1987 3 Scc27915 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1987 3 scc27915 Court: mumbai Page 1 of about 300 results (0.225 seconds)Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and anr. Vs. Noshir Shapurji D ...
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1991(1)BomCR53; (1990)92BOMLR462
levy the impugned fees state of west bengal and others 1987 2scr1207 is clearly inapplicable to the present case 313 1 of the bombay municipal corporation act the object of section 313 is to prohibit encroachment or obstruction by placing or depositing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVijay Ramchandra Thopate, and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...
Court : Mumbai
tailoring business and on 16th january 1997 at about 2 30 p m he was passing through padmavati road powai he
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGajanan Gangaram Patil and Others Vs. M/S. Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. ...
Court : Mumbai
has agreed for following compensation 2 compensation already paid the 34 medically unfit ex nocil employees appearing in annexure c are
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBharat Biotech International Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Gr.Mumb ...
Court : Mumbai
of poddarsteel corporation vs ganesh engineering works and ors 1991 3 supreme court cases 273 relied on by mr vashi has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Suhas Naik Vs. Planning and Development Authority
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1988)90BOMLR506; 1989MhLJ245
referred to meghana a p desai v union of india 1987 mah l j 93 followed land acquisition act 1894 c a qualified engineer this registration was renewed upto december 1987 3 one andrew francisce de sousa submitted to the respondent an
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTComunidade of Chicalim, by Its Attorney (Procurador), Shri J.J.S. Rodr ...
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (2003)180CTR(Bom)76; [2002]258ITR183(Bom)
fully andtruly all material facts necessary for relevantassessment year 1986 1987 no indication in this behalfis to be found in the of the petitioners income for the saidassessment year 1986 1987 3 the petitioner after receipt of theaforesaid notice under section 148
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDina Naik and anr. Vs. Kadamba Transport Corpn. Ltd. and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : [1989(58)FLR807]; (1995)IIILLJ13Bom
the first petitioner by the impugned letter dated 11th august 1987 3 mr m s sonak learned counsel appearing for the first petitioner by the impugned letter dated 11th august 1987 3 mr m s sonak learned counsel appearing for the petitioners
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAuro Engg. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. R.A. Gadekar and Others
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1991)93BOMLR595; (1992)IILLJ693Bom; 1992(1)MhLj131
attempted to serve the orders of retrenchment on september 8 1987 each of the four concerned workmen had refused to accept became due and payable to workmen from august 1 1987 3 the industrial court held the retrenchment to be illegal on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAfsar Shaikh Vs. P.N. Kaul and anr.
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : (1997)99BOMLR549; 1997(1)Mh.LJ596
bombay rent control act by maharashtra act no xviii of 1987 introduced on 1 10 1987 is applicable to the licences issue no 4 that the agreement provided the period of 33 months w e f 1 10 1983 and that period
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHanumansingh S/O Laxmansingh Thakur Vs. Municipal Council and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 1989(2)BomCR129
or the object of the maharashtra act no xxx of 1987 was to remove the injustice caused by not applying the in the vidarbha region who was permanent in service on 31 12 66 he is entitled to continue upto 60 years
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT