Actions - Judgment Search Results

M.P. Purusothaman and ors. Vs. Assistant Director of Income-tax (Prose ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2001]252ITR603(Mad)

r jayasimha babu j 1 it is counsel s contention that under section 279 2 of the income tax act...

The Consumer Action Group and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC3060; 2000(4)CTC181; JT2000(9)SC272; 2000(6)SCALE1; (2000)7SCC425; [2000]Supp2SCR523

..... completion the chennai metropolitan development authority has booked five thousand structures on which demolition action could be taken number of such cases booked by the chennai city municipal corporation ..... chennai city municipal corporation could book only one thousand such buildings against which demolition action could be taken d administratively also demolition of such a large number of cases .....

Maharishi Vidya Mandir Guardian's Action Committee and anr. Vs. State ...

Court: Guwahati

..... v m guwahati 3 2 representation memorandum was filed by the guardian action committee on 6 4 2000 and 10 4 2000 but nothing was ..... the school in case of such malpractices the board may take drastic action leading to disaffiliation of the school 3 the unaided schools should consult ..... the writ application has been filed by the guardian action committee represented by its co ordinator shri rajen sarma they .....

Indian Council for Envirolegal Action and ors. Vs. Union of India and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1999(10)SC327; 2000(3)SCALE415a

..... i to the above report so that this court can take necessary action in regard to the defaulting industries 4 the board shall also file ..... has been incorporated as a 0 medium term measure in the joint action plan which was taken note of by this court in its order ..... to the above report that the board has taken certain actions in regard to the industries mentioned in the said annexure and remedial .....

Indian Council for Enviro Legal Action Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and or ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(5)SCALE286

..... is likely to be submitted shortly as per this joint revised action plan the entire scheme would be completed by august 2002 3 ..... industries bring their waste to the permissible norms as per joint action plan so far as the aforesaid 85 industries referred in annexure ..... next date of hearing this is important since the proposed joint action specifies fixed time frame for completing it any delay on behalf .....

Consumer Action Group Vs. Cadbury India Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(4)ALT25(SC); JT2000(2)SC5; (2000)9SCC56

orderdr a s anand c j 1 the appellant consumer action group filed a complaint being st no 55 90 in

Maharishi Vidya Mandir Guardian's Action Committee and anr. Vs. State ...

Court: Guwahati

..... v m guwahati 3 2 representation memorandum was filed by the guardian action committee on 6 4 2000 and 10 4 2000 but nothing was ..... the school in case of such malpractices the board may take drastic action leading to disaffiliation of the school 3 the unaided schools should consult ..... 1 the writ application has been filed by the guardian action committee represented by its co ordinator shri rajen sarma .....

Indian Council for Enviro-legal Action and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uo ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(2)SC668; 2000(3)SCALE415

..... in secured land fills within 30 days from the date of the notice unfortunately no action is taken pursuant to the notice petl at patancherun and the member industries of petl .....

Khar Pattu and ors. Vs. State

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2000CriLJ2827

to hari ram on their side deceased accused therefore the action on the part of accused appellants was simply in the

United States Vs. Morrison

Court: US Supreme Court

..... assumptions congress concluded that these discriminatory stereotypes often result in insufficient investigation and prosecution of gendermotivated crime inappropriate focus on the behavior and credibility of the victims ..... the conclusion that congress could punis h all conspiracies with or without state action that interfere with fourteenth amendment rights id at 762 concurring opinion justice harlan .....