1987 3 Scc27915 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1987 3 scc27915 Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.125 seconds)M/S. Paparam Bricks and Tiles, Hinkal, Mysore Vs. Hinkal Village Panch ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-08-1997
Reported in : ILR1997KAR2878
the petitioner to pay property tax for the years 1986 1987 and 1987 1988 and also the subsequent demand notice dated tax at the rate of rs 640 till 1986 1987 3 for the years 1987 1988 and 1988 1989 petitioner was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Chandrakant Navaratan Vs. Sharada Bai
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Nov-13-1997
Reported in : 1997(6)ALT367
the parties agreed to enhance the rent from 1 9 1987 of course this is not accepted by the tenant it case no doubt the rent was rs 250 and rs 300 per month initially but by virtue of ex r 5
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.A. Engineer Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Dec-18-1997
Reported in : (1999)1SCC304; 1998(1)LC214(SC); (1998)1UPLBEC268
administrative service in 1986 he was so promoted in the 1987 and that too on the direction of the tribunal the however be no order as to costs service appointment regulations 3 5 and 9 of i a s appointment by promotion
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDaya Shankar Tiwari Vs. Principal, Smt. Ramwanti Devi, Beni Madho Uchc ...
Court : Allahabad
Decided on : Nov-06-1997
Reported in : 1998(1)AWC381; (1998)2UPLBEC1101
the petitioner was granted opportunity to defend on 15 11 1987 which is impossible and this shows that the petitioner was hereby quashed service termination section 16g 3 and regulations 31 36 37 and 100 of chapter iii of u p intermediate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.K. Dalip Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-01-1997
Reported in : 1998IIAD(Delhi)474; 71(1998)DLT40
order in its order annexure p 2 dated 18 5 1987 though held that the fourth charge as worded was not 4 still feeling aggrieved the petitioner preferred appeal annexure p 3 which was dismissed on 13 5 1987 by the deputy
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirm Murlidhar Ishwardas Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Feb-25-1997
Reported in : 1997(2)WLC437; 1997(1)WLN218
aside the impugned order at ex 3 dated 13 5 1987 writ allowed the revenue board shall decide the revision petition accordingly this petition is allowed the impugned order at ex 3 dated 13 5 1987 passed by the revenue board is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rampur Distillery and Chemical C ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-01-1997
Reported in : (1998)60TTJ(Del)630
following its previous year ending on 31st day of december 1987 an application dt 12th november 1987 was filed before the the net result of the said order under s 154 3 4 will be that assessee company will be assessed to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmbika Silk Mills Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Maharashtra General Kamgar ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Oct-21-1997
Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR609; 1998(2)BomCR148; [1998(79)FLR1]; (1999)IIILLJ1095Bom; 1998(1)MhLj568
the employer company in issuing the notice dated 6 1 1987 was in accord and conformity with the permission granted by for one exception and that is as provided in section 33 a it deals with the appearance of person in proceedings
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.B. Education Society, Banjara Hills, Hyd. Vs. Govt. of A.P. and anr.
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-04-1997
Reported in : 1998(1)ALD639
college pharmacy college etc under tamil nadu medical university act 1987 the application was made and it was rejected thereupon the the scheme and the recommendations of the council under subsection 3 and after obtaining where necessary such other particulars as may
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Sudarshan Plywood Industries Ltd. an ...
Court : Guwahati
Decided on : Apr-09-1997
dated 9 4 1985 in civil rule no 650 of 1987 3 since the facts are alike for the sake of february 1984 d central excise duty amounting to rs 42 32 224 00 rupees forty two lakhs thirty two thousand two
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT