2004 11 Scc 360 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 2004 11 scc 360 Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.273 seconds)Rajendra S/O Ramaji Mahisbadwe Vs. the Joint Commissioner and Vice Cha ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
central warehouse corporation vs jagdish kumar slp civil 25644 of 2004 and as facts there warranted grant of protection the hon undergone any change because of these judgments 19 in 2012 11 ljsoft 10 2013 1 mah l j 139 apurva ashok of zillaparishad vs state of maharashtra reported at 2010 6 scc 592 para 17 the hon ble apex court directs creation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSara Harry D'Mello and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-10-2013
the land 24 in balrajtulsidas pillai vs state of maharashtra 2004 3 bom c r 466 a learned single judge of slum is situate really comes within the scope of section 11 1 and consequently under section 14 1 section 12 provides court in a p v s n ramanaiah 2009 7 scc 165 para 33 has restated the well settled legal proposition
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJeevan Bima Nagar Flat Owners Welfare Association Vs. Life Insurance C ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
cases referred 1 savita garg v national heart institute iv 2004 cpj 40 sc vi 2004 slt 385 referred para 43 inside the complex representations and writ petitions 20 on 19 11 1994 a number of flat owners gave a representation thereafter 2004 cpj 40 sc vi 2004 slt 385 2004 8 scc 56 69 oelig therefore as a result of our above
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatpal P. Malhotra and Others Vs. Puneet Malhotra and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-14-2013
cementation india limited vs bajranglal agarwal and others reported in 2004 2 arb lr 67 and in particular paragraphs 2 and general fibre dealers ltd reported in air 1962 s c 1123 relied upon by mr kamdar mr dvitre also placed reliance vs siemens public communications network ltd reported in 2002 5 scc 510 in support of his plea that the provisions of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPatel Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. B.T. Patil and Sons Belgaum (Constructi ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
in the case reported in reshmi construction and builders case 2004 2 scc 667 has taken notice of the fact that 5 doctrine of adverse inference read with sections 101 to 110 question as to burden of proof the three judge bench kumar gupta and co vs union of india 2010 1 scc 409 para 8 to 10 12 to 15 15 to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLufeng Shipping Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. M.V. Rainbow Ace and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-06-2013
act 1958 and the decision in m v sea success 2004 9 scc 512 it is submitted that the honble supreme or defendant no 2 or zjhx shipping co ltd 17 11 rainbow ace shipping s a panama rainbow navigation investment co the apex court in m v elizabeth 1993 2 supp scc 433 the decision of the division bench of this court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of U.P. Vs. Hari Ram.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
urban ceiling and regulation act 1976 u p and another 2004 13 scc 452 mukarram ali khan v state of uttar baker and partners 2004 2 all e r 141 at 11 described as ldquo heroic piece of deeming rdquo 24 the s gopal reddy v state of u p 1996 4 scc 596 held ldquo it is well known rule of interpretation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMoti Lal Songara Vs. Prem Prakash @ Pappu and Another
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-16-2013
dharam pal and others v state of haryana and another 2004 13 scc 9 a three judge bench was dealing with merits but on the foundation that the order dated 19 11 2008 passed by the learned additional chief judicial magistrate taking in raj kishore prasad v state of bihar 1996 4 scc 495 with regard to the ratio laid down in kishun
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNagpur Distillers Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Kopargaon Sahakari Sakhar ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: May-07-2013
v l r and co seven star distilleries 4 3 2004 seven star distilleries v l r and co 5 1 no 2 herein filed an application under order vii rule 11 for rejection of plaint dismissal of suit on the ground chitivalasajute mills vs jaypee rewa cement reported in 2004 3 scc 85 and submitted that if two suits in two courts
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNiranjan Hemchandra Sashittal and anr. Vs. State of MaharashtrA.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
h shekh and another v state of gujarat and others 2004 4 scc 158 satyajit banerjee and others v state of mr sanjay v kharde learned counsel for the respondent state 11 to appreciate the centripodal issue whether in such a case raj deo sharma ii v state of bihar 1999 7 scc 604 came to the field relating to prescription of outer
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT