Actor - Judgment Search Results

Swiss National Ins. Co., Ltd. Vs. Miller

Court: US Supreme Court

swiss national ins co ltd v miller 267 u s 42 1925 u s supreme court swiss national ins co...

Behn, Meyer and Co., Ltd. Vs. Miller

Court: US Supreme Court

behn meyer co ltd v miller 266 u s 457 1925 u s supreme court behn meyer co ltd v...

Jorina Aktar Khatun Vs. HafezuddIn Khan and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1926Cal242,90Ind.Cas.633

ewart greaves j 1 defendant no 1 in the suit appeals against a decision of the subordinate judge of mymensingh...

Aziz Banu Vs. Mohammad Ibrahim Husain

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1925All720

sulaiman j 1 this is an appeal by defendant no 1 arising out of a suit for restitution of conjugal...

Aziz Bano Vs. Mohammad Ibrahim Husain

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 89Ind.Cas.690

sulaiman j 1 this is an appeal by defendant no 1 arising out of a suit for restitution of conjugal...

Sahu Raghunath Singh and ors. Vs. Mahabir Prasad

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1925All439; 87Ind.Cas.558

piggott j 1 this suit arises out of an attempt made by the defendant who is the zamindar of a...

Channu Dutta Vyas Vs. Swami Gyannandji Maharaj

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1926All130; 90Ind.Cas.976

..... does nothing more than prove that as a result of the actors being allowed to sleep in the garden precincts various episodes have ..... did nothing more than prove that as a result of the actors being allowed to sleep in the garden precincts various episodes used ..... in the garden precincts if his intention was to hold that the actors were allowed to enter the garden under some express permission granted .....

H.W. Smith Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 91Ind.Cas.889

..... but with the hope that they will not and often with the belief that the actor has taken sufficient precautions to prevent their happening the imputability arises from acting despite the ..... the illegal and mischievous effect will follow but in circum stances which show that the actor has not exercised the caution incumbent upon him and that if he had he would .....

New York Central R. Co. Vs. Chisolm

Court: US Supreme Court

..... act is done for another jurisdiction if it should happen to lay hold of the actor to treat him according to its page 268 u s 32 own notions rather than .....

Emperor Vs. Supadi Lukadu

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1925)27BOMLR604

..... that the illegal and mischievous effect will follow but in circumstances which show that the actor has not exercised the caution incumbent upon him and that if he had he would .....