2007 2 Scc181 - Judgment Search Results

Darnasi Per Vs. The District Collector (Cs), Prakasam Di

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... india air1981s c 818 and rajesh kumar vs deputy cit 2007 2 scc181 by failing to consider the explanation of the petitioner with ..... judgment hereunder as per the oxford dictionary thesaurus indian edition 2007 meaning of the word enquiry includes probe examine explore delve ..... with the statements she has also submitted that respondent nos 2 and 1 have mechanically confirmed the order of respondent no .....

Vls Finacne Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Commissioner F Income Tax and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... j rohinton fali nariman new delhi april28 2016 1 2007 2 scc181 2 2002 254 itr772 sc 3 1998 229 itr399 4 1996 221 itr24 ..... expired inasmuch as this court has passed an order dated 5th february 2007 that audit may go on but no final assessment order be ..... additional solicitor general refuting the aforesaid contention submitted that as per explanation 2 to section 158be when it is a case of search period .....

Smt. B. Manj Vs. District Collector, Civil Supplies, Kurn

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... india air1981s c 818 and rajesh kumar versus deputy cit 2007 2 scc181 by failing to consider the explanation of the petitioner with reference ..... reasons in writing as per the oxford dictionary thesaurus indian edition 2007 meaning of the word enquiry includes probe examine explore delve ..... order was confirmed in appeal and revision by respondent nos 2 and 1 respectively i have heard sr k rajanna learned .....

Union of India vs.a.c. Mathur

Court : Delhi

..... also see rajesh kumar and others versus deputy cit and others 2007 2 scc181 the expression civil consequences in mohinder singh gill and another ..... services classification control and appeal rules 1965 rules for short 2 in short the tribunal has held that the respondent was ..... of such requirements c shri mathur further contended stated that 2 to 3 days time was sufficient as documents called from .....

Babita Lila and Anr Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... rajesh kumar and others vs deputy c i t and others 2007 2 scc181 y abraham ajith and others vs inspector of police chennai and ..... versus union of india respondent judgment amitava roy j leave granted 2 being aggrieved by the rejection of their challenge to the initiation ..... nand singh and another vs state of bihar and another 1998 2 scc493were recorded with approval 7 section 190 of the code empowers .....

New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Dinesh Chandra Porwal

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

ltd v laxmi narain dhut 2007 3 cpj 13 sc 2007 2 acc 28 sc 2007 4 slt 102 2007 3 in national insurance co ltd v laxmi narain dhut iii 2007 cpj 13 sc ii 2007 acc 28 sc iv 2007

Kedarnath Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(1)MPHT233

2004crilj4623 d shashikant v central bureau of investigation and ors 2007 1 scc 630 e adri dharan das v stale of act on his part he has been charged under section 201 ipc these factors are prima facie established and that is

Madhusudan Vs. Income-tax Officer and Another.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1995)125CTR(MP)48; [1995]213ITR840(MP)

matrix of each case dr jaidev siddha v jaiprakash siddha 2007 2 mpjr fb 361 air 2007 mp 269 fb is jaiprakash siddha 2007 2 mpjr fb 361 air 2007 mp 269 fb is not impliedly overruled in view of dismissal of

Rajmani Sharma Vs. Presiding Officer, Cgit and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2004)IILLJ429MP; 2004(1)MPLJ349

siddha v jaiprakash siddha 2007 2 mpjr fb 361 air 2007 mp 269 fb is not impliedly overruled in view of 2003 filed for review of the order dated january 21 2002 the appellant has filed this letters patent appeal under clause

Alpine Industries Ltd. Vs. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporati ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : III(2005)BC284

158 court clarifies that dr jaidev siddha v jaiprakash siddha 2007 2 mpjr fb 361 air 2007 mp 269 fb is and m w p 469 04 2 on 12 5 2004 this court while deciding the issue of grant of ad