2010 6 Scc614 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 2010 6 scc614 Year: 2019 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.4 seconds)63 Moons Technologies Ltd (Formerly Known as Financial Technologies In ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-30-2019
..... railway recruitment board and anr v k shyam kumar and ors 2010 6 scc614 which according to them renders the judgment in mohinder singh gill ..... have been granted to ibma on a daily basis since february 2010 corporate governance risk management 1 8 while the bye laws and ..... 1 10 the board meeting minutes of 31 march 2010 and 11 august 2010 stated that the company nsel approached karvy financial services .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVinubhai Haribhai Malaviya Vs. The State of Gujarat
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-16-2019
..... v s papaiah 1997 7 scc614 1997 scc cri 1112 state of orissa v mahima 2007 15 scc580 2010 3 scc cri 611 2003 ..... exhibit31 and for discharge exhibit32 were filed by accused 2 to 6 by an order dated 24 08 2011 the magistrate dismissed the ..... committed then appropriate criminal proceedings can be initiated against such person 6 pursuant to this order the investigation was handed over to investigating .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajat Sud vs.j P Sud & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2019
..... house ii rambhau ramdeo gajre v naryan bapuji dhotra 2004 8 scc614 42 having heard the learned counsel for the parties the only ..... appellant had filed a replication to the written statement in february 2010 wherein it was mentioned that the plaintiff reserved its right to ..... complete legal rights upon the appellant and the respondent no 4 vis vis the respondent nos 1 to 3 with regard to their rights .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBalvir Singh Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-19-2019
..... state of uttar pradesh v ram kumar and others 2017 14 scc614 the supreme court held that the mere fact that on the ..... imposed upon him is affirmed and criminal appeal no 1119 of 2010 is dismissed accused harnam singh shall surrender himself within four weeks ..... been filed against them upon consideration of oral and documentary evidence 6 the trial court convicted the accused and sentenced them to undergo .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGmr Chhattisgarh Energy Ltd. & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
..... 2014 9 scc516 judgment dated 25 08 2014 and in 2014 9 scc614 judgment dated 24 09 2014 the three petitions have therefore been ..... 3 scc214 coal india ltd ors vs alok fuels private limited ors 2010 10 scc157 abl international ltd anr v export credit guarantee corporation ..... of the subsequent decision delivered by this court the same collected 6 the question of delay and laches has been examined by this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEssar Power m.p. Ltd. & Anr vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-2019
..... 2014 9 scc516 judgment dated 25 08 2014 and in 2014 9 scc614 judgment dated 24 09 2014 the three petitions have therefore been ..... 3 scc214 coal india ltd ors vs alok fuels private limited ors 2010 10 scc157 abl international ltd anr v export credit guarantee corporation ..... of the subsequent decision delivered by this court the same collected 6 the question of delay and laches has been examined by this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGovind Raj vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2019
..... corroboration in kartik malhar vs state of bihar reported as 1996 1 scc614 27 the supreme court opined that a close relative who is ..... emphasis added 29 in jayabalan v ut of pondicherry reported as 2010 1 scc199 once again the supreme court highlighted the caution required ..... in delhi and sent to judicial custody constable sajjan singh pw 6 who had accompanied the i o from delhi to tamil nadu .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKamaljeet Singh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
..... cited hem raj ors vs state of haryana reported as 2005 10 scc614 we are afraid the above decision is not applicable to the facts ..... regard is made to ajmer singh vs state of haryana reported as 2010 3 scc746 wherein the supreme court observed as follows 20 we cannot ..... of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 6 months each for the offence punishable u s 3ipc ii undergo rigorous .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManpreet vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
..... cited hem raj ors vs state of haryana reported as 2005 10 scc614 we are afraid the above decision is not applicable to the facts ..... regard is made to ajmer singh vs state of haryana reported as 2010 3 scc746 wherein the supreme court observed as follows 20 we cannot ..... of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 6 months each for the offence punishable u s 3ipc ii undergo rigorous .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamanjeet Singh @ Rummy vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-26-2019
..... cited hem raj ors vs state of haryana reported as 2005 10 scc614 we are afraid the above decision is not applicable to the facts ..... regard is made to ajmer singh vs state of haryana reported as 2010 3 scc746 wherein the supreme court observed as follows 20 we cannot ..... of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 6 months each for the offence punishable u s 3ipc ii undergo rigorous .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT