Aementa.uon of IDSMT Scheme and to grant such other relief on the lines indicated by this Hon'ble Court in order, dated 27.11...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2000(6)ALD666; 2000(6)ALT641
ORDER1. The petitioner is the Secretary of Sri Vinayaka Varapu Santha Vyaparasthula Sangam, Mandapalli. According to the petitioner, the sangham consists of 60 members who are all petty businessmen doing business by running vegetable shops, kirana shops, coconut shops etc., in the weekly santha (market) at Madanapalli, in an extent of 5-50 cents of land belonging to the Mandapalli Municipality, for the past several years. Every year, the Municipality conducts public auction of the right to conduct santha and the 2nd respondent was declared as the highest bidder for the present year. The members of the petitioner-Sangham have been paying the fees regularly to the 2nd respondent-contractor. Petitioner claims that the weekly market covers about 600 villages and roughly ten thousand people will attend the santha. The complaint of the petitioner is that without issuing any notice and without observing principles of natural justice, in the first week of September, 1999, the personnel belongi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2001(1)ALT183
N.V. Ramana, J. 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the allotment of shop No.1 of 'B' block at daily vegetable market at Kamareddy by the Municipality, in favour of the fourth respondent, by its resolution No. 1 /2, dated 31.5.1999. 2. The case of the petitioner is that he has erected a wooden bunk at the municipal vegetable market, Kamareddy, and was doing business along with 72 other persons similarly situated. It appears that all these 72 bunk owners are evicted/displaced for the purpose of constructing municipal shopping complex. The municipality passed the following resolution No. 2/74 (II) dated 28.9.1991 before shifting the 72 bunk owners: 'The 72 bunk owners in daily vegetable market should shift their bunks to weekly market temporarily on the condition that the said 72 bunk owners would be allotted shop rooms giving due importance on the rents fixed by the municipal council at 2that time. A list of 72 vendors is also enclosed to the resolution'.3. Afte...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.8797 OF 200.& O.J.C. No.6721 OF 199.In the matter of applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. _______ In W.P.(C) No.8797 OF 200.Tapan Kumar Das Petitioner -versusCommissioner, Cuttack Municipal Corporation, and others Opp. Parties For Petitioner : Shri G.A.R. Dora, Senior Advocate, Smt.G.Rani Dora & Shri J.K. Lenka, Advocates Shri P. R. Dash (Amicus Curiae) For Opp.Parties : Shri Sisir Das, Addl. Govt. Advocate (O.Ps 2 & 5), Shri Pradipta Mohanty (O.P. 1), Shri Dayananda Mohapatra (O.P. 4), Shri J.Patnaik, Sr. Advocate, Shri B. Mohanty (O.Ps.3 &6) and Shri P.K.Rath (O.P.7), Advocates. _________ In O.J.C. No.6721 of 1999 Shri Prasant Kumar Das Petitioner -versusThe State of Orissa & others For Petitioner : For Opp.Parties : Opp. Parties Shri P. R. Dash, ( Amicus Curiae ) Shri Sisir Das, Addl. Govt. Advocate, Shri S. K. Nayak, Sr. Advocate, Shri Dayananda Mohapatra, Shri G. P. Mohanty & Shri K. N. Jena, Advocates _...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.8797 OF 200.& O.J.C. No.6721 OF 199.In the matter of applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. _______ In W.P.(C) No.8797 OF 200.Tapan Kumar Das Petitioner -versusCommissioner, Cuttack Municipal Corporation, and others Opp. Parties For Petitioner : Shri G.A.R. Dora, Senior Advocate, Smt.G.Rani Dora & Shri J.K. Lenka, Advocates Shri P. R. Dash (Amicus Curiae) For Opp.Parties : Shri Sisir Das, Addl. Govt. Advocate (O.Ps 2 & 5), Shri Pradipta Mohanty (O.P. 1), Shri Dayananda Mohapatra (O.P. 4), Shri J.Patnaik, Sr. Advocate, Shri B. Mohanty (O.Ps.3 &6) and Shri P.K.Rath (O.P.7), Advocates. _________ In O.J.C. No.6721 of 1999 Shri Prasant Kumar Das Petitioner -versusThe State of Orissa & others For Petitioner : For Opp.Parties : Opp. Parties Shri P. R. Dash, ( Amicus Curiae ) Shri Sisir Das, Addl. Govt. Advocate, Shri S. K. Nayak, Sr. Advocate, Shri Dayananda Mohapatra, Shri G. P. Mohanty & Shri K. N. Jena, Advocates _...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
:: 1 :: Writ Petition No.8148/2012. 24.2.2014. Shri Pranay Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sudesh Verma, learned Government Advocate for the State of M.P.on advance notice. Heard on admission. Petitioner seeks quashment of resolution dated 19.12.2011; whereby, Nagar Palika Parishad Khurai, in its special meeting, resolved to appoint Public Health and Engineering Department as the implementing agency for implementing the Central Govt. Scheme for supply of water and discharge of waste. Urban Infrastructure Development Scheme for Small and Medium Towns (UIDSSMT) is a scheme for development of small and medium category of townships. The scheme is sanctioned by State Level Approval Committee followed by approval of the Directorate of Urban Administration and Development Department circulated vide Letter No.F-1-01/2007/18-2 dated 11.1.2007. The scheme provides for that upon its approval, the local authority is to fix the agency for its implementation. In the case at hand, the...
Tag this Judgment!