Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: accident Court: uttaranchal Page 5 of about 710 results (0.008 seconds)

Apr 04 2005 (HC)

Smt. Savitri Devi and ors. Vs. Jot Singh and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1473(UHC)

..... 2 as well as the report dated 24th november, 1991, under section 240/424/304, it is fully evident that the accident had occurred on the said date and deepak singh rana received grievous injuries as will appear from the post-mortem report. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 16 2004 (HC)

Rizwana and ors. Vs. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge U.S ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC192

..... this is an appeal under section 173 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 against the judgment and order dated 20.8.2003 passed by the motor accident claims tribunal/district judge, udham singh nagar in m.a.c.t. ..... atique ahmad deceased met with a motor vehicle accident and a claim petition was preferred by his heirs, the appellants. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2005 (HC)

Deepak Garg and anr. Vs. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : II(2006)ACC586

..... office and shall file an application before the motor accident claims tribunal, who shall pass an appropriate order after taking into consideration, the entire evidence on record. ..... 2 sri dinesh kumar died on account of the accident took place on 14th april, 2002 with a vikram (three wheeler) having registration no. u.p. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 30 2005 (HC)

Uttaranchal Sikh Federation and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : I(2006)ACC306; AIR2006Utr67

..... it aims at prevention of any fatal accident to the driver and the pillion rider of a two wheeler vehicle causing annoyance to the public and obstruction to the free flow of traffic. ..... it aims at prevention of any accident being fatal to the driver of a two-wheeler vehicle causing annoyance to the public and obstruction to the free flow of traffic for the time being. ..... on the contrary, in our opinion, it helps the driver of a two wheeler vehicle to drive the vehicle in exercise of his freedom of movement without being subjected to a constant apprehension of a fatal head injury, if any accident takes place. ..... rule 498-a ensures protection and safety to the head of the driver of a two-wheeler vehicle in case of an accident. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2006 (HC)

Pradeep Negi Vs. Uttaranchal State Road Transport Corporation

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2007ACJ1559

..... the claims tribunal, on the evidence led by the parties, found that claimant pradeep negi suffered multiple injuries in the accident which took place on 16.11.2004; that the injuries suffered by the claimant in the accident led to amputation of his left leg; that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of the offending vehicle bus bearing registration no. ..... 54,00,000 (rupees fifty-four lakh) for the injuries suffered by him in the motor accident on 16.11.2004 when the bus bearing registration no. ..... respondent uttaranchal state road transport corporation contested the claim denying the manner of the accident alleged in the claim petition.5. ..... this is the claimant's appeal for enhancement of the compensation awarded by motor accidents claims tribunal/addl. ..... district judge (second fast track court), nainital vide award dated 10.2.2006 passed in motor accident claim case no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2006 (HC)

S.K. Srivastava and Etc. Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2007Utr52

..... which is a composite law for levy and collection of all the taxes on motor vehicles, was enacted with a view to rationalize taxes on motor vehicles and streamline the administration thereof and to establish the road transport accident relief funds so as to provide relief to the passengers or other persons suffering from casualty in the accidents in which public service vehicles are involved. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 2005 (HC)

Uttaranchal Transport Corporation Vs. Janki Dhanik and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 3(2005)ACC541

..... before the tribunal, appellant-uttaranchal transport corporation, contested the claim petition, alleging that accident did not take place due to the negligence on the part of its driver rather it is alleged that another vehicle was coming from the opposite direction and to save the said vehicle, the bus fell ..... this appeal, preferred under section 173 of the motor vehicles act, 1988, is directed against the judgment and award dated 31.1.2005, passed by motor accident claims tribunal/additional district judge (fast track court), haldwani, district nainital, whereby rs. ..... it is also admitted that in the impugned accident, shri sanjay dhanik died. ..... however, death of shri sanjay dhanik in the accident is not denied by the appellant. ..... the accident is not disputed in this case. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2005 (HC)

Devi Dutt and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1748

..... counsel for the appellants has suggested to gopal singh pw-1 and dharma devi pw-2 that the bullock cart in which ramesh singh, deceased, injured and other persons were travelling after the incident was involved in an accident as a result ramesh singh received the injuries on his head and ultimately he died on account of injuries. ..... dharma devi pw-2 had stated in her cross-examination that bullock cart in which she was travelling with the other persons met an accident with the truck. ..... she had categorically denied the fact that after the incident they had fallen down from the cart and ramesh singh was injured in that accident. dr. l.d. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 2005 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Kusumlata and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1378(UHC); (2005)IILLJ1135UC

..... 1 that on 23rd december, 2002, the jeep met with an accident of which sri kamal singh was the owner and the deceased was driving and he was in the employment of sri kamal singh.17. ..... 1, a finding was recorded that the accident had taken place on 23rd december, 2002, in the written statement as it has come in the evidence that the deceased was only a driver and the vehicle belonged to kamal singh defendant no. 2.14. ..... 08-5216, who was the owner of the said vehicle, met with an accident and died on the spot.9. ..... 08-5216 on the date of accident, which he had purchased from respondent no. ..... on the relevant date, when the accident took place, i.e. ..... at the time of accident, he was aged about 27 years and was getting a salary of rs. ..... 2,70,032 as compensation as the deceased was aged about 28 years at the time of accident.20. ..... accident had taken place of the jeep, which was being driven by basudev singh due to which basudev singh died on the spot. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 2009 (HC)

Ram Bahadur and anr. Vs. Sharda Leesa Factory Jawahar Jyoti

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2009)IIILLJ645UC

..... the learned commissioner has discussed the evidence of ram bahadur father of deceased thakur das, who has deposed in his statement' that his son died due to accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, but the letter which was sent by the father of the deceased to chief minister claiming for. ..... according to the claimants thakur das died on august 20, 2002 due to the accident occurred on august 18, 2002 while he was working under the employment of the respondent. ..... section 3(1) of the workmen's compensation act reads that 'the accident or the death should arise out of and in the course of the employment. ..... it is also to be, considered as to whether the deceased died due to accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.10. ..... electrical, which is at a distance of about 400 paces from the factory and on the date of accident the factory informed r.k. ..... at the time of the accident thakur das was 21 years of age and he was being paid rs. ..... deceased was engaged in any such capacity as specified in schedule-ii of the workmen's compensation act, 1923 for carrying out the work of the employer and as to whether the deceased was a workman on the day/year of his accident. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //