1986 1 Scc26444 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: 1986 1 scc26444 Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1993 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.057 seconds)Piara Singh and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Sep-14-1993
Reported in : (1994)108PLR668
award he stated that the award was made 12 9 1986 within the prescribed period of limitation and in accordance with writ petition no 2992 of 1988 decided on 14 10 1988 as reported in om parkash v state of haryana 1984
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLachhman Singh and anr. Vs. Smt. Bohli and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-27-1993
Reported in : (1994)106PLR114
which they could not return to kurukshetra till june 6 1986 the trial court did not however accept this explanation on cause was the court competent to extend time under section 148 of the code of civil procedure relying upon the judgment
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAvtar Singh Vs. Balwant Singh
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Oct-18-1993
Reported in : (1993)105PLR56
as the matter in issue in rsa no 124 of 1986 and the present proceedings was substantially similar proceedings in the the defendants have filed r s a no 124 of 1986 which is yet pending in this court the findings recorded
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Garja Singh and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-21-1993
Reported in : (1993)104PLR40
by giving erratic irrational or irrelevant reasons consumer protection act 1986 c a no 68 1986 articles 14 300a government contract 17th december 1991 whereby the application for reference under section 18 of the land acquisition act hereinafter referred to as the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrema Vs. Surat Singh and anr.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-18-1993
Reported in : (1993)104PLR738
subordinate judge in civil suit no 129 of 25 9 1986 was challenged by the pre emptor in civil appeal no narain etc vide sale deed dated 15 10 1984 and 1 4 share of the land from another cosharer namely jangli
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRonak Vs. the State of Haryana Through Commissioner, Excise and Taxati ...
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-05-1993
Reported in : (1994)106PLR288
1985 10 453 1981 82 29 1 1986 25 4 1986 2 15 153 1982 83 30 3 1987 27 4 1974 75 1975 76 1976 77 1978 79 1980 81 1981 82 and 1982 83 were made it is admitted that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHaryana Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. Vs. Chandigarh Administration ...
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-11-1993
Reported in : (1994)106PLR56
singhs case 78 423 relating to the period 1977 to 1986 the workman is clearly not entitled to any amount prior 8 for the foregoing observations writ petition no 6051 of 1985 is allowed and the award of the labour court dated
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmar Singh and ors. Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh and anr.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-07-1993
Reported in : (1994)108PLR425
by giving erratic irrational or irrelevant reasons consumer protection act 1986 c a no 68 1986 articles 14 300a government contract sodhi j 1 by a preliminary notification dated october 11 1991 issued under section 4 of the land acquisition act 1894
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagdish Puri Vs. Kundan Lal Thaper
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Nov-30-1993
Reported in : (1993)105PLR306
this court in hari mittal v b m sikka 1 1986 1 89 p l r 1 f b it has defend granted by this court vide order dated april 5 1990 passed in civil revision no 3714 of 1989 the parties
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArchna Sharma Vs. Suresh Kumar Sharma
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Dec-20-1993
Reported in : I(1995)DMC133; (1994)108PLR702
in yet another case vinod kumar sharma v nutan sharma 1986 1 all india hindu law reporter 625 the complaints made letter exhibit px in narain datt sharma v santosh sharma 1986 1 all india hindu law reporter 573 the complaints made
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT