2019 17 Scc4611 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 2019 17 scc4611 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.914 seconds)Commissioner, Customs Central Excise And Service Tax, Patna Vs. M/s. S ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
..... to nbcc not directly to iit patna iit9 2018 9 scc110 2019 17 scc4611 patna has engaged nbcc as a project management consultant making ..... under article 243w of the constitution is entrusted to discharge 17 we have no hesitation to disagree with the latter interpretation ..... court in kantaru rajeevaru vs indian young lawyers association ors 17 that when a provision is carefully punctuated and there is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTarachand Hirachand Porwal Vs. Durappa Tavanappa Patravali
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : AIR1943Bom237; (1943)45BOMLR470
court in that case held that the amendment to section 17 in 1935 had made the whole section clear and removed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Avon Automobiles, Arya Girls School Street , Arya Samaj Road, Sirs ...
Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
judgments i noor ali vs national insurance company limited 2009 17 supreme court of cases 565 ii new india assurance co
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJoga Ravi Vara Prasad Vs. Commissioner, Mandapeta Municipal Council, M ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2001(1)ALD396; 2001(1)ALT456
the commissioner is set aside as it is offending section 17 of the act and the writ petition is accordingly allowed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Geo Industries and Insecticides (i) Pvt ...
Court : Chennai
Reported in : [1998]234ITR541(Mad)
hereinafter to be referred to as the act on september 17 1975 determining the total income after carrying forward the loss
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUniversal Brotherhood Co-op. Group Housing Society Ltd. and Others Vs. ...
Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
6 bangalore development authority v syndicate bank ii 2007 cpj 17 sc i 2008 slt 761 relied para 27 comparative citation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRavji Khimji Chheda and Others Vs. Kesarben Laxmichand Dedhia and Othe ...
Court : Mumbai
attention to recitals 9 and 10 and clauses 9 16 17 20 of the said mou it is submitted that the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhawanidas Binani Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : [1980]124ITR783(Bom)
22 182 9 95 874 8 31 845 1964 65 2019 17 10 1963 17 91 193 16 86 522 15 made a subsequent disclosure on 19th may 1965 though dated 17th may 1965 of a further income of rs 1 75
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNepa Limited Vs. Sardar Santosh Singh Ajmani and ors.
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2004(3)MPHT328; 2004(3)MPLJ371; [2005]59SCL570(MP)
22 that if an enquiry is pending under section 16 17 or any scheme referred to under section 17 is under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChanumolu Nirmala and Others Vs. Ch. Indira Devi and Another
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1994SC662; 1995Supp(4)SCC531
costs haryan urban development authority act 13 of 1977 section 17 s b sinha dr mukundakam sharma jj allotment of plot
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT