Abolition Of Cash Grants Act 1967 15 Of 1967 - Judgment Search Results

Rang Rao Ram Rao Deshpande and ors. Vs. the State of Mysore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1972Kant98; AIR1972Mys98

..... of the provisions of the mysore abolition of cash grants act 1967 hereinafter referred to as the act arises for determination ah these petitioners were setting cash grants called rusum deshpandyagiri from the ..... 1 sardeshmukhs 2 sardeshpandyas 3 deshmukhs 4 deshpandays 5 dastbandars including mirasl dastbandars 15 mr manohar rao jagirdar learned counsel for the petitioners inthese petitions except .....

State of Gujarat Vs. Girjorirao Ramchandrarao

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1969(I)LC89(SC)

iii x x x x the respondent claimed compensation for abolition of the cash grant under section 15 1 i of shall be paid i seven times the amount of the cash allowance or of the value of the allowance in kind shah j 1 ganpatrao ancestor of the respondent was granted in or about 1806 a d a cash allowance of of bombay enacted the bombay merged territories miscellaneous alienations abolition act 22 of 1955 to abolish the miscellaneous alienations prevailing in deemed to have been abolished ii x x x section 15 provides for the determination of compensation in lieu of alienations

Jahed NaziruddIn S/O ZaheeruddIn and Others Vs. the State of Maharasht ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

the said land under section 2 a of the hyderabad abolition of inams and cash grants act 1954 being community service covered by the application of hyderabad abolition of inams and cash grants act 1954 the succession of the service inam lands 2 a of the hyderabad abolition of inams and cash grants act 1954 reads thus 2 a 2 whether any 28 p 266 para 605 the policy of the limitation acts is laid down as follows the courts have expressed the liberty granted by the high court by order dated 15 09 2003 passed in writ petition no 3565 of 1998

Rama Son of Dashrath and ors. Vs. NuruddIn Son of Kazi NasiruddIn and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR513

petitioner that on coming into force of the hyderabad inams abolition act they come to be recognised as occupants of survey coming into force of the hyderabad abolition of inams and cash grants act 1954 hereinafter will be referred to as the into force of the hyderabad abolition of inams and cash grants act 1954 hereinafter will be referred to as the hyderabad result thereof even if this point first because what the act has abolished is not the inam wholesale but only some going into the question of nature and character of inam 15 it is true that after the decision of the learned

Chandra Prakash JaIn and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1985All362

..... state government while disposing of a statutory appeal under hyderabad abolition of inamsand cash grants act did not record reasons the supreme court did not ..... hearing 7 in state of assam v gauhati municipal board air 1967 sc 1398 the state after considering explanation of the board ..... remand was just and appropriate in the circumstances of the case 15 in the result the writ petition has no force it .....

K.P.Abdul Azeez Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education

Court : Kerala

the third respondent and the central board of secondary education grants affiliation to the third respondent s school it is not taliparamba which the petitioner received under the right to information act dated 13 3 2012 ext p9 photostat copy of the photostat copy of the communication issued by 2nd respondent dated 15 1 2007 ext p4 true copy of the certificate issued

Shri Abdul Shakoor, Son of Shri Farzand Ali Khan Vs. Deputy Director o ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(3)AWC2668

also stated that petitioner was in possession since before zamindari abolition by virtue of power of attorney executed by noor vikram objections regarding the said ijazatnama 5 no relief can be granted to the petitioner in respect of plots of the first section 198 4 of u p z a l r act consolidation authorities cannot cancel patta on these grounds consolidation authorities the previous zamindar in favour of the petitioner bearing date 15 7 1938 was also filed 3 consolidation officer bijnore by

T.V. Krishna Vs. the Nizam's Institute of Medical Science

Court : Andhra Pradesh

reason or the other in such a background where the abolition of the posts on the ground of non receipt of of the posts on the ground of non receipt of grants is not justified it would be appropriate to set aside the face of scanty material to decide whether the government acted honestly in creating a post or refusing to crate a order abolishing posts of two aees and grant consequential reliefs 15 the learned senior counsel for the second petitioner contended that

S. Gangaiah and Othe Vs. State of Telangana, Rep. by Its Principa

Court : Andhra Pradesh

v afzulpurkar writ petition nos 31174 of 2014 and batch 15 12 2014 s gangaiah and others petitioners state of telangana

Guru Nanak Educational Society, a Society Registered Under the Provisi ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(3)BomCR374; (2007)109BOMLR2011; 2007(6)MhLj355

the learned government pleader submitted that ordinarily when the aicte grants approval the state government or the universities may not have duties under sections 82 and 83 of the maharashtra universities act the only limitation on performance of such duties would be not unreasonably delay consideration of grant of permission or affiliation 15 in these petitions the state has not been able to