2017 12 Scc18 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 2017 12 scc18 Year: 2020 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.109 seconds)M/s Chalet Hotels Limited Vs. M/s Hindustan Aeronautics Limited
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-29-2020
purchasers from these 289 flats 102 flats are on the 12th to 17th floors in the 10 wings out of which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jun-30-2020
..... accepted norm that the 7 2015 6 scc347 8 2018 3 scc18 9 2017 16 scc680 10 2019 5 scc554 16 age of the deceased ..... disablement in magma general insurance co ltd v nanu ram ors 12 this court interpreted consortium to be a compendious term which encompasses ..... trial court the claimants were granted liberty to withdraw the same 12 the appellant insurance company is directed to pay the balance amount of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Bright Vs. The District Collector
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-05-2020
therefore the act in question was enacted this court in 12 mardia chemical transcore and hindon forge private lim ited has reasons makes the pro 6 2009 10 scc5527 2014 6 scc18 2014 3 scc5025 vision mandatory if the district magistrate has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Huligewwa @ Huligemma Vs. Hanumanthappa
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-05-2020
by sri deepak c magnur advocate crl p no 102043 2017 2 this criminal petition is filed under section482cr p c cancel the maintenance granted by exercising the power under section 127 2 cr p c as such the impugned order sustains
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAikyam Holdings Private Limited Vs. Karnataka Electricity Regulatory C ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-28-2020
03 25 and 23 18 28 hours on 28 03 2017 e twice the power purchase agreement was submitted for the expected of the instrumentalities of state as defined under article 12 of the constitution of india are not the punctus punctilio
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr M Babanna Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-27-2020
k k1 k2 k3 and legal notice dated 24 4 2017 by the petitioner s counsel sri l m chidanandayya annexure court in quashing the proceeding in the interest of justice 12 in the instant case the original suit is pending between
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. J R Narayana Swamy Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-01-2020
2017 36771 2017 36772 2017 36773 2017 37098 2017 37099 2017 37100 2017 37439 2017 39103 2017 39104 2017 40493 2017 dated1208 2016 vide annexure a etc in w p no 1272 of2017 between sudarshan stone enterprises pvt ltd represented by its
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri K R Krishnaswamy Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-01-2020
2017 35367 2017 35438 2017 35439 2017 36770 2017 36771 2017 36772 2017 36773 2017 37098 2017 37099 2017 37100 2017 dated1208 2016 vide annexure a etc in w p no 1272 of2017 between sudarshan stone enterprises pvt ltd represented by its
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s H V R Enterprises Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-01-2020
2017 11584 2017 11585 2017 11586 2017 11587 2017 1272 2017 14675 2017 1541 2017 15748 2017 1620 2017 1621 2017 period of eighteen months from the commencement of these rules 12 holders of working permissions granted under these rules shall apply
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRekappa L Rathod Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-01-2020
2017 16492 2017 1948 2017 2213 2017 2236 2017 2237 2017 2262 2017 27080 2017 28335 2017 30357 2017 30358 2017 of siddamallappa aged about40years survey numbr42melur village hasadamahalli chamarajanagar 571 123 chamarajanagar district petitioner by sri d l n rao senior
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT