2006 4 Scc68327 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 2006 4 scc68327 Court: mumbai goa Page 1 of about 300 results (0.21 seconds)Maria Benvinda Severina Dias Costa Vs. Lilia Kher and Others
Court : Mumbai Goa
anandi bhicaro veluskar v s kustanand vithu veluskar and another 2006 4 air bom r 88 4 maria margarida sequeria fernandes burden of proving the claim of continuous possession of over 40 years in respect of the suit property in the facts
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUpasana Majgaonkar and Others Vs. State of Goa, through its Chief Secr ...
Court : Mumbai Goa
given pay protection he further submits that after 01 01 2006 the entire cadre as such has been getting same pay the hon ble apex court reported in 2006 9 scc 406 in the case of k t veerappa and ors vs
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChater S. JaIn Vs. B. Abdul Kadar and Another
Court : Mumbai Goa
pertaining to the cheque bearing no 6126988 dated 30 05 2006 for rs 50 000 by hearing the parties afresh if complaint was registered as case no oa 87 2007 d 4 substance of accusation was explained to the accused and he
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVishnu Mahadev Prabhu, (Since deceased-represented by his Legal Repres ...
Court : Mumbai Goa
the petitioner and two others filed writ petition no 572 2006 before this court which came to be disposed of vide no action was taken the petitioner filed the above petition 4 shri ryan menezes learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajendra D. Harmalkar Vs. M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited Through ...
Court : Mumbai Goa
the order of dismissal from the services dated 10 03 2006 passed by the disciplinary authority and subsequently confirmed by the state of karnataka and others reported in 2006 1 scc 430 at para 30 thus 30 this court has come a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndu G.N. Rane, Principal, People's Higher Secondary School (Governmen ...
Court : Mumbai Goa
students as set out in the representation dated 08 08 2006 this aspect was not disputed during the course of the the higher pay scale of rs 10 000 15 200 4 the petitioner sent two representations one in the year 2006
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhukar B. Kunkalienkar, Accountant and Others Vs. State of Goa, thro ...
Court : Mumbai Goa
today decided writ petitions no 243 of 2006 326 of 2006 and 336 of 2006 there the question was whether wage this court in it it is stated that recommendation of 4th pay commission were accepted by the government of goa w
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRobinson D'Costa Vs. Nesbit D'Costa and Another
Court : Mumbai Goa
other liability 7 another authority cited before the court is 2006 6 bom c r 874 in the case of narendra and one branch manger pw2 and also produced relevant documents 4 as mentioned earlier the trial court continued on the basis
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. M/s. Seagull Threads (India) Ltd.
Court : Mumbai Goa
was justified in setting aside the order dated 24 3 2006 passed by the commissioner in view of the facts and the said order the appellant has preferred the present appeal 4 the learned central government standing counsel appearing for the appellant
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVinanti Ratnakar Gaonkar Vs. Sahajanand Investments Private Limited an ...
Court : Mumbai Goa
no 1 has already cancelled the agreement on 07 10 2006 in any event the petitioner having failed to deposit the the one filed by the respondent no 1 was allowed 4 i have heard mr lotlikar the learned senior counsel for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT