1995 2 Scc 648 - Judgment Search Results

indira Sawhney Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC498; 2000(1)ALLMR(SC)99; JT1999(9)SC557; 1999(7)SCALE411; (2000)1SCC168; [1999]Supp5SCR229; 2000(3)SLJ101(SC); 2000(1)LC367(SC); (2000)1UPLBEC455

..... reservation of appointments or posts in the service under the state act 1995 ii it extends to the whole of the state of kerala iii ..... of himself and three others jeevan reddy j pointed out para 798 scc that opinion in regard to backwardness and inadequate representation must be ..... to equality paras 520 and 535a of scc hegde shelat jj also referred to the preamble paras 648 652 ray j as he then was .....

Y.M. Sehgal Vs. K.V. Sachdeva

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 79(1999)DLT101; 1999(49)DRJ692

central pension accounting office ministry of finance dated 3 7 1995 wherein the name of the bank where the pension was assailed the finding of the rent controller regarding property no 23 a kamla nagar delhi which was sold by the petitioner cited rakesh kumar sehgal v nem chand 1987 2 rcr 648 and decision of punjab and haryana high court in kasturi

Paper Clipping Clipping Containing an Article Under the Caption Karimn ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD14; 1999(5)ALT654

150 awarded by the tribunal was enhanced to rs 8 20 000 mehla and others v union of india and other 1998 scc 648 as also the order passed by a learned single and others v union of india and other 1998 scc 648 as also the order passed by a learned single judge

Monga Metals (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2000)67TTJ(All)247

565 as per order under section 154 for assessment years 1995 96 and 1996 97 respectively on account of alleged introduction itr 151 sc dhakeshwari cotton mills ltd v cit 1954 26 itr 775 sc and umacharan shaw brothers v cit 1959 collection a c000000050frontiex alloy7 22001b r residence19 29 44008bank25 92 64830b r residence sus 25 00054g e c 20 53030bank of

Maharaja Fatehsinhrao Zoo Trust Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1999Guj346; (1999)3GLR2361

as to whether such land will be allotted under section 29 after it vests in the state government the acquisition of samatha v state of a p reported in 1997 8 scc 191 air 1997 sc 3297 it was contended that the gujarat revenue tribunal in revision application no ten b a 648 84 confirming the order dated 25 4 1984 in ceiling

Murlidhar Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2000Raj170

distillery ltd v state of karnataka 1995 1 scc 574 1995 air scw 313 the only right of the licensee is the exclusive privilege for the years 1999 2000 and 2000 2001 for retail and wholesale sate of country liquor indian made board of trustees of the port of bombay 1989 3 scc 293 air 1989 sc 1642 and observed that even in

Pramod Jha and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

of status quo was continued by order dated september 12 1995 since the engagement of the petitioners continued in obedience to there can be no regularisation see air 1992 sc 2130 21 the claim for regularisation has invariably been made by persons m p v bal kishan soni and ors 1997 5 scc 86 the petitioners who were class iv employees employed in

Sharanjit Singh Vs. Satwant Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : I(2001)DMC139

india hindu law reporter 417 naveen bansal v seetna bansal 1995 all india hindu law reporter529 jai bhagwan v sushila chanda dmc 274 hemant kumar vinod chandra sukhadia v paruben 1992 2 all india hindu law reporter 382 and dhankit vadra v sc gurdhiana singh v gurmeet kaur 1996 3 114 plr 648 krishna kumari v ashwani kumar 1996 3 114 plr 414

State of Rajasthan Vs. Nav Bharat Construction Co.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2000Raj180

of rs 20 000 in the application dt 30 5 1995 the respondent company claimed compound interest 18 p a instead 5 dodsai pvt ltd v d e s u 1996 2 scc 576 air 1996 sc 3229 6 m m t ltd 1994 a t l r p 481 1994 6 scc 485 1995 1 arb l r p 1 1994 air

Pukh Raj and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2000Raj89

karim air 1992 sc 2166 rajeshwari amma v joseph air 1995 sc 719 commr of income tax v u p forest law 6 the provisions of sub rule 2 of rule 265 of the rajasthan panchayat general rules 1961 for short the sangh bombay v indian hume pipe co ltd 1993 2 scc 386 and cit v sun engineering works p ltd 1992