Skip to content

Did you mean: 2009 5 sick?


2009 5 Scc6416 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: 2009 5 scc6416 Sorted by: recent Court: mumbai goa Page 1 of about 300 results (0.141 seconds)
Nov 21 2016 (HC)

Arvind Sinai Nagarsenkar and Others Vs. Vishram Krishna Kantak (expire ...

Court: Mumbai Goa

that was decided by the municipal council on 13 11 2009 allowing some such persons to erect stalls shacks in the municipal council the said property is enrolled under matriz no 529 which is surveyed under various survey numbers including survey nos

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 18 2016 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sambhajirao Madhavrao Rane and Others

Court: Mumbai Goa

of oriental insurance company limited vs angad kol and others 2009 11 scc 356 in order to submit that two separate counsel for the respondent no 2 owner of the vehicle 5 it is strenuously urged on behalf of the appellant that

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 27 2016 (HC)

Raul Aires Fernandes and Another Vs. State Of Goa, through its Chief S ...

Court: Mumbai Goa

very same building regulation he submitted that the respondent no 5 was entitled to the maximum height of 7 5 mtrs

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 24 2016 (HC)

Sabina Fernandes and Others Vs. The Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Stat ...

Court: Mumbai Goa

that a scam involved funds of magnitude of above rupees 50 crores and they could not register the petitioner no 1

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 21 2016 (HC)

Narcinva Govind Naik and Another Vs. Vikramsingh Routella and Others

Court: Mumbai Goa

tribunal has dismissed the said revision application on 7 7 2009 which is subject matter of challenge in this petition 6 was thus contended that the application is without any merit 5 the learned mamlatdar by order dated 21 8 2002 allowed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 20 2016 (HC)

Caetano R. Silva Vs. Prescribed Authority, Minister of Home Affairs an ...

Court: Mumbai Goa

counsel has referred to rule 40 of the citizenship rules 2009 in order to submit that for the purposes of subsection the said ministry it is significant to note that para 5 of the impugned order sets out that the petitioner was

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 18 2016 (HC)

Fortis Hospitals Limited and Others Vs. Antonieta Ribeiro e Souza and ...

Court: Mumbai Goa

ores pvt ltd vs m s hede and company 2007 5 scc 614 has held that a plaint can be rejected

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 15 2016 (HC)

Lalitprabha Krishnaji Ajgaokar, since deceased through her legal repre ...

Court: Mumbai Goa

6 the learned trial court by the impugned order dated 5 11 2015 has dismissed the application on the ground that

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 15 2016 (HC)

Peter Francis Conceicao and Others Vs. Candolina Conceicao and Another

Court: Mumbai Goa

such point having been raised in the memo of appeal 5 whether the impugned decree is in contravention of section 26

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 14 2016 (HC)

Herbertsons Ltd. Vs. Crag Martin Distillery Private Limited

Court: Mumbai Goa

registration no 183202 the plaintiff also claimed damages of rs 5 crores from the defendant on 28 09 2001 the defendant

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //